Transformational Leadership and Employee Green Behavior in SMEs: The Mediating Roles of Green Business Strategy and Organizational Support and the Moderating Effect of Implementation Barriers

Authors

Nguyen Duy Chuc

School of Economic – Hanoi University of Industry (Vietnam)

Kieu Van Tien

School of Economic – Hanoi University of Industry (Vietnam)

Nguyen Hoang Yen Nhi

School of Economic – Hanoi University of Industry (Vietnam)

Nguyen Ngoc Anh

School of Economic – Hanoi University of Industry (Vietnam)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0219

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 2669-2688

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-14

Accepted: 2026-04-20

Published: 2026-05-08

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the role of transformational leadership in promoting employee green behavior (EGB) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), with particular emphasis on the underlying organizational mechanisms and contextual conditions. Specifically, it investigates the mediating roles of green business strategy (GBS) and organizational support (OS), as well as the moderating effect of barriers to green implementation (BF).
Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative research design was employed using survey data collected from 280 employees working in manufacturing SMEs in Hanoi and surrounding provinces in Vietnam. The proposed research model was tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4, following a two-stage approach involving measurement and structural model assessment. Bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples was used to evaluate the significance of the hypothesized relationships.
Findings: The results reveal that transformational leadership influences EGB primarily through indirect mechanisms. Among its dimensions, idealized influence and inspirational motivation significantly enhance GBS, whereas intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration do not show significant effects. GBS and OS both exert positive and significant effects on EGB, with GBS emerging as the strongest predictor. Mediation analysis confirms that GBS and OS serve as complementary pathways linking leadership to behavior. However, the moderating effect of BF is not supported, suggesting that perceived barriers do not significantly weaken the impact of GBS on EGB.
Practical implications: The findings highlight the importance of visionary leadership, strategic alignment, and organizational support systems in driving green transformation in SMEs. Managers are encouraged to develop clear sustainability strategies and invest in supportive infrastructures to translate leadership intent into employee action.
Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by providing a multi-level and mechanism-based perspective on green transformation. It extends transformational leadership theory by identifying dimension-specific effects, introduces a dual mediation framework, and challenges the assumed role of barriers in shaping sustainability outcomes, particularly in emerging economy contexts.

Keywords

Transformational leadership; Green business strategy

Downloads

References

1. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte Insights. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2015100101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. OECD. (2021). OECD SME and entrepreneurship outlook 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/97a5bbfe-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 444-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01478.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems: A conceptual framework and an action research program. Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wu, C., Loong, A. H., Sung, T. P., & Jiling, C. (2026). Leadership and digital transformation in SMEs: Evidence from a PRISMA systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v16-i1/27452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles