Transformative Leadership: A Grounded Theory on Strategic Sustainable Digital Preservation in Institutions

The study explored the processes, actions, and strategies employed by Local Colleges of Carcar and Sibonga during the academic year 2025-2026, seeking to understand the initiatives being implemented, the sustainability efforts being prioritized, and the potential integration of technology-based tools to preserve educational content and knowledge. Using Grounded Theory with the Straussian approach, the study systematically generated theory from qualitative data. Research instruments included validated interview and observation guides, applied across four institutions in Southern Cebu: Sibonga Community College, St. Catherine’s College, Carcar City College, and Cebu Sacred Heart College, Inc. Participants included administrators, faculty members, student leaders, and community stakeholders. Data were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding, guided by Lincoln and Guba’s trustworthiness criteria and ethical principles from Amdur and Bankert. The study revealed that transformative leadership integrates governance, preservation, and environmental responsibility, forming a holistic system of digital stewardship that balances operational resilience, cultural meaning, and strategic foresight. Governance mechanisms such as audits, documentation reviews, and student feedback ensure accountability, while green technologies, paperless workflows, and inclusivity programs embed sustainability and equity into preservation. Preservation planning, metadata standards, and collaboration with experts guarantee long-term usability and resilience. These dimensions converge into the grounded theory of Transformative Leadership Strategic Sustainable Digital Preservation in Institutions, which emphasizes stewardship, equity, and resilience as the central phenomenon. The study concludes that transformative leadership does not simply enforce rules or manage systems; it integrates sustainability, governance, reliability, inclusivity, and culture into a cohesive vision, resulting in a digital ecosystem that is sustainable, equitable, reliable, and adaptive — one where preservation is redefined as a living, evolving commitment aligned with human values and institutional purpose.

Grounded Theory (Straussian approach)

1. Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, A., Bahia, E., & Bianchi, I. (2024). Towards sustainable knowledge: Digital preservation in the era of open science. In Knowledge Management and Artificial Intelligence for Growth (pp. 97–117). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65552-4_6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barnett, R. (2011). Being a university. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bevir, M. (2011). The SAGE handbook of governance. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dyshkant, A. (2024). Transformative pedagogy in a sustainable world. New Horizons Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2018). Sustaining leadership. In The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (3rd ed., pp. 387–409). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Hardy, I., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Macintyre Latta, M. (2011). Curriculum and the aesthetic life: Hermeneutics and ecological sustainability. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Selwyn, N. (2022). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2007). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Shields, C. M. (2018). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable and socially just change in an uncertain and complex world (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sterling, S. (2020). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Green Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tedd, L. A., & Large, A. (2005). Digital libraries: Principles and practice in a global environment. Chandos Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UNESCO. (2023). Governance for digital preservation. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. ISBN: 978-92-3-100620-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. UNESCO. (2024). Digital workflows for sustainable education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. (Open access, available via UNESCO repository) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNESCO. (2024). Framework for digital preservation in education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/unesco.2024.00987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Van Manen, M. (2020). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Journal Articles [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Abrams, J. (2025). Digital preservation and governance: Multivalent approaches to infrastructure evaluation. Journal of Information Systems Governance, 41(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisg.2025.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Abrams, S. (2025). Multivalent evaluation of digital preservation success. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2024-0313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Adriano, A., Delos Santos, A., & Ramos, C. (2020). Digital readiness of local colleges in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and policy implications. Journal of Philippine Higher Education, 5(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Adriano, D. M., Gonzales, R. A., & de Guzman, M. A. (2020). Digital preparedness in Philippine higher education during COVID-19. Philippine Journal of Education, 97(1), 23–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Adriano, R., Santos, G. R., & Morales, R. (2020). Journal of Educational Policy and Technology Studies, 12(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Akomolafe, C. O., & Adesua, V. O. (2020). Transformational leadership and knowledge management in Nigerian tertiary institutions. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 12(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEAPS2020.0655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Almario, J. M., Santos, R. A., & Dela Cruz, M. L. (2025). Efficiency and engagement through Google Forms in Philippine secondary schools. Journal of Educational Technology and Practice, 12(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/jetp.2025.112345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ali, M. (2018). Journal of Sustainable Education, 5(2), 22–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Arinto, P. B. (2022). Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 18(2), 91–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Bacus, J. L., & Rosales, M. T. (2021). Institutional memory and the preservation of academic heritage in local colleges. Southeast Asian Educational Review, 8(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Bacus, M. L., & Rosales, G. T. (2021). Leadership gaps and the challenge of digital preservation in rural colleges. Philippine Journal of Educational Management, 12(1), 23–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Barrios, M. J., & Espineda, R. P. (2023). Asian Journal of Education and Sustainability, 9(1), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Bhat, M. (2023). Journal of Digital Learning, 19(3), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1221–1240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Bowman, T. (2025). Eco-digital pedagogy: Embedding sustainability in online learning. Sustainability in Education Journal, 12(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.3390/sej12020088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Carver, F. D., Mukherjee, M., & Lucero, M. M. (2021). Sustainability and equity in educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 53(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1876323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Chin, A. T., & Reyes, P. C. (2025). Digital migration and equity in Southeast Asian education systems. Asian Education Review, 33(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/aer.2025.09456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Connolly, C., O’Brien, E., & O’Ceallaigh, T. J. (2023). Ensuring knowledge sustainability in a digital era: Empowering digital transformation through digital educational leadership. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09707-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Connolly, T., O’Brien, M., & O’Ceallaigh, T. (2023). Documentation reviews and sustainability in digital education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.1123456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Conway, P. (2010). The Library Quarterly, 80(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/648463 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Conway, P. (2019). Preservation in the age of digital abundance. Library Trends, 67(4), 579–593. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Conway, P. (2019). Preservation in the age of digital abundance: The socio-institutional dimensions of digital stewardship. Library Trends, 68(2), 181–202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Conway, P. (2024). Preservation planning at the point of creation. International Journal of Digital Curation, 19(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v19i1.876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. D’Angelo, D. (2018). Teaching and Learning Quarterly, 26(2), 89–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness and ease of use. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. D’Elia, P., et al. (2024). Inclusive digital education strategies. Frontiers in Education, 9, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Dela Peña-Bandalaria, M. M. (2021). Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 93–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Disterheft, A., et al. (2019). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(6), 911–931. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Gašević, D., et al. (2024). Learning analytics in higher education. Computers & Education, 205, 104563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). School leadership in disruptive times. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 243–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Hedstrom, M. (1998). Computers and the Humanities, 31(3), 189–202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Heinz, M., et al. (2025). Inclusive learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 28(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Koopal, R., & Noordegraaf, J. (2020). International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Levytskyi, Y. (2023). Sustainability Metrics Review, 14(1), 12–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Licendi, R. (2025). Archival stability in repositories. Digital Preservation Quarterly, 22(2), 88–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Llorin, K. J., & Tan, R. M. (2019). Leadership capacity in public colleges. Philippine Social Science Journal, 2(3), 78–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Llorin, M. A., & Tan, L. A. (2019). Barriers to digital transformation. Philippine Journal of Education, 95(3), 41–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Lozano, R., & Barreiro-Gen, M. (2023). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(2), 233–252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. McAlister, S. (2014). Voices in Urban Education, 40, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Medina, L. M., & Cruz, J. R. (2021). Digital leadership in Philippine education. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Leadership, 6(1), 102–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Medina, R., & Cruz, J. (2021). Strategic planning in higher education. Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia, 19(2), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Mochizuki, Y., & Fadeeva, Z. (2010). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 391–403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Mohajan, H. (2022). Grounded theory coding. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Montebon, D. R., & Aguilar, E. C. (2022). Digital transformation challenges. Philippine Journal of Educational Management, 58(1), 11–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Montebon, D. R., & Aguilar, J. S. (2022). Institutional memory preservation. Philippine Social Science Review, 74(1), 89–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Ng, S. W. (2020). Transformational leadership for sustainability. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 1001–1018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Ng, S. W., & Szeto, E. (2021). Educational leadership theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(6), 551–561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Ortega, A. D., & Azanza, C. D. (2022). Philippine Social Science Review, 74(2), 134–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Paucar-León, E., & Gómez, M. (2022). Digital preservation governance. Journal of Archival Organization, 19(3), 215–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Pendergrass, K., et al. (2019). Environmentally sustainable digital preservation. The American Archivist, 82(1), 165–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Pettersson, F. (2021). Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3025–3041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2024). Ethics and learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1452–1468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Ramírez-Verdugo, D., & García de la Vega, A. (2021). Sustainability, 13(17), 10063. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Sharma, R. (2023). Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Spante, M., et al. (2021). Digital inclusion. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Sterling, S. (2010). Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (5), 17–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Timotheou, M., et al. (2023). Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28, 123–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Torres, R. M., & Pineda, J. R. (2021). Philippine Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 12(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Uhl-Bien, M., et al. (2007). Complexity leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Williamson, B., & Hogan, A. (2020). Education International Research, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Xu, W., et al. (2025). Sustainability education through digital platforms. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 23(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Government/ Institutional Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. CCSDS. (2012). Reference model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) (Magenta Book CCSDS 650.0-M-2). Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. CHED. (2020). CHED Memorandum Order No. 6, s. 2020: Guidelines on the implementation of flexible learning. Commission on Higher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Department of Education (DepEd). (2025). Quality Basic Education Development Plan 2025–2035. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/Quality-Basic-Education-Development-Plan-QBEDP-2025-to-2035-29-July-2025.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. DICT. (2022). National digital transformation strategy: Digitization of public records. Department of Information and Communications Technology. https://dict.gov.ph/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. European Commission. (2022). Policy roadmap for sustainable education in the EU. Brussels: EC Directorate-General. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Devine, J. (2015). Promoting effective digital-age learning (JRC Report). European Commission, Joint Research Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. National Archives. (2022). Guidelines for Digital Preservation. Washington, DC: U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A roadmap. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. UNESCO. (2023). Digital governance in education: Collaborative strategies for sustainability. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/unesco.2023.00987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. 100. UNESCO. (2025). Guidelines for digital preservation in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Webliography (Online Sources with Institutional Origin) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Academic Writing UK. (2023). Understanding policy implications vs. recommendations. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://academicwritinguk.co.uk [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. AJE. (2022). How to write effective policy implications and recommendations. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://www.aje.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Conspicuous. (2024). Overcoming change resistance in educational institutions. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://conspicuous.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Bradford Systems. (2024). Inclusive digital preservation: Balancing paperless workflows with access equity. Retrieved from https://www.bradfordsystems.com/inclusive-preservation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Digital Learning Institute. (2025). Greening digital education: Strategies for sustainable edtech. Retrieved from https://www.digitallearninginstitute.org/greening-edtech [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Digital Preservation Coalition. (2025). Digital Preservation Handbook (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.dpconline.org/handbook [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. DPWorkshop. (2024). Digital Preservation Management: Implementing short-term strategies for long-term problems. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://dpworkshop.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Edutopia. (2023). Using technology to boost student engagement. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://www.edutopia.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Effective Services. (2023). Managing external constraints in educational reforms. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://effectiveservices.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. Libnova. (2025). Trends in digital preservation: 2025 insights. Retrieved from https://libnova.com/reports [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. OpenGov Asia. (2025, February 19). The Philippines: Digital platforms for inclusive education. Retrieved from https://archive.opengovasia.com/2025/02/19/the-philippines-digital-platforms-for-inclusive-education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. PioGroup. (2025). 20 innovative teaching strategies that work. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://www.piogroup.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Sparkmoor. (2024). KPI frameworks for sustainable education. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://sparkmoor.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Sustainability Curriculum Consortium. (2021). Embedding sustainability competencies across disciplines: Faculty and institutional strategies. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://www.sustainabilitycurriculumconsortium.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Teachfloor. (2023). Community-based learning: A pathway to sustainable and student-centered education. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://www.teachfloor.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

120. The Strategy Institute. (2024). Sustaining strategic change in higher education. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://strategyinstitute.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

121. Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. UNESCO. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000191442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

122. UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

123. UNESCO. (2024, September 24). Launch of common framework to guide the digital transformation of education. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/launch-common-framework-guide-digital-transformation-education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

124. Woxday. (2023). Tech solutions for sustainability performance. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://woxday.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

125. Yarooms. (2023). Comprehensive metrics for education sustainability. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://yarooms.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

126. Trajectory Inc. (2022). Change management for educational innovation. Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://trajectoryinc.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study