Transforming Accreditation into Educational Innovation: An Action Research Framework for Enhancing Student Achievement, Faculty Development, and Institutional Excellence Through Collaborative Quality Assurance

Authors

Erlito M. Albina

College of Technology, Lyceum of the Philippines University, Manila City (Philippines)

Maria Corazon D. Adriano

College of Technology, Lyceum of the Philippines University, Manila City (Philippines)

Josefina A. Lazaro

College of Technology, Lyceum of the Philippines University, Manila City (Philippines)

Mary Jane F. Somao-i

College of Technology, Lyceum of the Philippines University, Manila City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU043

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 5900-5907

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-28

Accepted: 2026-07-04

Published: 2026-07-15

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of accreditation from a compliance-driven mechanism into a dynamic, innovation-oriented process within the BS Information Technology (BSIT) program of Lyceum of the Philippines University–Manila. Guided by Collaborative Governance Theory and Action Research Theory, the study evaluates the effects of accreditation across four dimensions: student achievement, faculty development, institutional excellence, and collaborative quality assurance.
A qualitative action research design was employed, utilizing focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, document analysis, reflective journals, and participant observation. Data were analyzed using a structured thematic analysis with triangulation to ensure credibility and validity. Thematic analysis is widely recognized for systematically identifying patterns in qualitative data [7], while triangulation strengthens reliability through the integration of multiple data sources.
Results indicate positive effects of accreditation on faculty development, institutional excellence, and collaborative quality assurance. However, student achievement yielded the lowest mean score (2.45), suggesting limited awareness of accreditation benefits among students. Prior studies confirm that student awareness significantly influences perceptions of accreditation and academic motivation [10].
The study proposes a participatory, stakeholder-driven accreditation framework integrating structured student engagement, transparent communication, and iterative action research cycles. These findings highlight the potential of accreditation as a continuous improvement system when aligned with collaborative governance and stakeholder participation.

Keywords

Accreditation, Action Research, Collaborative Quality Assurance

Downloads

References

1. Abdelhadi, A. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on academic accreditation. Journal of Public Health Research, 9(1_suppl), 1955. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2020.1955 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Butt, M. M., Huisman, J., Hussain, D., Alam, M., & Amin, M. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of students’ attitudes towards internationally accredited business schools: a signalling theory perspective. Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2021.1942388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210417515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2021). Essentials of critical participatory action research. In American Psychological Association eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000241-000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Flores, A. G., Fernando, C. D., De Rosas, E., & Manalo, R. (2026). Effects of accreditation in the professional development and work performance of the faculty members in Tomas Claudio Colleges. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(1), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.v2.i1.24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Forbes, M. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 22(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x211058251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gaston, P. L., & Ochoa, E. M. (2023). Higher education accreditation. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003445074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ito, H., Takeuchi, S., Yokoyama, K., Makita, Y., & Ishii, M. (2024). Impact of AACSB accreditation on education quality: perceptions of faculty in an accredited school in Japan. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(3), 769–785. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-05-2023-0258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kafaji, M. (2020). The perceived benefits of accreditation on students’ performance: The case of private business schools. Industry and Higher Education, 34(6), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220902698 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Morris, D. (2025). The faculty factor: Faculty engagement and retention in accreditation renewal. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 21(1), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2025.11.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nina. (2025, July 31). European Education Area (EEA) Strategic framework interim evaluation - ACA. ACA - the Academic Cooperation Association Is a Federation of National Organisations From Europe and Beyond, Which All Fund and Encourage the Internationalisation of Their Higher Education Systems. https://aca-secretariat.be/newsletter/european-education-area-eea-strategic-framework-interim-evaluation/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Reed, Jensen, E., Noles, S., Conneely, D., Kendall, H., Raley, M., Tarrant, A., Oakley, N., Hinson, C., Hoare, V., Marshall, K., & Pugliese, L. (2024). Analyzing who is relevant to engage in environmental decision-making processes by interests, influence and impact: The 3i framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Širec, K., & Rožman, M. (2025). Collaborative Leadership for quality assurance: A case study on developing a strategic quality manual in higher education. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles