Treasury Single Account Policy and Financial Administration in Public Tertiary Institutions in Oyo State, Nigeria: Implications for Institutional Autonomy, Operational Efficiency, And Internally Generated Revenue
Authors
Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Special and Professional Education, Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Oyo (Nigeria)
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Science Education, Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Oyo (Nigeria)
Directorate of Internal Audit, Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Oyo (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700549
Subject Category: Accounting
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 8023-8033
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-24
Accepted: 2026-07-29
Published: 2026-08-07
Abstract
This study examined the implications of Treasury Single Account implementation for financial administration in selected public tertiary institutions in Oyo State, Nigeria. Specifically, the study investigated the relationships among Treasury Single Account implementation, institutional autonomy, operational efficiency, internally generated revenue utilisation, and financial administration. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Data were collected from 120 academic and senior non-academic staff purposively selected from four state-owned tertiary institutions through a structured questionnaire. Instrument validity was established using expert review and Exploratory Factor Analysis (KMO = 0.79; Bartlett’s Test χ² = 892.40, p < 0.001), while reliability coefficients ranged from 0.76 to 0.86 (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and Multiple Linear Regression. The findings revealed that Treasury Single Account implementation significantly improves financial administration through enhanced accountability and transparency (β = 0.48, p < 0.001). However, Treasury Single Account implementation significantly reduces institutional autonomy (β = −0.31, p < 0.001) and flexibility in the utilisation of internally generated revenue (β = −0.22, p = 0.005). Operational efficiency demonstrated a modest positive contribution to financial administration (β = 0.29, p = 0.002). The regression model explained approximately 50% of the variance in financial administration (R² = 0.50). The study concluded that although Treasury Single Account implementation has strengthened public financial accountability, policy refinements are required to improve institutional responsiveness without compromising fiscal discipline. It is recommended that a differentiated Treasury Single Account framework be introduced to permit regulated access to internally generated revenue through ring-fenced subsidiary accounts supported by stringent auditing and accountability mechanisms.
Keywords
Treasury Single Account; financial administration; institutional autonomy; operational efficiency; internally generated revenue; public tertiary institutions; public financial management
Downloads
References
1. Accountant General of the Federation. (2017). Government records over N7 trillion in Treasury Single Account. Premium Times (news report), August 14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adebisi, J. F., & Okike, B. M. (2016). The adoption of Treasury Single Account (TSA) and its effect on revenue leakages of Nigerian states. American Research Journal of Business and Management, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Agbo, E. I., & Ocheni, S. (2017). Treasury Single Account (TSA) policy and its impact on the Nigerian economy. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 98–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Allen, R., Hemming, R., & Potter, B. H. (2013). The international handbook of public financial management. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Allison, P., & Ndukwe, O. J. (2021). Towards achieving public accountability in Nigeria public sectors: The role of Treasury Single Account. International Journal of Academic Accounting, Finance & Management Research, 5(10), 17–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Anikeze, N. H., Onyekwena, A. V., & Ezeh, C. O. (2025). The role of Treasury Single Account in fostering financial accountability and discipline in federal universities in South East Nigeria. Caritas International Journal of Public Administration and Business Management, 2(1), 34–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Anthony, R. N., & Young, D. W. (2003). Management control in nonprofit organisations (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Atolagbe, L. A., Afolabi, T. S., & Akinyede, O. M. (2026). Sustainable public sector fund management in Southwest Nigeria: An evaluation of the role of Treasury Single Account. African Journal of Applied Research, 12(1), 49–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Barr, M. J., & McClellan, G. S. (2018). Budgets and financial management in higher education (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119413456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organisational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. CBN. (2015). Communiqué No. 94 of the Monetary Policy Committee Meeting, March 24–25. Central Bank of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. de Boer, H., & Jongbloed, B. (2012). A cross-national comparison of higher education markets in Western Europe. In A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Vlasceanu, & L. Wilson (Eds.), European higher education at the crossroads (pp. 565–584). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3937-6_29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Eme, O. I., Chukwurah, D. C., & Iheanacho, E. N. (2015). An analysis of the pros and cons of Treasury Single Account policy in Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(4), 20–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ezeala, G., & Agbata, A. E. (2022). Effect of Treasury Single Account on government expenditure and borrowing: An empirical study. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 9(2), 40–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Fernandez, F., Fu, Y. C., Lin, Y. C., & Chykina, V. (2026). Examining institutional academic freedom and STEM research production in the OECD. International Journal of Educational Research, 136, 102915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2026.102915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Gbegi, D. O., Duenya, M. I., & Ipevnor, M. J. (2019). Effect of Treasury Single Account adoption on accountability, transparency and public finance management in Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Management Science, 7(1), 241–252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Iloeje, C., & Okwo, I. M. (2022). Effect of Treasury Single Account on government revenue, public cash management, federal account distribution and corruption control in Nigeria. International Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research, 4(5), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.52589/IJMER-ICCQNABM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Kurki, K. (2026). Global pilots and talent boost: Strategic funding for Finnish universities’ internationalisation in light of university autonomy. Higher Education Policy, 39(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00345-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Lane, J.-E. (2005). Public administration and public management: The principal-agent perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Nwadiani, C. O., & Emokpae, H. O. (2025). Perceived influence of Treasury Single Account on the funding of federal tertiary institutions in Delta and Edo States. International Business Education Journal, 18(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol18.2.3.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ofoegbu, F. I., & Alonge, H. O. (2016). Internally generated revenue (IGR) and effectiveness of university administration in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Oguwuike, O. E. (2025). The effects of the implementation of the Treasury Single Account (TSA) policy in Imo State University Owerri, Nigeria (2019–2023). African Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.58579/AJSBS.2025.15.4.3192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Okeke, N. L., Ezeala, G., Okoye, N. J., & Egbunike, C. F. (2023). Treasury Single Account (TSA) and cost of governance: Survey of MDAs in Anambra State. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 3(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Okerekeoti, C. U., & Okoye, E. I. (2016). Treasury Single Account (TSA) in Nigeria: A theoretical perspective. Proceedings of the International Conference on African Entrepreneurship and Innovation for Sustainable Development, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Sailendra Pattanayak, & Israel Fainboim. (2010). Treasury Single Account: Concept, design, and implementation issues. IMF Working Paper WP/10/143. International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp10143.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
- The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
- Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
- Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
- A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors