Trust, Usefulness, and Social Influence in Lifelong Learning Platform Adoption: Implications for Digital Citizenship and Well-Being among Elderly in Southern Thailand
Authors
Information Technology Department, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Fatoni University, Pattani, 94160 (Thailand)
Business Innovation Program, Faculty of Islamic Sciencs, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani 94000 (Thailand)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600747
Subject Category: Technology
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 10712-10731
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-17
Accepted: 2026-06-22
Published: 2026-07-06
Abstract
Thailand is considered a super-aged society, and older adults in the Muslim-majority provinces of Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat, remain among the least connected citizens in the entire country. This study investigates the extent to which aspects of digital platforms for lifelong learning in communities are acceptable to the Muslim elderly, and whether using the platforms in question results in increased digital citizenship and well-being. The study adopts the Technology Acceptance Model, the second version of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, and the Information Systems Success Model, and incorporates trust as a culturally embedded belief. The resulting model includes perceived platform quality, perceived usefulness and ease of use, social influence and facilitating conditions, and trust, and assesses their relationship to the intention to use the platform, and the resulting digital citizenship and well-being. A cross-sectional study targeting Muslim elderly populations (60+) was conducted and 386 surveys were completed with the use of community-based sampling methods. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson, and multiple regression. The findings indicated that perceived ease of use, and social influence, as well as trust and perceived usefulness predicted the intention to use the platform, which in turn increased digital citizenship and well-being to a large extent. The findings extend technology-adoption theory to a faith-based, low-resource ageing population and offer practical guidance for designing platforms that work with, rather than around, the region’s pondok schools, mosques, and study circles.
Keywords
lifelong learning; digital citizenship; well-being; Muslim elderly
Downloads
References
1. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ali, R. A., Soliman, M., Weahama, M. R., Assalihee, M., & Mahmud, I. (2025). Investigating continuous intention to use metaverse in higher education institutions: A dual-staged structural equation modeling-artificial neural network approach. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00357-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Aung, M. N., Koyanagi, Y., Nagamine, Y., Nam, E. W., Mulati, N., Kyaw, M. Y., Moolphate, S., Shirayama, Y., Nonaka, K., Field, M., Cheung, P., & Yuasa, M. (2022). Digitally inclusive, healthy aging communities (DIHAC): A cross-cultural study in Japan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 6976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19126976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using GPower 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41*(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Guner, H., & Acarturk, C. (2020). The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: A comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hassama, A., Soliman, M., & Noipom, T. (2024). Antecedents of individuals’ switching intention to adopt Sharia compliance in fintech transactions among Generation Y: A case of Thai southern border provinces. In 2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS) (pp. 796–800). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hauk, N., Hüffmeier, J., & Krumm, S. (2018). Ready to be a silver surfer? A meta-analysis on the relationship between chronological age and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hoque, R., & Sorwar, G. (2017). Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 101, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Huang, H., Zhu, J., Chen, J., Qin, Y., & Chen, S. (2025). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of online medical services by older adults: A modified UTAUT2 based study. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1559701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1559701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Jantavongso, S. (2022). Toward global digital literate citizens: A case of Thailand’s aging generation. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 88(2), e12207. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12207 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Khalid, J., Mi, C., Soliman, M., Abbasi, G. A., & Ali, A. J. (2025). Augmenting humanity: Industry 5.0 and the rise of human-machine collaboration. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83708-276-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Liu, J. Y. W., Sorwar, G., Rahman, M. S., & Hoque, M. R. (2023). The role of trust and habit in the adoption of mHealth by older adults in Hong Kong: A healthcare technology service acceptance (HTSA) model. BMC Geriatrics, 23, 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03779-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Macedo, I. M. (2017). Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: An empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 935–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Martín-García, A. V., Redolat, R., & Pinazo-Hernandis, S. (2022). Factors influencing intention to technological use in older adults: The TAM model application. Research on Aging, 44(7–8), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275211063797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Millard, A., Baldassar, L., & Wilding, R. (2018). The significance of digital citizenship in the well-being of older migrants. Public Health, 158, 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: Employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708–726. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pihlainen, K., Korjonen-Kuusipuro, K., & Kärnä, E. (2021). Perceived benefits from non-formal digital training sessions in later life: Views of older adult learners, peer tutors, and teachers. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 40(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2021.1919768 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Pituk, P., Chutipattana, N., Laor, P., Sukdee, T., Kittikun, J., Jitwiratnukool, W., Fajriyah, R., & Saisanan Na Ayudhaya, W. (2025). Digital media victimization among older adults in upper-southern Thailand. Informatics, 12(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12010016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Schroeder, T., Dodds, L., Georgiou, A., Gewald, H., & Siette, J. (2023). Older adults and new technology: Mapping review of the factors associated with older adults’ intention to adopt digital technologies. JMIR Aging, 6, e44564. https://doi.org/10.2196/44564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Sen, K., Prybutok, G., & Prybutok, V. R. (2022). The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review. SSM - Population Health, 17, 101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Soliman, M., Ali, R. A., Khalid, J., Mahmud, I., & Ali, W. B. (2025). Modelling continuous intention to use generative artificial intelligence as an educational tool among university students: Findings from PLS-SEM and ANN. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00333-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Soliman, M., Ali, R. A., Khalid, J., Mahmud, I., & Assalihee, M. (2023). Modeling the continuous intention to use the metaverse as a learning platform: PLS-SEM and fsQCA approach. In M. A. Al-Sharafi, M. Al-Emran, G. W.-H. Tan, & K.-B. Ooi (Eds.), Current and future trends on intelligent technology adoption (Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 1128, pp. 41–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48397-4_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Soliman, M., Ali, R. A., & Noipom, T. (2025). Unlocking AI-powered tools adoption among university students: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00357-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Soliman, M., Ali Abdelwahed, R. A., Mahmud, I., Hayeemad, M., & Khalid, J. (2025). Ethical and societal considerations of AI in business. In Human-machine collaboration (pp. 83–104). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83708-276-620251005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Soliman, M., Assalihee, M., Weahama, M. R., & Ali, R. A. (2024). Predicting continuous intention to use e-learning platforms among university students: An integrated model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.12.2203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Soliman, M., Hayeemad, M., Nuh, R., & Phetkaew, C. (2025). Investigating factors affecting purchase intention of halal cosmetics products among millennial consumers: Findings from PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-06-2024-0264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Soliman, M., & Karia, N. (2025). Investigating ERP readiness enablers and inhibitors among Egyptian higher education institutions. Global Business Review, 22(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920988652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Soliman, M., Noipom, T., Wae-u-Seng, N., & Hama, I. (2025). Modeling emotional intelligence and organizational ambidexterity among academic leaders in higher education institutions. In The role of emotional intelligence and artificial intelligence in organizations (pp. 123–141). Productivity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Sriwisathiyakun, K., & Dhamanitayakul, C. (2022). Enhancing digital literacy with an intelligent conversational agent for senior citizens in Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6251–6271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10862-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., & Creemers, M. (2003). Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Vaportzis, E., Clausen, M. G., & Gow, A. J. (2017). Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: A focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Wu, C., & Lim, G. G. (2024). Investigating older adults users’ willingness to adopt wearable devices by integrating the technology acceptance model (UTAUT2) and the Technology Readiness Index theory. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1449594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1449594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Yang, H. J., Lee, J.-H., & Lee, W. (2025). Factors influencing health care technology acceptance in older adults based on the technology acceptance model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e65269. https://doi.org/10.2196/65269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- LeafQuest: A Mobile-Based Augmented Reality for Plant Placement, Discovery, and Growth
- Participatory Ergonomic Intervention Approach on Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) in Construction Sectors: A Systematic Review
- Integrating GIS into Traffic Incident Management: A Web-Based System
- RideSmart: A Personalized Motorcycle Product Recommendation System Using TF-IDF and Descriptive Analytics for Javidson Motorshop
- Educational Technology Course Design in Pre-Service Teachers Education: A Bibliometric Review of the Research Landscape