Understanding Academic Writing Difficulties in Higher Education: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Review across Linguistic, Psychological, Pedagogical, and Contextual Dimensions

Academic writing is a core competency in higher education, yet students across disciplines and educational contexts continue to experience persistent difficulties that affect academic performance and progression. These difficulties are widely acknowledged as multidimensional, extending beyond surface-level language problems to include psychological, pedagogical, and contextual influences. Despite a growing body of research, existing studies remain fragmented, often addressing these dimensions in isolation rather than through an integrated perspective. To address this gap, this systematic literature review aimed to synthesize empirical evidence on academic writing difficulties in higher education by examining linguistic, psychological, pedagogical, and contextual dimensions in a unified framework. Guided by the PRISMA protocol, a systematic search was conducted using two major academic databases, Scopus and Web of Science. Advanced keyword combinations—academic writing, higher education, strategies, and difficulties—were applied to ensure comprehensive coverage. The initial search yielded 861 records, comprising 618 from Scopus and 243 from Web of Science. Following duplicate removal, screening, eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal, 24 primary studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. The findings reveal consistent patterns across contexts: linguistically, students struggle with academic vocabulary, grammatical accuracy, text organization, and genre conventions; psychologically, low self-efficacy, writing anxiety, and fragile academic identity significantly influence engagement with writing tasks; pedagogically, fragmented instruction and limited feedback constrain writing development, while process-oriented and scaffolded approaches show positive outcomes; contextually, disciplinary norms, assessment regimes, linguistic backgrounds, and emerging technological environments shape both expectations and challenges. Overall, the systematic literature review (SLR) demonstrates that academic writing difficulties in higher education are complex and interdependent rather than isolated skill deficits. By integrating evidence across four dimensions, this review contributes a comprehensive understanding that can inform curriculum design, instructional practices, and institutional support systems, while also providing a robust foundation for future research on academic writing development in diverse higher education contexts.

academic writing, higher education, writing difficulties. Instructional strategies

1. Abouzahra, A., Sabraoui, A., & Afdel, K. (2020). Model composition in Model Driven Engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 125(May), 106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aldayel, H. S., Pravitasari, H., & Fadillah, N. (2026). Factors affecting academic writing difficulties among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) university students. Acta Psychologica, 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alzahrani, N. M. (2020). Augmented reality: A Systematic review of its benefits and challenges in e-learning contexte. Appl. Sci, 10(16). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amo Sánchez-Fortún, J. M. D., Baldrich, K., Domínguez-Oller, J. C., & Pérez-García, C. (2024). Writing in the discipline of education: beliefs of future teachers regarding their academic literacy. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1422120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Apridayani, A. (2026). Thai novice researchers’ self-efficacy, writing difficulties, and awareness of academic rigor. Acta Psychologica, 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bala, I., & Mitchell, L. (2024). Thematic exploration of educational research after the COVID pandemic through topic modelling. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Benton Z, A. M., & Marwah, S. (2024). The Challenges of Writing: The ‘Long and Winding Road’ of Belonging to Academia. Knowledge Cultures, 12(1), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.22381/kc121202412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bram, B., & Angelina, P. (2022). Indonesian Tertiary Education Students’ Academic Writing Setbacks and Solutions. International Journal of Language Education, 6(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i3.22043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cañizares, F. I., & Rossana Ramírez-Ávila, M. (2023). AtoZ novas práticas em informação e conhecimento Peer Feedback and its impact on university students’ writing performance Retroalimentação entre pares e seu impacto no desempenho de escrita de estudantes universitários. https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v13.90734 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Caser, A. L., Nievera, M. A. C., Bautista, L. N. N., Flores, F. T., Amla, A. B., & Patacsil, F. F. (2025). Structural Errors and Cognitive Challenges in Academic Writing: A Study of First-Year BSEd-English Students in Eastern Pangasinan Using Text Analytics. International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 33(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v33i01/75-95 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dianastiti, F. E., Suwandi, S., & Setiawan, B. (2024). Contributing Factors and Challenges in Mastering Academic Writing Skills: Multiple Case Studies of Deaf Students in Inclusive Universities in Indonesia. International Journal of Language Education, 8(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i1.60905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Du, T. T., Dung, D. T. B., Ly, H. T. B., Huang, N. T. K., Triet, D. M., & Xuan, N. T. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: A Case at a University in Vietnam. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 122–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. . College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gholiagha, S., Neyer, J., Sienknecht, M., Wolska, M. A., Kiesel, D., Riehmann, P., Voigt, J., Wiegmann, M., López García, I., Girgensohn, K., Stein, B., & Froehlich, B. (2025). From annotation to reflection: how participatory AI training enhances critical thinking. AI and Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02539-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gupta, S., Jaiswal, A., Paramasivam, A., & Kotecha, J. (2022). Academic Writing Challenges and Supports: Perspectives of International Doctoral Students and Their Supervisors. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.891534 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jiang, S., Lee, K.-F., & Ang, C.-S. (2022). Chinese ESL Students’ Perceptions of Academic Writing in English in Malaysian Universities. PASAA, 63, 93–122. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132264037&partnerID=40&md5=c95634ce33f55e156270823dc1c2689e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khatami, M., Calafato, R., Sabeki, F., Sharmin, S., & Çelik, F. (2025). Navigating Writing Anxiety: Sources and Coping Strategies of University Students in Bangladesh. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 55(3–4), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2025.2558506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Laohasawad, N., & Somphong, M. (2025). Writing Problems of Thai Candidates for Academic Writing Tasks in IELTS Standardized Test. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(2), 519–549. https://doi.org/10.70730/OWZX2270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lavado-Puente, C. S., Rivera-Aquino, J. A., Lavado-Meza, C. R., & Marca-Cano, S. R. (2025). Investigación científica: dificultades en la redacción de proyectos de investigación de estudiantes de una filial universitaria en Chanchamayo (Perú). Formación Universitaria, 18(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062025000100053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Le, T. T. T., & Nguyen, N. T. T. (2025). Exploring psychological challenges in higher education: Prevalence, causes, and impacts on student well-being and academic performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 13(4), 1246–1257. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v13i4.4405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Li, H., & Haddon, E. (2025). Discipline-specific language challenges faced by Chinese music student-teachers on a UK master’s programme. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1631328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Li, M. (2024). Non-native English-speaking (NNES) students’ English academic writing experiences in higher education: A meta-ethnographic qualitative synthesis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Listyani. (2025). EFL Students’ Challenges & Solutions During and After the Pandemic: A Four-Year Study in an Academic Writing Class. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(1), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1501.25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mahmud, F. A., & Rahman, M. A. U. (2023). Academic Writing of Saudi Graduate Students: Issues and Improvements. Arab World English Journal, 14(1), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no1.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Miller, K., & Hulcup, C. (2025). From Theory to Practice: Addressing the Academic Writing Challenges of International Students. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 74(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2025.2516803 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, A. D. (2009). PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. In The PRISMA statement (Vol. 6, p. 1000097). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mudau, P. P., Cekiso, M., & Mandende, I. P. (2025). First-year students’ perceptions of factors affecting academic writing. Reading and Writing (South Africa), 16(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v16i1.567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mumin, M. A. (2022). International Postgraduates‟ Perception on Academic Writing: A Lesson on Criticality. World Journal of English Language, 12(4), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n4p46 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mustafa, A., Arbab, A. N., & El Sayed, A. A. (2022). Difficulties in Academic Writing in English as a Second/Foreign Language from the Perspective of Undergraduate Students in Higher Education Institutions in Oman. Arab World English Journal, 13(3), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Osman, O. H., Rahbi, A. H. A., Binayan, C., & Abuoaf, M. (2025). EFL Students’ Academic Writing Challenges at the Foundation Programme in the University of Nizwa: Challenges and Remedy. Arab World English Journal, 16(1), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no1.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Peralta, M. R. (2023). Dificultades sociodiscursivas para la escritura académica en estudiantes universitarios de pregrado y posgrado. Lengua y Sociedad, 22(2), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i2.23883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Shakhsi Dastgahian, E. (2025). Multilingual Master’s Students’ Perceptions of Academic Writing Development in the Context of Collective Research Supervision in Australian Higher Education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shamsi, A. F., & Vanci Osam, U. V. (2024). Scholarly Writing Experiences of Doctoral Students as Nonnative Speakers of English: Encountered Challenges and Needed Support. Arab World English Journal, 15(4), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no4.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Teixeira, J. S. de S., Sousa, E. de P., & Vasconcelos, F. D. S. (2023). ABC TO UNDERGRADUATE THESIS: LITERACY PROCESS AND ITS IMPACTS ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS FROM PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Margens, 17(29), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.18542/rmi.v17i29.10710 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vovou, E. (2023). Academic writing as sociolinguistic practice: The case of academic writing in foreign language studies. Training, Language and Culture, 7(4), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-4-9-15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vroom, V. (1964). Work and Motivation. Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zhang, S., & Hasim, Z. (2023). Perceptions and Coping Strategies in English Writing Among Chinese Study-Abroad Graduate Students. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231184851 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Exploration of Stakeholders Perceived Mitigation Measures for Addressing Sanitation Challenges in George Compound in Lusaka Zambia
• Public Participation in Sustainable Development Programs: Examining Public Participation Methods and Levels at Pustaka Negeri Sarawak
• Responding to Climate Change through Livelihood Diversification: Implications of Household Economic Well-Being in Coastal Greater Accra
• Teacher Character Development Through Virtue and Eudaimonia: Insights from Nominal Group Technique (NGT)
• Transformation of Muslim Friendly Hospitality: An Overview of Shariah Compliant Tourism Development in Malaysia