Understanding the Nature of Science (NoS) for Elementary School Students Based on Gender
Authors
Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Pelita Bangsa (Indonesia)
Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Pelita Bangsa (Indonesia)
Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Pelita Bangsa (Indonesia)
Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Pelita Bangsa (Indonesia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100397
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 5027-5035
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-26
Accepted: 2025-12-04
Published: 2025-12-12
Abstract
This research examines elementary school students' understanding of the Nature of Science (NoS) based on gender. The purpose of this study is to identify and analyse the level of understanding of male and female students regarding NoS concepts, which are an important foundation in science learning. This study uses a descriptive quantitative approach with a survey method to obtain students' understanding of NoS. The sampling technique was carried out through purposive sampling by considering certain characteristics relevant to the research objectives. The research sample consisted of upper elementary school students in the West Java region. The research instrument was a questionnaire containing 47 positive and negative statements with a Likert scale based on the components of NoS, namely scientific knowledge, scientific process, and scientific attitude, which had been developed through literature review and expert validation to explore students' understanding of various aspects of NoS. The results showed that male students obtained an average score of 66, while female students obtained an average score of 65. The difference between these figures was very small, indicating that there was no significant difference in NoS understanding between male and female students. These findings show that NoS understanding is not determined by gender. This study has limitations because it only focused on one region, so the results do not reflect the broader situation. Therefore, further research is recommended to be conducted with a larger geographical coverage and considering other categories such as interests, place of residence, class level, profession and other categories. With a broader research coverage, a more comprehensive reprecentation of students' understanding of NoS in Indonesia is expected to be obtained.
Keywords
Elementary School Students, Gender, Nature of Science
Downloads
References
1. Adi, Y. K., & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Pada Guru dan Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edukasi Journal, 10(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.31603/EDUKASI.V10I1.1831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adiastuty, N., Waluya, S. B., Junaedi, I., Masrukan, M., & Putri, C. M. (2020). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif dan Gender Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa. 756–764. http://pps.unnes.ac.id/pps2/prodi/prosiding-pascasarjana-unnes [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adibelli-Sahin, E., & Deniz, H. (2017). Elementary teachers’ perceptions about the effective features of explicit-reflective nature of science instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 761–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1308035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Almeida, B., Santos, M., & Justi, R. (2023). Aspects and Abilities of Science Literacy in the Context of Nature of Science Teaching. Science and Education, 32(3), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00324-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Alshamrani, S. M. (2008). Context, Accuracy, and Level of Inclusion of NAture of Science Concepts in Current High School Physics Textbooks. In A dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degee of Doctor of Philosopy in Curriculum & Instruction. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Amador-Rodríguez, R., Adúriz-Bravo, A., Valencia-Cobo, J. A., Reinoso-Tapia, R., & Delgado-Iglesias, J. (2021). Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.1271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Anane, N. M., & Lomotey, V. A. (2023). Perceptions of the Impact Of Availability and Utilisation of Laboratory Facilities On Science Teacher-Trainees’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Improvisation In Science. Advanced Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 51–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. https://doi.org/10.31098/AJOSED.V1I1.1568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Atakan, M., & Akçay, B. (2022). Representation of Changes about Nature of Science in Turkish Middle School Science Textbooks. Science & Education 2022 33:3, 33(3), 551–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-022-00403-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cahyana, C. (2025). Understanding the Nature of Science for Elementary School Students in Rural, Suburban, and Urban Areas. Advanced Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. https://doi.org/10.31098/ajosed.v3i1.2990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Chaiyabang, M. K., & Thathong, K. (2014). Enhancing Thai Teacher’s Understanding and Instruction of the Nature of Science. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Go, A. N., & Quicho, R. F. (2023). Perceived Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Motivated Strategies for Learning of Year 1 and Year 2 Students in Cita Hati Christian Senior High School, Surabaya Indonesia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), VII(2454), 1175–1189. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hacieminoglu, E. (2014). In-service Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding their Practices Related to Integrating Nature of Science: Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1268–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hamzah, A. M. (2023). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) as A Measurement for Student Mathematics Assessment Development. 12 Waiheru, 9(2), 189–196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. https://doi.org/10.47655/12waiheru.v9i2.144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Hardianty, N. (2015). Nature of Science : Bagian Penting Dari Literasi Sains. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Sains 2015 (SNIPS 2015), 2015(Snips), 441–444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Hayati Rahayu, A., Sebelas April Sumedang, S., Angkrek Situ No, J., Ari Widodo Pendidikan Biologi, S., & Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, F. (2019). Understanding of Nature of Science Pre-Service Students and Elementary School Teachers in the Digital Age. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 9(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.30998/FORMATIF.V9I2.3251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Hisanah, N., Koeshandayanto, S., & Sulur, S. (2025). Eksplorasi Literasi Sains Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gender pada Materi Besaran dan Pengukuran Kelas X SMA. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i1.6572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2014). Analysis of Nature of Science Included in Recent Popular Writing Using Text Mining Techniques. Science and Education, 23(9), 1785–1809. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-014-9703-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Jufri, A. W., Nirmala, S. A., Munib, M., & Dewi, E. S. (2025). Pengetahuan Hakikat Sains (Nature of Sains - NoS) Siswa SMP Negeri dan SMP Islam: Tinjauan Berdasarkan Gender. Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i1.14530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Jumanto, J., & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains oleh Siswa Dan Guru SD di Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.32585/JKP.V2I1.61 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Kapsala, N., Galani, A., & Mavrikaki, E. (2022). Nature of Science in Greek Secondary School Biology Textbooks. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Khishfe, R. (2017). Consistency of nature of science views across scientific and socio-scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4), 403–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1287976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Kinskey, M. (2023). The Importance of Teaching Nature of Science: Exploring Preservice Teachers’ Views and Instructional Practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(3), 307–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2100730;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:USTE20;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.10034;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:10982736;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Lorsbach, A. W., Meyer, A. A., & Arias, A. M. (2019). The Correspondence of Charles Darwin as a Tool for Reflecting on Nature of Science. Science & Education 2019 28:9, 28(9), 1085–1103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-019-00080-Y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. McComas, W. F. (2015). The Nature of Science & the Next Generation of Biology Education. The American Biology Teacher, 77(7), 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1525/ABT.2015.77.7.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Nugraheny, D. C., & Widodo, A. (2021). Jurnal Visipena Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran. Jurnal Visipena, 12(1), 111–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Savira, D. L., & Bahij, A. Al. (2025). The Effect of Augmented Reality-Based Learning Media on Collaboration and Critical Thinking Skills of Fifth Grade Students in Human Circulatory System Topic at SD Muhammadiyah 12 Pamulang. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3s), 5412–5418. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i3sp5412-5418.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Setya Novanto, Y., Djudin, T., Yani, A., Basith, A., & Murdani, E. (2021). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Ipa Pada Siswa SekolahDasar Berdasarkan Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Siswati, B. H., Susilo, H., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Pengaruh Gender terhadap Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik IPA dan Biologi di Malang. In Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM (Vol. 1, pp. 748–755). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Suratmi, & Widodo, A. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran NoS Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman NoS Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(2), 215–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Temel, S., Şen, Ş., & Özcan, Ö. (2018). The development of the nature of science view scale (NOSvs) at university level. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(1), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1338251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Tursinawati, T., & Widodo, A. (2019). Pemahaman Nature of Science (NoS) Di Era Digital: Perspektif Dari Mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 3(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v3i1.13294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Utami, C., & Anitra, R. (2020). Jurnal Kependidikan : Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Berdasarkan Gender pada Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education Berbantuan Alat Peraga PANDU Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar , Departemen PGSD , STKIP Singkawang Corresponding Author. 6(3), 475–489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam: Dasar-Dasar Untuk Praktik. UPI Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Widodo, A., Jumanto, J., Adi, Y. K., & Imran, M. E. (2019). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains (NOS) oleh Siswa dan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 237–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.27294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. William F. McComas. (2017). Understanding how science works: the nature of science as the foundation for science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 98(365), 71–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Yanuar, Y., & Widodo, A. (2020). Pengaruh Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Nature of Science terhadap Pemahaman Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 11(1), 10–18. http://dx.doi.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study