Understanding Work Engagement Among Private University Lecturers: The Roles of Job Demands, Job Resources, and Basic Psychological Needs
Authors
Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia (Indonesia)
Faculty of Business and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601426
Subject Category: Organizational Psychology
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 20780-20789
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-04
Accepted: 2026-07-09
Published: 2026-07-22
Abstract
Work engagement has become an important indicator of employee well-being and organizational effectiveness in higher education institutions. However, maintaining high levels of work engagement among private university lecturers remains a significant challenge due to increasing job demands, limited organizational resources, and psychological pressures associated with academic responsibilities. Although the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) model has been widely used to explain work engagement, previous studies have primarily focused on the direct effects of job demands and job resources while paying limited attention to the underlying psychological mechanisms through which these factors influence lecturers' engagement. Drawing upon the Job Demands–Resources Theory and Self-Determination Theory, this conceptual paper proposes an integrated framework that explains the relationships among job demands, job resources, basic psychological needs, and work engagement. Specifically, the paper argues that job resources enhance lecturers' work engagement by satisfying their needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, whereas excessive job demands may undermine the fulfillment of these psychological needs, leading to lower work engagement. Basic psychological needs are therefore proposed as a mediating mechanism linking the work environment with employee engagement. The proposed framework contributes to the organizational psychology literature by integrating two complementary theoretical perspectives to better understand work engagement in the context of private higher education institutions. In addition, the model offers practical implications for university leaders and human resource practitioners in designing organizational policies that strengthen lecturers' psychological well-being and sustainable work engagement. Future empirical studies are recommended to validate the proposed conceptual model using structural equation modeling across different higher education settings.
Keywords
Work engagement; Job demands; Job resources; Basic psychological needs; Self-Determination Theory; Job Demands–Resources Theory; Private university lecturers
Downloads
References
1. Ainun, A. (2024). Higher education statistics in Indonesia. Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & de Wit, H. (2019). Responding to massification: Differentiation in postsecondary education worldwide. Sense Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands–Resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bothma, F. C., & Roodt, G. (2013). The validation of the turnover intention scale. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The Job Demands–Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Galanakis, M., & Tsitouri, E. (2022). Job demands, job resources, and work engagement: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 12(5), 139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members' morale and their intention to leave. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518–542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kinman, G. (2014). Doing more with less? Work and wellbeing in academics. Somatechnics, 4(2), 219–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Naidoo-Chetty, M., & du Plessis, M. (2021). Job demands and job resources of academics in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 631171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Salmi, J. (2021). Tertiary education and the Sustainable Development Goals. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Work engagement: What do we know and where do we go? Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(1), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Shuck, B., & Wollard, K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Teixeira, P. N., & Dill, D. D. (Eds.). (2011). Public vices, private virtues? Assessing the effects of marketization in higher education. Sense Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory's basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]