Unlocking the Future: Factors Driving Cognitive Readiness to Adopt AI among Postgraduate Diploma in Education Students

Along with the booming development of the digital world and technology, the educational landscape around the world is undergoing an aggressive transformation. To meet current needs, the trend of using artificial intelligence (AI) is being actively promoted in Malaysia, including Sabah. Therefore, a cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted to assess the AI readiness among of 115 postgraduate Diploma in Education students from Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Respondent was selected through a simple random sampling technique. Descriptive analysis and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) were used to analyse survey response. The results indicated that AI TPACK anda motivation has positive effects on cognitive readiness to use AI. Further findings revealed that gender moderates the relationship between AI TPACK and cognitive readiness, where this relationship is strengthened among male teachers. By identifying key drivers of readiness to use AI, the study informs academic policymakers anda pedagogical practices in understanding the most effective strategies for enhance prospective teacher cognitive readiness to accept and adapt AI in real classroom.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), prospective teacher

1. Al-Mughairi, H., & Bhaskar, P. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of AI techniques in higher education: Insights from teachers' perspectives on ChatGPT. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2024-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bello, J., Concon, L., Polache, M. C. C., Ayaton, M. J., Manlicayan, R., Campomanes, J., & Saro, J. (2023). Contextualized and localized science teaching and learning materials and its characteristics to improve students' learning performance. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7607686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Collie, R. J. (2023). Teachers’ works motivation: Examining perceived leadership practices and salient outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, Article 104348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2024). Teachers’ motivation and engagement to harness generative AI for teaching and learning: The role of contextual, occupational, and background factors. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Crameri, L., Hettiarachchi, I., & Hanoun, S. (2021). A review of individual operational cognitive readiness: Theory development and future directions. Human Factors, 63(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819868409 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fathi, J., & Ebadi, S. (2020). Exploring EFL pre-service teachers’ adoption of technology in a CALL program: Obstacles, motivators, and maintenance. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3897–3917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10189-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gasparini, F., Grossi, A., Giltri, M., Nishinari, K., & Bandini, S. (2023). Behavior and task classification using wearable sensor data: A study across different ages. Sensors, 23(6), 3225. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ghoni, R. (2025). AI dalam pendidikan: Transformasi dan masa hadapan. Dewan Masyarakat, 02/2025. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Guan, L., Zhang, Y., & Gu, M. M. (2025). Pre-service teacher preparedness for AI-integrated education: An investigation from perceptions, capabilities, and teachers’ identity changes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Leasr Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PL-SEM) 2nd Edition. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jose, J., & Jose, B. (2024). Educators’ academic insights on artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(2), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.5.3272 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lee, I., & Perret, B. (2022). Preparing high school teachers to integrate AI methods into STEM classrooms. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(11), 12783–12791. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Li, M., & Zhang, H. (2024). A study on the behavioral intention of primary and secondary school teachers using generative artificial intelligence in teaching. In 2024 the 9th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL 2024) (pp. 1–7). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3675812.3675870 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lin, Y. S., & Lai, Y. H. (2021). Analysis of AI precision education strategy for small private online courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 749629. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.749629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., & van der Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized education in the artificial intelligence era: What to expect next. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2021.3055032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Martin, F., Min, Z. & Schaefer, D. (2024). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in k-12 education (2017–2022). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Morrison, J. E., & Fletcher, J. D. (2002). Cognitive readiness. U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.1037/e431002005-001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ning, Y., Zhang, C., Xu, B., Zhou, Y., & Wijaya, T. T. (2024). Teachers’ AI-TPACK: Exploring the relationship between knowledge elements. Sustainability, 16(3), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030978 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Park, M., & Son, J. B. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1815649 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Park, J., Teo, T. W., Teo, A., Chang, J., Huang, J. S., & Koo, S. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence into science lessons: Teachers’ experiences and views. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00454-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rais, R. A., & Rashid, S. M. (2023). Practice knowledge of the use of teaching technologymaterials among preschool teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(3), 755–763. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i3/18003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Russo, C., Romano, L., Clemente, D., Iacovone, L., Gladwin, T. E., & Panno, A. (2025). Gender differences in artificial intelligence: The role of artificial intelligenceanxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1559457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sila, C., William, C., Yunus, M., & Rafiq, K. (2023). Exploring students’ perception of using ChatGPT in higher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12), 4044–4054. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/20250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tahiru, F. (2021). AI in education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2021010101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Velander, J., Taiye, M., Otero, N., & Milrad, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in K–12 education: Eliciting and reflecting on Swedish teachers' understanding of AI and its implications for teaching & learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 4085–4105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11990-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Vermote, B., Aelterman, N., Beyers, W., Aper, L., Buysschaert, F., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). The role of teachers’ motivation and mindsets in predicting a (de)motivating teaching style in higher education: A circumplex approach. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09827-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wang, J., Hwang, G. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). Directions of the 100 most cited chatbot-related human behavior research: A review of academic publications. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study