Upper Echelons in Crisis: Do Executive Characteristics Drive Firm Value in the Primary Sector During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified uncertainty in Indonesia's primary sector, making executive leadership an increasingly important determinant of firm resilience and market valuation. Grounded in Upper Echelons Theory (UET), this study investigates the influence of CEO characteristics—education, tenure, and age—on firm value and examines whether the COVID-19 pandemic strengthens these relationships. The study employs a quantitative approach using balanced panel data from 80 mining and agricultural companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) over the period 2015–2024 (800 firm-year observations). Firm value is measured using Tobin's Q, while CEO education, tenure, and age serve as the independent variables. The COVID-19 pandemic is modeled as a moderating dummy variable, with firm size, leverage, and profitability included as control variables. Panel data regression with the Fixed Effect Model (FEM) and robust standard errors is applied following model specification and diagnostic tests. The findings reveal that CEO education and CEO tenure have significant positive effects on firm value, whereas CEO age has no significant influence. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly strengthens the positive relationships between CEO education and firm value as well as between CEO tenure and firm value, indicating that leadership quality becomes more valuable during periods of heightened uncertainty. These findings extend the application of Upper Echelons Theory to emerging markets by demonstrating that investors place greater value on executives with superior cognitive and experiential capabilities during systemic crises. The study provides practical implications for corporate boards, investors, and policymakers in strengthening executive selection and corporate governance strategies to enhance organizational resilience.

Corporate Governance

1. Adams, R. B., & Mehran, H. (2012). Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(2), 243–267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, M., & Ng, Y. L. (2022). CEO characteristics and firm valuation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 51, 100871. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Armashita, A. R. (2026). Entrepreneur Characteristics and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Indonesian Entrepreneur Chamber (KEIND) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Sebelas Maret. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., & Terry, S. J. (2020). COVID-induced economic uncertainty. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 26983. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Beber, B., & Brandt, M. W. (2009). The effect of macroeconomic news on belief dispersion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(2), 279–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on corporate policy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S., Mizen, P., Smietanka, P., & Thwaites, G. (2019). The impact of Brexit on UK firms. National Bureau of Economic Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, G., Hou, W., & Turk, R. (2023). CEO tenure and firm value: The role of managerial entrenchment versus experience. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). Innovation and firm growth: Does age and size matter? Research Policy, 43(2), 449–462. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Custódio, C., & Metzger, D. (2013). Financial expert CEOs: CEO’s work experience and firm’s financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), 440–457. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Darmadi, S. (2013). Board members' education and firm performance: Evidence from a developing economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(2), 113–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. The American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gottesman, A. A., & Morey, M. R. (2010). CEO educational background and firm financial performance. Journal of Applied Finance, 20(2), 70–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Puri, M. (2013). Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 103–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Guenther, T., & Guenther, E. (2019). Can we trust Tobin’s Q? Lessons from the measurement of organizational performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 304–317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Henderson, A. D., Miller, D., & Hambrick, D. C. (2006). How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5), 447–460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2005). CEO experiences: Effects on the choice of FDI entry mode. Journal of Management Studies, 42(4), 755–778. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hu, C., & Liu, Y. J. (2015). Valuing smells: Asset pricing with information. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(3), 549–572. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Huang, Y., & Mazouz, K. (2018). Excess cash, CEO characteristics, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 728–750. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. IMF. (2022). World Economic Outlook: War Sets Back the Global Recovery. International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kaplan, S. N., Klebanov, M. M., & Sorensen, M. (2012). Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 973–1007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Khanna, P., & Jones, C. D. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the primary sector: A global perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(3), 645–668. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Miller, D. (1991). Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 37(1), 34–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nguyen, P., Rahman, N., & Zhao, R. (2018). CEO characteristics and firm value: A study of Australian listed firms. Accounting & Finance, 58, 101–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Peni, E. (2014). CEO and Chairperson characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 185–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Quigley, T. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2015). Has the "CEO effect" increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in asset prices. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 821–830. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 653–662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Statista. (2024). Commodity Price Indices: 2015-2024. Statista Database. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tolikas, K., & Callonnec, M. (2023). Managerial characteristics and performance of eurozone mutual funds. Journal of Financial Research, 46(2), 237–262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Waldman, D. A., Javidan, M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A relationship to environmental uncertainty and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 355–381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. World Bank. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 on Global Value Chains. World Bank Group Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wulf, J. (2007). Influence, information and the capital-budgeting process. Journal of Business, 80(1), 311–347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zhao, H., O’Connor, G., Wu, J., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2021). Age and entrepreneurial career success: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(6), 106148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study