Usage of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Learning Effectiveness among Students in the Introduction to Service Management Course: A Concept Paper

Authors

Mohammad Zaim Mohd Salleh

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Nor Sara Nadia Muhamad Yunus

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600937

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 13353-13361

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-21

Accepted: 2026-06-26

Published: 2026-07-09

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are now an integral aspect of digital transformation in higher education as universities continue to support blended, flexible and technology enhanced learning in the post COVID-19 environment. MOOCs provide wide access to course content, interactive assessments and scalable course delivery. The educational impact of MOOCs is yet to be empirically investigated. Recent research has identified factors that influence MOOC outcomes such as learner engagement, motivation, platform quality, self-regulated learning, teaching presence, social interaction, and perceived value. The value of MOOCs is particularly relevant to business and management education where students are able to translate conceptual knowledge into practical skills in the areas of service quality, customer experience, service recovery and operational workflows. Although MOOCs have great potential, few studies have investigated the association between MOOC use and learning effectiveness in the Introduction to Service Management course. This concept paper proposes a quantitative study to measure the effect of MOOC use on the learning effectiveness of students enrolled in this course. Drawing on the Community of Inquiry framework and the recent literature on online learning, the paper defines the usage of MOOCs in terms of frequency of use, content quality, accessibility, interactivity, self-paced learning and engagement. Learning effectiveness is conceptualised in terms of perceived knowledge acquisition, conceptual understanding, application ability, learning satisfaction, academic confidence and performance improvement. The proposed study will contribute theoretically to scholarship on digital learning and practically to the refinement of curriculum design, MOOC development, and blended learning implementation.

Keywords

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC), Learning Effectiveness, Service Management, Student Engagement, Online Learning

Downloads

References

1. Abdullah, M. N. L. Y., Fen, T. S., Samsudin, M. A., Ying, S. T., & Yuan, F. C. (2024). Factors Influencing Undergraduate Students’ Online Learning Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241261834 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S. O., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H. I., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on student’s performance and engagement: a systematic review. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azevedo, B., Lencastre, J. A., & Magalhaes, P. (2024). Massive open online courses in higher education: Student engagement and attendance perspectives. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dinh, T. C., & Yen, P. H. (2024). MOOC learners’ perspectives of the effects of self-regulated learning strategy intervention on their self-regulation and speaking performance. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2378497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gökoğlu, S., Yılmaz, F. G. K., & Yılmaz, R. (2024). Student Engagement, Community of Inquiry, and Transactional Distance in Online Learning Environments: A Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(4), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7660 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Huang, H., & Qi, D. (2025). Is MOOC really effective? Exploring the outcomes of MOOC adoption and its influencing factors in a higher educational institution in China. PLoS ONE, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Huimin, Z., Ahmad, A. R., & Kadir, M. R. A. (2024). The Impact of MOOC Platform Quality on the Independent Learning Ability of Higher Education Students: A Critical Review of the Literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i6/21737 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Molina, O. E. (2024). Relationship engagement and academic dropout in MOOCs: A synthesis of an expo facto reserach. MLS Communication Journal, 2(1), 23–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Onah, D. F. O., Pang, E. L. L., & Sinclair, J. (2022). An investigation of self-regulated learning in a novel MOOC platform. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(1), 57–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09346-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pham, A. T. (2024). Blended MOOCs in higher education: Analyzing student interaction and satisfaction. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Shang, D., Chen, Q., Guo, X., H., J., Sun, K., & Li, M. (2024). Exploring the determinants on massive open online courses continuance learning intention in business toward accounting context. In arXiv (Cornell University). Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2411.16700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Xue, J., Xu, X., Wu, Y., & Hu, P. (2023). Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework and satisfaction: Examining the role of academic emotion and self-regulation in a structural model. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1046737 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Yunus, N. A. M., Ibrahim, N., Zakaria, I., Zainuddin, A. Z., Salleh, M. Z. M., & Rahim, N. N. A. (2024). Teaching customer service principles using the massive open online course (MOOCs) platform. International Journal on E-Learning and Higher Education, 19(2), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijelhe.v19n2.19226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Zhang, Y., Huang, J., Hussain, S., & Dong, Y. (2023). Investigating the Impact of the Community of Inquiry Presence on Online Learning Satisfaction: A Chinese College Student Perspective. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1883–1896. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s409229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles