Use of AhaSlides to Enhance Motivation, Satisfaction, and Cognitive Engagement Among ESL Students During Webinars

The proliferation of digital tools in language learning has heightened the need to evaluate platforms that foster learner engagement in virtual environments. This study examined the effectiveness of AhaSlides, an interactive presentation platform, in enhancing motivation, satisfaction, and cognitive engagement among English as a Second Language (ESL) students during online webinars. A concurrent mixed-methods design was employed: 48 university-level ESL students who participated in a series of AhaSlides-integrated webinars completed a validated Likert-scale questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha = .80) supplemented by one open-ended item. Descriptive statistics revealed high levels of learner response across all three constructs: motivation (M = 4.53, SD = 0.86), satisfaction (M = 4.49, SD = 0.88), and cognitive engagement (M = 4.47, SD = 0.89) on a 5-point Likert scale. Thematic analysis of the open-ended responses, following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework, generated four themes: interactive learning encouraging active participation, a comfortable space for expression, sustaining attention and learning focus, and accessibility facilitating participation. Taken together, the quantitative and qualitative findings indicate that AhaSlides meaningfully contributes to the affective and cognitive dimensions of ESL learning in synchronous virtual environments, chiefly by lowering participation barriers and sustaining attention through gamified, anonymous, and easily accessible interaction. The study offers implications for the pedagogical design of webinar-based ESL instruction and extends the limited empirical literature on AhaSlides as a tool for technology-enhanced language learning.

(AhaSlides; ESL students; motivation; satisfaction; cognitive engagement)

1. Achmad, D., Muslem, A., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Fitriani, S. S. (2026). Enhancing elementary EFL students' writing skills through interactive technology and task-based learning: A study with AhaSlides integration. International Journal of Language Studies, 20(1), 47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Achmad, D., Muslem, A., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Fitriani, S. S. (2025). Investigating the impact of Ahaslides on student engagement in the English classroom: A case study of young EFL learners. LinguAmerta, 2(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.32722/jla.v2i1.7832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Integrated constructive robotics in education (ICRE) model: A paradigmatic framework for transformative learning in educational ecosystem. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2324487. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2324487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Allehaidan, A. F. (2025). Levelling up learning: Exploring gamification impact on Saudi undergraduates' student engagement in higher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.1.2220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Maroof, R. S., Salloum, S. A., Hassanien, A. E., & Shaalan, K. (2021). Fear from COVID-19 and technology adoption: The impact of Google Meet during the pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1830121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Almusharraf, N. (2024). Assessing the integration of generative AI in higher education: An empirical study based on the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 1102–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12456-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Almutairi, A. M. (2024). A systematic review of catching and comparing the most valuable gamification elements used in online learning. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 2181–2201. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1591 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Arip, A. J., & Hashim, H. (2024). Gamification in English as Second Language (ESL) learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/24069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Arjomandi, A., Paloyo, A., & Suardi, S. (2022). Active learning and academic performance: The case of real-time interactive student polling. Statistics Education Research Journal, 22(1), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i1.122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1518602. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Daher, W., Anabousy, A., Amer, A., & Issa, N. (2026). Students' motivation for online learning of English as a second language through the lens of the self-determination theory. Higher Learning Research Communications, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v16i1.1615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Feira Fajar Kariena, Dewanti, R., Sulistyaningrum, S. D., Darmahusni, D., & Sumarni, S. (2022). The benefits and challenges of English teachers in implementing e-learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 22(1), 37–48. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/BS_JPBSP/article/view/47652/pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hamza, M. A. B. (2026). The impact of blended learning on EFL students' motivation to learn English: An exploration of students' perceptions. International Journal on Science and Technology, 17(1), 1044–1058. https://www.ijsat.org/research-paper.php?id=10444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hassan, I., Mohd Irtiyah, W., & Mahendran A/L Maniam. (2023). ESL undergraduates' engagement with web-based tools at a Malaysian public university. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences, 7, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23097.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hsu, L. (2024). EFL learners' acceptance and cognitive absorption in VR-based language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(4), 812–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Keller, J.M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. New York, NY: Springer [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kim, Y. (2020). The value of interactive polling and intrinsic motivation when using English as a medium of instruction. Sustainability, 12(4), Article 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Linling, Z., & Abdullah, R. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on flipped classroom for EFL courses: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221148149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mansoureh Saeidpoor Sarcheshmeh, Erdenebat, O., & Shanavas, S. A. (2024). The impact of COVID-19 on EFL/ESL education: A developing country experience in motivating teachers to return to in-person teaching. Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-382-5_17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mirzaeva, N. (2026). Impact of digital tools on language learning methodologies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 14(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i2.460 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. More, S. K., Patil, Y. M., & Kumbhar, P. D. (2025). Improving student performance through interactive webinars. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37, 339–342. https://journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/2360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Namaziandost, E., Heydarnejad, T., & Goodarzi, A. (2025). Unboxing the gifts of WhatsApp in language learning: Magnifying the impacts on English achievement, academic engagement, foreign language anxiety, and learner autonomy. Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00383-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nik Fauzi, S. F. B., Ambi, S. H., Abang Madaud, A. F., & Unin, N. (2022). Students' perceptions of online learning experiences for ESL speaking activities. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 8(1), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.4520.2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Noman, S., & Younus, M. (2025). Enhancing ESL learners' writing motivation through technology-enhanced collaborative instruction: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(2), 1858–1871. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.2.145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nur, D., & Zulheddi. (2025). Fostering Arabic speaking proficiency through Ahaslides-based instructional materials: A qualitative study in Indonesian secondary education. Alibbaa': Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 6(2), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.19105/ajpba.v6i2.20482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. OECD. (2026). Digital education outlook 2026: Exploring effective uses of generative AI in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/062a7394-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Romly, R., Ahmad, Jamil, N. J., & Sahib, F. H. (2024). Having an Aha! moment with AhaSlides: Increasing student involvement in ESL classes. BIOTIK: Scientific Journal of Biology Technology and Education. https://doi.org/10.22374/es.v1i1.26519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Roniel, S. F. (2025). Lowering the filter: The role of attitude in English language acquisition. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(3), 2274–2287. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.3.1020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sarah, & To, W.-M. (2025). Effects of online learning readiness and online self-regulated English learning on satisfaction with online English learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010093 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Simsek, E., & Karakus Yilmaz, T. (2025). A systematic review of the effects of gamification in online learning environments on learning outcomes. Open Praxis, 17(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Songyu, J., Hao, L., & Du, G. (2025). Technology acceptance model for online education: Identifying interdisciplinary topics and their evolution based on BERTopic model. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, Article 101831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Surani, D., Mudjiyanto, J., Hartono, R., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2025). Enhancing speaking skills and overcoming anxiety using technology: An e-learning module for EFL learners. Participatory Educational Research, 12(3), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.40.12.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study