Using Gamified Activity-Based Learning to Transform Classroom Dynamics from Pedagogy to Heutagogy

This research study, which is both conceptual and design-oriented, contends that the incorporation of gamified activity-based learning (GABL) rooted in heutagogical principles can transform classroom dynamics from a teacher-centered transmission model to a learner-centered capability development approach. This paper, grounded in heutagogy (self-determined learning), self-determination theory, and gamification literature, (1) delineates a theoretical framework that aligns heutagogical constructs (autonomy, capability, double-loop learning, reflection) with gamified activity design; (2) proposes a design-based research (DBR) intervention for language and classroom environments; and (3) details data collection and analysis strategies, expected outcomes, and practical implications. The method emphasizes learner autonomy, collaborative evaluation, continuous reflection, and contextual game components to promote enduring engagement, metacognition, and transferable skills. The implications for teacher education, curriculum development, and future empirical research are examined.

Heutagogy, gamification, activity-based learning, learner autonomy

1. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In A. Lugmayr, S. Franssila, & J. H. Nguyen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Lifelong Learning: Proceedings / practice-oriented publication. (Foundational work on heutagogy.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Domínguez, Adrián, et al. “Gamifying Learning Experiences.” Computers & Education, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dehghanzadeh, Hamed, et al. “Effects of Gamification on EFL Learners.” Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Haskell, E. “Quest-Based Learning.” 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Reading Engagement, Reading Anxiety, and Self-Perceived Reading Success among Malaysian ESL Foundation Students: A Descriptive Study
• Teachers’ Perceptions of AI-Assisted Digital Storytelling in Malaysian Lower Secondary ESL Classrooms
• A Speech Act Analysis of Governor Nyesom Wike’s 2015 Inaugural Address
• English Teaching Methods and Pupils’ Performance in Nangako Town Council, Uganda
• English Teachers’ Experiences of Implementing Communicative Language Teaching in Pioneering Senior High School Alternative Learning System Contexts: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis