Validating a Multi-Dimensional Green Consumer Behavior Instrument in Post-COVID Nepal
Authors
Campus Chief Faculty of Management Hile Campus Dhankuta, Tribhuvan University (Nepal)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000140
Subject Category: Marketing
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 1647-1659
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-25
Accepted: 2025-09-30
Published: 2025-11-06
Abstract
This study provides a comprehensive psychometric validation of a multidimensional questionnaire designed to measure green consumer behavior in the post-COVID-19 context. The instrument, administered in Dhankuta Municipality, Nepal. This study uniquely integrates pandemic-induced behavioral influences with classical economic, psychological, and environmental theories, creating a six-dimensional framework. This multidimensional model not only predicts green purchasing behavior but also advances existing literature by formalizing the pandemic’s role in shaping sustainable consumption. Content validity was supported through expert review, and construct validity was examined via Pearson correlations and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). All items correlated significantly with their respective subscales (r = .415–.891, p < .001), exceeding the critical threshold (±.1265, df = 391, p < .05). Reliability analyses demonstrated strong internal consistency across dimensions (Cronbach’s α = .70–.88). Multi-group CFA confirmed measurement invariance across gender (ΔCFI < .01), ensuring the scale functions equivalently for males and females. Structural equation modeling further validated criterion-related evidence, showing that pandemic-related (β = 0.306, p < 0.001), economic (β = 0.235, p < 0.001), and environmental (β = 0.157, p < 0.001) factors significantly predicted willingness to pay (WTP) for green products. Psychological influence was marginal (β = .106, p = .018), while social and sustainability dimensions were no significant. The model accounted for 40% of the variance in WTP (R² = .401). Collectively, the findings confirm the instrument’s reliability, factorial validity, and predictive utility. Beyond established sustainability measures, this questionnaire uniquely integrates pandemic-related behavioral influences, offering new insights into shifting consumer patterns. The validated scale provides a robust tool for research and practice, enabling cross-group comparisons and longitudinal tracking of sustainable consumer behavior in the post-pandemic era.
Keywords
green consumer behavior, psychometric validation, post-COVID-19, measurement invariance
Downloads
References
1. Avinç, E., & Doğan, F. (2025). Modeling, development and validation of environmental behavior scale for preservice teachers. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 17659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01277-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Breczku, A. M. (2022). Eco-conscious and green consumption of FMCG hair care products in Pest County, Hungary. Prosperitas, 9(1–2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31570/prosp_2022_0013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (Second edition). The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chen, B., Xie, Y., Yang, T., & Zhou, Q. (2025). Hua-Chen new theory of economic optimization. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 18(10), 2828–2852. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2025083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ciski, M., & Rząsa, K. (2025). The Environmental Dimension of Sustainable Development in Relation to the Transition from Brown to Green Energy—A Case Study of Poland from 2005 to 2023. Energies, 18(11), 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gaskin, J. E., Lowry, P. B., Rosengren, W., & Fife, P. T. (2025). Essential Validation Criteria for Rigorous Covariance‐Based Structural Equation Modelling. Information Systems Journal, isj.12598. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hasna, A. M. (2012). DIMENSIONS OF SUSTAINABILITY. Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Community Development, 1(2), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.3992/2166-2517-1.2.47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1–2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY1. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Liu, Y., Shen, X., & Mi, H. (2022). Psychological Dimensions and Their Inner Relationships of College Students’ Network Civilization. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 12(12), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12120483 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Phuyal, P. (2024). Impact of Covid-19 in Changing Lifestyle Notions of Green Consumers: A Case Study of Dhankuta Municipality. Dristikon: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.3126/dristikon.v14i1.66052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Puerta Quispe, Á. A. E., Pérez Alarcón, K. Y., & Conde Rodríguez, I. A. (2025). Development and validation of the cleanliness satisfaction scale (ESL-AK) in a sample of adults from the Province of San Román, Perú. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 672. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03010-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Qiao, S., Li, Z., Liang, C., Li, X., & Rudisill, C. (2023). Three dimensions of COVID-19 risk perceptions and their socioeconomic correlates in the United States: A social media analysis. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 43(6), 1174–1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Shatnawi, Y., Ai Chin, T., Salisu, B., & Babatunde Bello, K. (2023). Psychometric Properties of the Antecedents of Green Purchasing Behaviour: A Pilot Reliability and Validity Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(9), Pages 890-903. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i9/17876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Wong, P. Y., Wo, S. W., & Wu, S. L. (2025). Validation of the Pro-Environmental Behaviour (PEB) Scale in Malaysia: Assessing cross-age and gender invariance. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01407-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]