Validity and Reliability of Lecturers' Behaviors Questionnaire and Student Instructor-Relationship Scale (SIRS) Instruments: Study of Physical Education Students in College

The purpose of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Lecturers' Behaviors Questionnaire and Student Instructor-Relationship Scale (SIRS) instruments. This study used a quantitative approach. Respondents in this study were students of the Physical Education, Health, and Recreation study program, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Surabaya State University. The researcher used the Slovin formula in determining the number of respondents. Data were collected using an online Likert-scale questionnaire. The researcher conducted validity and reliability tests using SPSS. The results showed that 22 of the 24 total statements in the Lecturers' Behaviors Questionnaire were deemed valid (Sig.). (2-tailed) <0.05. The reliability of the Lecturers' Behaviors Questionnaire was .916. In the Student Instructor-Relationship Scale (SIRS), Researcher 34 of the total 36 statements in the Lecturers' Behaviors Questionnaire were valid (Sig.). (2-tailed) <0.05. The reliability of SIRS is .852. Based on the research results, the Lecturers' Behaviors Questionnaire is suitable for measuring students' perceptions of lecturers' behavior during the learning process. SIRS is suitable for assessing the quality of the relationship between students and lecturers in the learning process for students of the Physical Education, Health and Recreation study program in higher education.

The primary duties of lecturers in Indonesia are synonymous

1. Ali, M. (2020). Hubungan Peran Dosen dengan Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Kesehatan, 6(2), 693–699. https://doi.org/10.38165/jk.v6i2.149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alshahrani, S., Ahmed, E., & Ward, R. (2017). The influence of online resources on student–lecturer relationship in higher education: a comparison study. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0083-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bone, H., & Minggu, D. (2022). Eksplorasi Motivasi, Orang Tua Dan Thinking Style Terhadap Performa Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi. … EKONOMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu …, 16, 279–287. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpe.v16i2.33777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. García-Machado, J. J., Martínez Ávila, M., Dospinescu, N., & Dospinescu, O. (2024). How the support that students receive during online learning influences their academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 20005–20029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12639-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kamraju, M., Krishnaiah, J., Durgesham, G., Shaba, N., Begum, S. A., Fatima, N., & Madhuri, Y. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Online Education on Higher Education. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(1), 27–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kuong, H. C. (2015). Enhancing Online Learning Experience: From Learners’ Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1002–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Markus Masan Bali. (2018). Peran Dosen Dalam Mengembangkan Karakter Mahasiswa. Humaniora, 4(2), 800–810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Noori, A. Q., Orfan, S. N., & Nawi, A. M. (2021). Students’ Perception of Lecturers’ Behaviors in the Learning Environment. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.3p.64 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Noori, A. Q., Said, H., Nor, F. M., & Ghani, F. A. (2020). The relationship between university lecturers’ behaviour and students’ motivation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pranatasari, F. D. (2017). Pengaruh Mentoring Dosen Pembimbing Akademik Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa. Business Management Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30813/bmj.v12i2.432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sundani, N. D., & Mamokhere, J. (2021). The Impact Of Student-Lecturer Relationship On Good Decision- Making And Quality Promotion In The Institutions Of Higher Education And Training. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching & Learning, 5(2), 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: a conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9907-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Voelkel, S., Bates, A., Gleave, T., Larsen, C., Stollar, E. J., Wattret, G., & Mello, L. V. (2023). Lecture capture affects student learning behaviour. FEBS Open Bio, 13(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Werang, B. R., & Leba, S. M. R. (2022). Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. Qualitative Report, 27(2), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study