Validity and Reliability of the A Safety Management Questionnaire Instrument in Schools
Authors
Institute Of Teacher Education, Gaya Campus (Malaysia)
Institute Of Teacher Education, Gaya Campus (Malaysia)
Uthaya Chanthira Kumar Muniandy
Institute Of Teacher Education, Gaya Campus (Malaysia)
Institute Of Teacher Education, Gaya Campus (Malaysia)
Institute Of Teacher Education, Gaya Campus (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600049
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 659-667
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-22
Accepted: 2026-05-28
Published: 2026-06-17
Abstract
This study was conducted to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of a questionnaire instrument on the safety management of co-curricular activities in schools. The study adopted a quantitative approach employing a survey research design. The instrument development process was carried out based on the instrument construction procedures proposed by Morrow et al. (1995). The questionnaire instrument was developed based on three principal constructs, namely environmental factors, equipment factors, and student factors. A pilot study was conducted in the Kota Belud district, Sabah, involving eight daily secondary schools, with a total of 150 teachers selected through simple random sampling techniques. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. To determine construct validity, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method was conducted. The results of the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test indicated a value of r=.826, while Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity demonstrated a significant value of p=.001. The Total Variance Explained analysis revealed that three principal constructs were successfully established, accounting for a cumulative variance of 79.285%. The questionnaire instrument consisted of 35 items comprising 13 environmental factor items, 11 equipment factor items, and 11 student factor items. The Rotated Component Matrix analysis showed that all items achieved factor loadings exceeding .50 and were therefore retained in the final instrument. Furthermore, the language validity value obtained was r=.91, while the content validity value was r=.92. The reliability findings revealed that the Cronbach’s Alpha values for environmental factors, equipment factors, and student factors were r=.97, r=.96, and r=.97 respectively, with an overall instrument reliability value of r=.98. Overall, the findings indicate that the developed questionnaire instrument possesses a very high level of validity and reliability and is suitable for measuring the safety management of co-curricular activities in schools.
Keywords
validity, reliability, questionnaire instrument, safety management, co-curricular activities
Downloads
References
1. Firenze, R. J. (1978). The process of hazard control. Kendall/Hunt. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Flanz, J., Jäkel, O., Ford, E., Hahn, S., Mazal, A., & Daartz, J. (2016). PTCOG safety group report on aspects of safety in particle therapy (Version 2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Garis panduan keselamatan dan kesihatan pekerjaan bagi aktiviti kokurikulum di sekolah. (2018). Jabatan Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan Malaysia, Kementerian Sumber Manusia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Heinrich, H. W. (1941). Industrial accident prevention: A scientific approach (2nd ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jaffry Zakaria, Mohd Harun, & Norlena Salamuddin. (2018). Amalan pengurusan risiko sukan dan rekreasi. Simplandin Resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kalaiselvan, P., & Daud, M. A. K. M. (2021). Pengurusan risiko dalam pelaksanaan kokurikulum murid sekolah rendah daerah Sepang. JUPIDI: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 8(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2000). Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bil. 9/2000: Panduan keselamatan diri pelajar semasa pengajaran pendidikan jasmani dan kesihatan serta kegiatan kokurikulum dan sukan di dalam dan di luar kawasan sekolah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2002a). Konsep dan manual sekolah selamat: Panduan pelaksanaan menjadikan sekolah, komuniti dan keluarga selamat untuk kanak-kanak. Bahagian Sekolah, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2002b). Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bilangan 4/2002: Pelaksanaan Program Sekolah Selamat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bilangan 5/2016. https://www.moe.gov.my/images/pekeliling/2016/circularfile_file_001402.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Marinah Awang, & Norhazwani Suyanto. (2017). Pendekatan keselamatan dan kesejahteraan pelajar untuk sekolah-sekolah di Malaysia. Management Research Journal, 7, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Morrow, J. R., Jackson, A. W., Disch, J. G., & Mood, D. P. (1995). Measurement and evaluation in human performance (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Raj, S. A., & Jaffry Zakaria, A. H. (2022). Needs analysis of risk management in extra cocurriculum activities in school. Journal of Advanced Sport and Physical Education, 5(7), 154–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. BMJ, 320(7237), 768–770. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Santhanadass, A. R. (2015). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen penilaian pendidikan luar (Master’s dissertation, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Zakaria, J. (2016). Amalan pengurusan risiko terhadap pengurusan kemudahan kompleks jabatan belia dan sukan negeri dan kompleks rakan muda di Malaysia: Satu perbandingan (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study