Valorisation of Jackfruit Seed By-Products in Flatbread Development: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Chapati Quality and Consumer Preference
Authors
Department of Nutrition Sciences, Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan (Malaysia)
Nur Ariena Balqis Mohamad Sahayuti
Department of Nutrition Sciences, Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200118
Subject Category: Marketing
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 1566-1578
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-11
Accepted: 2026-02-17
Published: 2026-02-26
Abstract
Background: The valorisation of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) seed by-products offers a sustainable approach to enhance the nutritional quality of cereal-based staples while reducing food system waste. Jackfruit seed flour (JSF), rich in carbohydrates, minerals and dietary fibre, presents potential as a functional ingredient in composite flour systems, yet its application in chapati remains underexplored.
Methods: JSF was produced through controlled boiling, drying and milling before being incorporated into chapati formulations at 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% substitution levels. Physical properties (diameter, thickness, puffing score, firmness, colour), dough-handling behaviour and sensory attributes were evaluated using established analytical procedures. Sensory testing involved 30 untrained panelists using a 9-point hedonic scale. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test.
Results: Increasing JSF incorporation significantly affected chapati structure and appearance. Higher substitution levels reduced diameter and puffing, increased firmness and darkened surface colour (lower L* values). Sensory evaluation indicated that 10% JSF achieved the highest acceptability, balancing nutritional enhancement with desirable appearance, aroma, texture and taste. Acceptance declined at 20% and 30% substitution due to increased firmness, reduced puffing and the presence of stronger seed-derived flavours.
Conclusion: Jackfruit seed flour can be successfully incorporated into chapati at low substitution levels. A 10% substitution provides optimal nutritional improvement without compromising sensory quality, while higher levels negatively impact dough behaviour and acceptability. These findings support the utilisation of JSF as a functional ingredient in nutrient-enriched flatbread development and highlight its potential for valorising tropical fruit seed by-products.
Keywords
Jackfruit seed flour; valorisation; chapati; composite flour; sensory evaluation.
Downloads
References
1. Ahmed, M., Zaid, A., & Rahman, S. (2023). Enhancing dough rheology through enzymatic hydrolysis and hydrocolloid incorporation in composite flours. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 47(5), e17022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.17022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Augustin, M. A., Riley, M., Stockmann, R., Bennett, L., Kahl, A., Lockett, T., Osmond, M., Sanguansri, P., Stonehouse, W., & Cobiac, L. (2015). Role of food processing in food and nutrition security. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 47(2), 115–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bharath, K. N., Murthy, T. N., & Nagaraj, H. (2023). Influence of fruit seed flours on sensory and textural quality of traditional flatbreads. Food Bioscience, 52, 102375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Borah, R., Baruah, R., & Kalita, D. (2022). Effects of chia and quinoa incorporation on moisture retention and texture of maize tortillas. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 168, 113890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113890 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Costa, A., Dinnella, C., Miele, N., & Monteleone, E. (2023). Advances in sensory evaluation methods for functional and health-oriented foods. Food Quality and Preference, 109, 104902. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104902 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Costa, E., Rodrigues, L., & Barros, A. (2023). Valorisation of tropical fruit by-products for sustainable flour production: A circular bioeconomy approach. Sustainable Food Technologies, 4(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susft.2023.145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ferrari, G., Donati, L., & Leone, C. (2022). Hydrocolloid-assisted improvement of composite dough properties in gluten-reduced bakery systems. Food Hydrocolloids, 131, 107799. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ferrari, L., Bonomi, F., Iametti, S., & Pagani, M. A. (2022). Development of low-glycaemic index bread using alternative cereal and tuber flours. Food Research International, 157, 111304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ghosh, A., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2021). Effect of fibre-rich composite flours on bread quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 98, 103150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Khan, M. A., Patel, R., & Singh, D. (2023). Consumer acceptability of composite-flour breads enriched with fruit and fibre sources. Journal of Food Quality, 46(2), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Khan, R., Swami, S., & Patel, N. (2023). Rheological behaviour of fibre-enriched sorghum–wheat composite doughs and their impact on flatbread quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 109, 103496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2023.103496 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kumar, R., Das, A., & Thomas, P. (2023). Emerging tropical fruit flours in functional food applications: A review. Current Nutrition & Food Science, 19(2), 123–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573401318666210811154121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kumar, S., Devi, R., & Ramesh, B. (2023). Nutritional and functional properties of jackfruit seed flour: Implications for food fortification. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 117, 105123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Melini, F., & Melini, V. (2021). Strategies to enhance nutritional and technological quality of cereal-based foods through composite flour systems. Foods, 10(8), 1850. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Melini, V., & Melini, F. (2021). Strategies for developing gluten-free bakery products: Recent advances and future perspectives. Foods, 10(10), 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Nunes, C. A., Oliveira, M., & Santos, J. P. (2024). Volatile compound profiles in fruit-based flours and their impact on baked product acceptability. Food Chemistry, 430, 137223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Nunes, R. F., Silva, L. P., & Teixeira, D. (2024). Maillard browning and sensory changes in fruit-enriched flatbreads: A comparative study. Food Chemistry Advances, 7, 100239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2024.100239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Reddy, N., Venkatesh, K., & Rao, D. (2022). Nutritional composition and functional properties of unripe jackfruit flour for food applications. Food Chemistry, 373, 131464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Reddy, V., Chandra, P., & Rao, K. (2022). Functional potential of tropical fruit seed flours in composite bakery applications. Food Research International, 156, 111300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Santos, J. P., Oliveira, M., & Nunes, C. A. (2023). Sensory thresholds of fruit-enriched flatbreads and their impact on consumer liking. Journal of Cereal Science, 110, 103651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Sciarini, L. S., Borneo, R., & León, A. E. (2024). Impact of composite flours on dough rheology and gluten-replacement strategies in breadmaking. Food Hydrocolloids, 143, 109246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Sciarini, L. S., Pérez, G. T., & Basanta, M. F. (2024). Gluten dilution and fibre interactions in composite dough matrices: Implications for flatbread quality. Journal of Food Engineering, 350, 111020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2023.111020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Shelar, R., Jadhav, V., & Tambe, S. (2023). Nutritional characterisation of jackfruit seed and its potential application in functional foods. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 170, 114099. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Shelar, A., Khedkar, R., & Manohar, R. S. (2023). Utilisation of underused tropical fruits in bakery products: Technological and nutritional perspectives. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 47(2), e17242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Shilpa, M., & Lakshmi, A. J. (2021). Effect of high-fibre composite flours on sensory and textural attributes of traditional flatbreads. Journal of Food Quality, 2021, 8839172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8839172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Velásquez, B., Morales, R., & Cárdenas, C. (2024). Impact of high-fibre flour substitution on sensory attributes and overall liking in bread products. Food Chemistry, 431, 137312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Velásquez, J. P., Muñoz, C., & Álvarez, M. (2024). Structural and browning changes in fruit-fortified flatbreads during high-temperature cooking. Food Structure, 35, 100364. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foostr.2024.100364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Yadav, M., Singh, D., & Duhan, S. (2023). Moisture migration and textural behaviour in psyllium- and fibre-enriched dough systems. Journal of Texture Studies, 54(4), 700–712. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Wang, H. (2019). Effect of gluten dilution and fibre enrichment on bread texture and structure. Food Hydrocolloids, 87, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]