Visionary Leadership among School Heads in a Province in the Philippines: A Convergent Parallel Mixed Methods Research

This study examined the visionary leadership of school heads in a province in the Philippines using a convergent parallel mixed methods research design. The study aimed to determine the level of visionary leadership of school heads in general and when grouped according to sex, age, highest educational attainment, years of service, and plantilla position, determine whether significant differences exist in visionary leadership across profile variables, and explore how school heads demonstrate visionary leadership in managing and governing their schools. Quantitative data were gathered from 173 school heads in public elementary, secondary, and integrated schools through a researcher-adapted Visionary Leadership Scale, while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected school heads. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including mean, standard deviation, Mann–Whitney U test, and Kruskal–Wallis H test, were used for quantitative analysis, while thematic analysis was utilized for qualitative data. Findings revealed that school heads demonstrated a very high level of visionary leadership overall. Significant differences were found when grouped according to sex, age, years in service, and plantilla position, while no significant difference was observed in terms of educational attainment. Qualitative findings showed that school heads demonstrated visionary leadership through clear articulation of school vision, strategic alignment of programs, stakeholder motivation, participatory governance, and proactive management practices. The study concluded that visionary leadership is a critical dimension of effective school governance and organizational improvement.

Visionary leadership, school heads, school governance, educational leadership, mixed methods research, Philippines

1. Agustin, R., Hadiyati, N., & Nasir, M. (2024). Visionary leadership and school improvement practices among principals. Educational Leadership Review, 18(2), 44–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akpan, C. P. (2021). Innovative school leadership and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(3), 299–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2007). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. Leadership by James MacGregor Burns [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Candrasari, N., et al. (2023). Visionary leadership and collaborative school governance. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 12(1), 88–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Center for Creative Leadership. (2023). Leadership competencies for organizational effectiveness. Center for Creative Leadership [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. SAGE Research Design [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Darling-Hammond, L., et al. (2022). Effective principal leadership and school improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(4), 567–601. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020: Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads. Department of Education. DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education. (2023). School-Based Management implementation guidelines. Department of Education. Department of Education Philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dhawan, S. (2023). Leadership and holistic education development. International Journal of Educational Reform, 32(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Digital Promise. (2024). Visionary leadership in educational organizations.Digital Promise [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Eagly, A. H., & Heilman, M. E. (2022). Gender and leadership effectiveness. American Psychologist, 77(3), 321–333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. EDCOM 2. (2024). Miseducation: The failed system of Philippine education. Second Congressional Commission on Education. EDCOM 2 Year One Report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. EDCOM 2. (2025). Fixing the foundations: A matter of national survival. Second Congressional Commission on Education. EDCOM 2 Year Two Report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (3rd ed.). Routledge. Routledge Book Page [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Leading in a Culture of Change [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gallos, J. V., & Bolman, L. G. (2021). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (7th ed.). Wiley. Reframing Organizations [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Guillergan, R. (2024). Leadership styles among Philippine school heads. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership, 9(1), 18–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hoang, T., et al. (2022). Leadership competencies and contextual leadership effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 33(4), 101620. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Komariyah, A. (2020). Visionary leadership and educational transformation. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09365-8. Journal of Educational Change [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lingatong, R. (2024). Visionary leadership and school-based management implementation in Philippine public schools. Philippine Educational Management Journal, 14(1), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. OECD. (2020). Education governance perspectives: Effective leadership and school improvement. OECD Publishing. OECD Education Governance [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. OECD. (2021). School-based management and stakeholder engagement survey. OECD Publishing. OECD Education Surveys [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. OECD. (2023). Educational leadership and governance in changing times. OECD Publishing. OECD Education Leadership Reports [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rosadi, M., et al. (2024). Visionary leadership and school innovation practices. Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 16(2), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rohmah, S. (2021). Multifaceted roles of school heads in educational leadership. Educational Management Quarterly, 27(4), 91–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Somech, A. (2005). Directive versus participative leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing school effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(5), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04274248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Spillane, J. P. (2021). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. Distributed Leadership Overview [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. UNESCO Education Report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. UNESCO. (2023). Transformative school leadership and sustainable educational development. UNESCO Publishing. UNESCO Official Website [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wharton-Beck, M. (2022). Educational leadership during and after the pandemic. International Review of Education, 68(5), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09964-4. International Review of Education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Yorman, R. (2023). Visionary leadership in education management: Leading toward optimal achievement in the era of independent learning. Educational Management Journal, 14(3), 101–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2019). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(4), 66–85. Academy of Management Perspectives [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study