Vulnerability and Optimization of Family Planning Financing in Togo, 2026-2030: A National Budget Analysis
Authors
Ministry of Health, Public Hygiene and Universal Access to Health Care, Lomé (Togo)
Ministry of Health, Public Hygiene and Universal Access to Health Care, Lomé, (Togo)
Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory in Social and Health Sciences, Joseph Ki-Zerbo University, Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800620
Subject Category: Banking and Finance
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 9295-9311
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-24
Accepted: 2026-09-02
Published: 2026-09-14
Abstract
Background: Togo is approaching the end of its 2023-2026 Costed Implementation Plan for Family Planning amid less predictable external financing. Decision-makers need to identify both the aggregate gap and the programme functions most exposed to disruption.
Objective: To quantify the 2026-2030 financing gap, assess external-financing vulnerability, examine alignment with evidence-informed high-impact practices, and model internal resource optimization.
Methods: We conducted a national documentary and budget analysis using the costed plan, FP2030 indicators, expenditure data, partner commitments, commodity forecasts, and OECD data. The six-pillar programmatic envelope was kept separate from contraceptive commodity requirements. A composite index combined normalized external-financing volume, dependence, and donor concentration; alternative weights tested rank sensitivity. Equity was assessed by residence, age, and region. Deterministic stress tests examined financing assumptions and partial realization of optimization opportunities.
Results: The programmatic requirement was FCFA 9.99 billion, with FCFA 3.23 billion (32.4%; USD 5.38 million at FCFA 600/USD) unfunded; this excluded the separate USD 31.58 million commodity requirement, of which 17.4% was financed. Service delivery and demand generation represented 70.7% of the programmatic gap. The same four pillars occupied the highest-risk positions under all weighting schemes. Rural mCPR was 9.7 percentage points below the urban level, and the regional range was 11.0 points. The full optimization ceiling was 59.9%, whereas 25-75% realization covered 15.0-44.9%. At 80% realization of partner commitments, the gap rose to 40.3% of need.
Conclusion: Togo faces both a resource deficit and an allocation problem. The 59.9% estimate is a modelling ceiling, not a bankable saving. Action requires protected commodity financing, explicit budgets for integrated services, equity-sensitive allocation, verification of efficiencies, and tracking from commitments to implementation.
Keywords
family planning; contraception; health financing; resource mobilisation; donor transition; high-impact practices; vulnerability index; sensitivity analysis; Togo.
Downloads
References
1. World Health Organization. Family planning/contraception methods [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2025 [cited 2026 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahmed S, Li Q, Liu L, Tsui AO. Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: an analysis of 172 countries. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):111-125. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60478-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):149-156. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60609-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Sully EA, Biddlecom A, Darroch JE, Riley T, Ashford LS, Lince-Deroche N, et al. Adding It Up: Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health 2019. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Family Planning 2022: Meeting the changing needs for family planning. New York: United Nations; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ministry of Health, Public Hygiene and Universal Access to Care. Togo Costed Implementation Plan for Family Planning 2023-2026. Lomé: Government of Togo; 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. FP2030. Togo 2022 FP Indicator Summary and Fact Sheet [Internet]. Washington (DC): FP2030; 2023 [cited 2026 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.fp2030.org/resources/togo-2022-fp-indicator-summary-and-fact-sheet/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. World Health Organization, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs. Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers. 4th ed. Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. High Impact Practices in Family Planning. Immediate postpartum family planning: a key component of childbirth care [Internet]. Washington (DC): HIP Partnership; 2022 [cited 2026 Jul 16]. Available from: https://fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/immediate-postpartum-family-planning/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. High Impact Practices in Family Planning. Integrating family planning and immunization services [Internet]. Washington (DC): HIP Partnership; 2021 [cited 2026 Jul 16]. Available from: https://fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/family-planning-and-immunization-integration/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. High Impact Practices in Family Planning. Adolescent-responsive contraceptive services [Internet]. Washington (DC): HIP Partnership; 2021 [cited 2026 Jul 16]. Available from: https://fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/adolescent-responsive-contraceptive-services/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. High Impact Practices in Family Planning. Task sharing in family planning service delivery [Internet]. Washington (DC): HIP Partnership; 2025 [cited 2026 Jul 16]. Available from: https://fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/task-sharing/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Huntington D, Aplogan A. The integration of family planning and childhood immunization services in Togo. Stud Fam Plann. 1994;25(3):176-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Jha A, Kolesar RJ, Comas S, Gribble J, Ugaz J, Gonzalez-Pier E. Getting ready for reduced donor dependency: the co-financing of family planning commodities. Health Policy Plan. 2024;39(1):87-93. doi:10.1093/heapol/czad106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Igharo V, Ananaba U, Omotoso O, Davis T, Kioko M, Finkle C. Innovations in public financing for family planning at subnational levels: sustainable cofinancing strategies with Nigerian states. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024;12(Suppl 2):e2200242. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mao W, McDade KK, Huffstetler HE, Dodoo J, Abankwah DNY, Coleman N, et al. Transitioning from donor aid for health: perspectives of national stakeholders in Ghana. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(1):e003896. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003896. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Huffstetler HE, Bandara S, Bharali I, McDade KK, Mao W, Guo F, et al. The impacts of donor transitions on health systems in middle-income countries: a scoping review. Health Policy Plan. 2022;37(9):1188-1202. doi:10.1093/heapol/czac063. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Rodríguez DC, Whiteside A, Bennett S. Political commitment for vulnerable populations during donor transition. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(2):121-127. doi:10.2471/BLT.16.179861. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Federspiel F, Borghi J, Mbaye EM, Jensen HT, Martinez-Alvarez M. Development partner influence on domestic health financing contributions in Senegal: a mixed-methods case study. Health Policy Plan. 2025;40(3):300-317. doi:10.1093/heapol/czae110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. World Health Organization, World Bank. Tracking universal health coverage: 2025 global monitoring report. Geneva: WHO and World Bank; 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Creditor Reporting System [database]. Paris: OECD; 2026 [cited 2026 Jul 16]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. High Impact Practices in Family Planning. High Impact Practice Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): HIP Partnership; 2025 [cited 2026 Sep 3]. Available from: https://fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sullivan SD, Mauskopf JA, Augustovski F, Caro JJ, Lee KM, Minchin M, et al. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. Value Health. 2014;17(1):5-14. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Study on Customer Awareness on Green Banking Intiatives
- International Financial Reporting Standards and Earnings Management: A Global Research Landscape Analysis
- Analysis of Financial Performance and Operational Efficiency of State Bank of India Using the CAMEL Framework
- Roles and Performance of India Post Payment Bank (IPPB) With Special References to Shivamogga District
- Enhancing Transactional Security in U.S. Banking Systems by Implementing OTP-Based Two-Factor Authentication to Mitigate Debit and Credit Card Fraud