When a Statistical Sequence Is Not a Developmental Sequence: A Theory-First Workflow for PROCESS Model 6 in Educational Research

Authors

Amiree bin Aripin

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Shahlan bin Surat

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Faridah binti Mydin Kutty

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800678

Subject Category: Education Psychology

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 10062-10073

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-13

Accepted: 2026-08-18

Published: 2026-09-15

Abstract

Serial mediation is frequently selected from a statistical template before the ordering of mediators has been adequately justified. This methodological article develops a theory-first workflow for applying Hayes PROCESS Macro Model 6 in educational research and demonstrates the workflow using data from 400 novice public secondary-school teachers in five districts of Selangor, Malaysia. The novice-teacher dataset is used as a worked methodological illustration rather than as the article's primary substantive contribution. Mentoring was specified as the predictor (X), psychological capital as the first mediator (M1), work engagement as the second mediator (M2), and professional identity as the outcome (Y). The analysis used 5,000 bootstrap resamples and 95% confidence intervals. Mentoring was positively associated with psychological capital and work engagement, while psychological capital and work engagement were each positively associated with professional identity conditional on the other variables in the corresponding regression equations. All three specific indirect effects excluded zero: through psychological capital (0.17, 95% CI [0.14, 0.21]), through work engagement (0.13, 95% CI [0.10, 0.17]), and serially through psychological capital and work engagement (0.03, 95% CI [0.02, 0.05]). The remaining direct association between mentoring and professional identity was not statistically significant after accounting for the mediators. The example shows how Model 6 decomposes an overall association into substantively distinct routes, while demonstrating that a statistical sequence does not establish developmental succession. Bootstrap inference quantifies uncertainty in indirect-effect products; it does not establish temporal precedence, eliminate omitted-variable bias, validate measurement, or identify causal mediation effects. Researchers should therefore justify mediator order before estimation, report every constituent path and specific indirect effect, examine credible rival sequences, and reserve causal language for designs that support causal identification and temporal ordering.

Keywords

PROCESS Macro, serial mediation, novice teachers, psychological capital

Downloads

References

1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Georgeson, A. R., Alvarez-Bartolo, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2025). A sensitivity analysis for temporal bias in cross-sectional mediation. Psychological Methods, 30(6), 1326-1344. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000628 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Guo, Q., Wang, Y., Liu, Q., Wang, T., Zhang, L., Huang, Z., & Cao, S. (2022). Psychological capital and occupational well-being: Mediating effects of work engagement among Chinese special education teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 847882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847882 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2020). Conditional process analysis: Concepts, computation, and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(1), 19-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219859633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Li, B., Li, Z., & Fu, M. (2022). Understanding beginning teachers' professional identity changes through job demands-resources theory. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ma, Y. (2023). Boosting teacher work engagement: The mediating role of psychological capital through emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1240943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3901_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nickel, J., & Crosby, S. (2022). Professional identity values and tensions for early career teachers. Teaching Education, 33(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2021.1895107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Prabjandee, D. (2022). Inconvenient truth? How different mentoring approaches impact student-teacher identity development. Frontiers in Education, 7, 916749. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.916749 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Schuler, M. S., Coffman, D. L., Stuart, E. A., Nguyen, T. Q., Vegetabile, B., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2025). Practical challenges in mediation analysis: A guide for applied researchers. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 25(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-024-00327-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Vaitzman Ben-David, H., & Berkovich, I. (2021). Associations between novice teachers' perceptions of their relationship to their mentor and professional commitment. Teachers and Teaching, 27(1-4), 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1946035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Weiß, J. K., Bottling, M., & Kärner, T. (2023). Professional identification in the beginning of a teacher's career: A longitudinal study on identity formation and the basic psychological need for autonomy in VET teacher training. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1196473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196473 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the Job Demands-Resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Xu, J. (2023). The interplay between Chinese EFL teachers' positive psychological capital and their work engagement. Heliyon, 9(2), e13151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309-334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. VanderWeele, T. J. (2016). Mediation analysis: A practitioner's guide. Annual Review of Public Health, 37, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Karaolis, A., & Philippou, G. N. (2019). Teachers' professional identity. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education (pp. 397-417). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13761-8_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hanna, F., Oostdam, R., Severiens, S. E., & Zijlstra, B. J. H. (2020). Assessing the professional identity of primary student teachers: Design and validation of the Teacher Identity Measurement Scale. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES): Test manual. Utrecht University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Chang, W., & Busser, J. A. (2017). Hospitality employees' promotional attitude: Findings from graduates of a twelve-month management training program. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.09.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles