When Violence Becomes Entertainment: Soviet Georgian Caricature

Authors

Tinatin Janjgava

Shota Rustaveli Theatre and Film Georgia State University Art Sciences, Media and Management Faculty Doctoral Program – Art Studies (Art History) Tbilisi, Georgia (Georgia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400304

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 4168-4175

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-09

Accepted: 2026-04-16

Published: 2026-05-07

Abstract

This article examines Soviet Georgian political caricature with a focus on the normalization and aestheticization of violence. The study argues that caricature functioned as a mechanism for transforming violence into spectacle and entertainment, contributing to the erosion of empathy. Using art-historical and semiotic analysis, the research explores satirical journals such as Niangi and Tartarozi. It demonstrates that visual strategies including grotesque exaggeration, symbolic contrast, and dehumanization were used to legitimize aggression and shape ideological perception.
The article concludes that caricature played a central role in constructing emotional responses aligned with Soviet propaganda. The case of Georgia is particularly insightful. Situated between Eastern Europe and Western Asia, the country developed an active satirical press during the late imperial and early Soviet periods. By the beginning of the twentieth century, caricature had become an important tool for discussing social inequality, local political issues, cultural tensions, and international relations. However, after Georgia was incorporated into the Soviet system, the role of satire changed. The new political regime did not remove humorous imagery but reshaped its purpose. Satire turned into a medium for spreading official ideology in a form that was understandable to the local population.

Keywords

Political caricature; Soviet propaganda; violence; Georgian satire; ideology.

Downloads

References

1. Vachnadze, M., & Guruli, V. History of Georgia (19th–20th Centuries). Tbilisi: Intelecti. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Tartarozi Magazine. 01.01.1025 Tbilisi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Tartarozi Magazine. 28.02.1926, No. 38. Tbilisi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kipnisi, M. (1967). The Pioneers of Georgian Caricature. Literaturuli Sakartvelo [Literary Georgia], 16 June. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mishveladze, R. (2013). Selected Works, Vol. 24. Tbilisi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Nishnianidze, G. (1971). From the Archive of Laughter: Satire in the Service of Revolution. Tbilisi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Berger, A. A. (1999). An Anatomy of Humor. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brendon, P. (2008). The Dark Valley: A Panorama of the 1930s. Jonathan Cape. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Halloran, F. D. Thomas Nast: The Father of Modern Political Cartoons. University of North Carolina Press, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hobsbawm, E. (1994). The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. Michael Joseph. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. MacMillan, M. (2014). The War That Ended Peace: How Europe Abandoned Peace for the First World War. Random House Trade Paperbacks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Scully, R. (2025). The Political Cartoon: History and Historiography. In Cartoon Conflicts: Contemporary Controversies and Historical Precedents. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gaddis, J. L. (2006). The Cold War. Penguin Publishing Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Heale, M. J. (2004). Twentieth-Century America: Politics and Power in the United States 1900–2000. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Navasky, V. S. (2013). The Art of Controversy: Political Cartoons and Their Enduring Power. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Niangi Magazine. 04.11.1923, No. 16 Tbilisi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles