"Why Not Experiment with Odd Counts? Interpreting and Developing of the Balinese Musical form of ‘Gilak’”

This article examines the evolution and adaptation of gilak, a rhythmic cycle fundamental to traditional Balinese music, and its innovative use within contemporary Balinese compositions. Gilak, typically an eight-beat rhythmic pattern, has historically underscored dynamic forms such as Gong Kebyar, Bebonangan, and Gong Gede, lending a vibrant, pulse-driven character to Balinese ceremonial and processional music. In recent decades, Balinese composers have engaged deeply with gilak, reinterpreting it as both a structural and aesthetic device to create compositions that extend beyond conventional boundaries. This study examines how the gilak is reinterpreted by Balinese composers, contributing to hybrid and experimental works that bridge the tradition and innovation. Through an analysis of contemporary compositions and interviews with composers and performers, this article highlights gilak's role in shaping the modern Balinese soundscape, showcasing its impact on musical innovation and cultural continuity. It also provides insights into how gilak’s structural flexibility fosters creative expression while maintaining a strong connection to traditional Balinese cultural identity. The findings highlight the importance of gilak as a versatile motif that supports the continuity of Balinese musical heritage, even as it undergoes transformation. Ultimately, this article contributes to a broader understanding of how traditional motifs like gilak play a pivotal role in the development of Balinese music and offering a blueprint for future explorations in both local and global music contexts.

Keywords: Gilak, interpretation, innovation, cultural identity.

MUSIC

1. Arom, S. (1991). African Polyphony and Polyrhythm Musical Structure and Methodology. Canbridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arya Sugiartha, I. G. (2015). Bentuk dan Konsep Estetik Musik Tradisional Bali. Panggung, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v25i1.14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aryasa, I W.M. (1976/1977). Perkembangan Seni Karawitan Bali. Laporan Proyek Sasana Budaya Bali. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bakan, M. B. (1998). Walking Warriors: Battles of Culture and Ideology in the Balinese Gamelan Beleganjur World. Ethnomusicology, 42(3), 441. https://doi.org/10.2307/852850. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandem, I Made & Rembang, I Nyoman. (1983). Perkembangan Topeng Bali sebagai Seni Pertunjukan. Proyek Penggalian, Pembinaan, Pengembangan Seni Klasik/Tradisional dan Kesenian Baru Pemerintah Daerah Tingkat I Bali.Stephen Davies. (2007). The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,. 65(1), 21–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cristian, Utz. (2021). Musical Composition in the Context of Globalization New Perspectives on Music History in the 20th and 21st Century. Verlag. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dermott, V.M. (2013). Imagi-Nation: Mengubah Music Biasa Menjadi Luar Biasa. E. Setiawan (ed). Art Music Today. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deliège, I. and G. A. Wiggins (2006). Musical creativity: Multidisciplinary research in theory and practice. doi: 10.4324/9780203088111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dunbar-Hall, P. (2006). Reading Performance: The Case of Balinese Baris. Context: Journal of Music Research, 31, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Harnish, D. (2000). The world of music composition in Bali. Journal of Musicological Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411890008574780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kartawan, I. M. (2022). Melajah Nabuh : Teaching Balinese Gamelan within the Context of the University of Canterbury , Christchurch , New Zealand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kartawan, I.M. et al. (2024). Bridging Tradition and Modernity: Exploring Patutan (the modal system) in Balinese Music through the Hybrid Composition ‘Cane’. International Journal Visual and Performing Arts, 6 (2), 102 – 116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lewis, J. (2012). Music Cultures and Meanings: Music as Communication. Emperical Musicology Review, 7(1-2), pp. 98-101, doi:10.18061/1811/52987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. McGraw, A.C. (2008) Different Temporalities: The Time of Balinese Gamelan. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 40. pp. 136-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. McPhee, C. (1942). The Technique of Balinese Music. Bulletin of the American Musicological Society. 6, pp.2-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. McPhee, C. (1964). Music In Bali: A Study in Form and Instrumental Organization in Balinese Orchestral Music. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Raheb, K. El. et al., (2022) “Designing an Augmented Experience for a Music Archive: What does the Audience Need Beyond the Sense of Hearing?,” J. Comput. Cult. Herit., 15 (4), doi: 10.1145/3528366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rai S, I. W. (2022). Tabuh Telu Pegongan dalam Karawitan Bali. Pusat Penerbitan LP2MPP Institut Seni Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rembang, I Nyoman. (1985). Hasil Pendokumentasian Notasi Gending-Gending Lelambatan Klasik Pegongan Daerah Bali. Denpasar: Proyek Pengembangan Kesnian Bali. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Roeder, J., & Tenzer, M. (2012). Identity and genre in Gamelan Gong Kebyar: An analytical study of Gabor. Music Theory Spectrum, 34(1), 78–122. https://doi.org/10.1525/mts.2012.34.1.78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Small, C. (1998). Musicking. The Meaning of Performing and Listening. Wesleyan University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Smith, O. (2019). Genetic: An Analytical Study of the Contemporary Gamelan Music of Dewa Ketut Alit (Master Thesis). Redacted.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sosrowijaya, K.M. (2023). Transmission of Local and Traditional Music in Indonesian Popular Music (Case Studies of Indonesian Music Groups), Harmon. J. Music Arts, 1 (1), doi:10.61978/harmonia.v1i1.165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Steele, P. (2015). Split Centers: Gamelan Fusion Post-Multiculturalism. Perspectives of New Music, 53(1), pp. 189 – 217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Stephen Davies. (2007). Balinese Aesthetic. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,. 65(1), 21–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sudirana, W. (2024). Searching for the Unusual: New Methods of Composing for Gamelan. Contemporary Music Review, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2024.2391158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sudirana, W. (2013). Borrowing, Stealing, Transforming: Cross-cultural Influences in Balinese Neo-Traditional Composition. Performing Arts in Postmodern Bali Grazer Changing Interpretations, Founding Traditions. Kendra Steputat (ed). Shaker Verlag. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tenzer, M. (1998). Balinese Music. Singapore: Periplus Edition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tenzer, M. (2000). Gamelan Gong Kebyar : the Art of Twentieth-century Balinese Music. In Chicago studies in ethnomusicology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Willgoss, R. (2014). Creativity in Contemporary Art Music Composition. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music , 43( 2), pp. 423–437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. White, J.D. (1984). The Analysis of Music (2 ed). The Scarerow Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study