Winning Words: A Qualitative Analysis of Persuasive and Linguistic Rhetorical Strategies in Political Discourse during Election Campaign Period

This study aimed to identify and analyze the linguistic techniques present in campaign speech videos from the 2022 election campaign period. It specifically examined the types of persuasive and linguistic rhetorical techniques used, their functions, and their pragmatic implicatures. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing discourse analysis as an inquiry approach. Through purposive sampling, selected campaign speech videos were analyzed as the study's corpus. The findings revealed the presence of various persuasive and rhetorical linguistic techniques, including pillars and appeals and figures of speech and speech acts, each serving distinct persuasive functions within the speeches. Notably, the pillars were ethos, pathos, and logos. They were frequently used to establish credibility, evoke emotions, present logical arguments, and make appeals to safety, social, and self-esteem needs. Additionally, the speeches demonstrated a strategic use of figurative language, such as metaphor, analogy, hyperbole, parallelism, and metonymy to enhance audience engagement and message retention. Moreover, speech acts such as assertive, directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative were found to be among the most effective ways of linguistic persuasion. The study further analyzed the pragmatic implicatures of these techniques to deepen understanding of how linguistic strategies shaped political discourse and influenced public perception. Lastly, future researchers were encouraged to explore varied political contexts, discourse types, and analytical approaches to deepen insights into rhetorical strategies and their impact on public communication.

Humanities and Social Sciences, Linguistic Rhetorical Strategies

1. Abdihamitovna, S. N. (2024). The Concept of PoliticalText in Forensic Linguistic Expertise. VitalAnnex: International Journal of Novel Research in Advanced Sciences (2751-756X), 3(4), 134–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alfred, K., & Barte, M. (2023). Liberalism’s Other: Analyzing the Emergence of the Bobotante Signifier in the Philippines using Chantal Mouffe’s Critique of Liberal Political Theory. Social Ethics Society Journal of Applied Philosophy, 9,161–184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aliwie, A. N. A. (2024). A pragmatic analysis of persuasive arguments in the 2011 - 2020 US presidential campaign speeches. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alodat, A. M., Al-Qora'n, L. F. & Hamoud, M. A. (2023). Social Media Platforms and Political Participation: A Study of Jordanian Youth Engagement. Social Science, 12(7), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Auliya, A. N., Nasiwan, N. & Pratama, D. A. (2025). Analysis of political participation and online public discourse on democracy issues during the 2024 presidential election debate on Youtube. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 5(1), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v5i1.1173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Averill, J. B. (2023). Qualitative data analysis. Springer Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bartley, L. (2018). Forensic linguistics gives victims and the wrongfully convicted the voices they deserve. The Conversation. https://phys.org/news/2018-08-forensic-linguistics-victims-wrongfully-convicted.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bekele, W., & Ago, F. (2022). Sample Size for Interview in Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: A Guide to Novice Researchers. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 4(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2022.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bhandari, P. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved February 10, 2026, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Borja, A. L. A., Torneo, A. R., & Hecita, I. J. R. (2024). Challenges to Democratization from the Perspective of Political Inaction: Insights into Political Disempowerment and Citizenship in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 44(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034241239060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Sage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cadayday, B. A. R., Jimenez, D. M. & Boiser, S. M. (2024). Role of Social Media in the Political Landscape and Voting Decisions of Gen Zs in the Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 8(12), 720-730. https://doi.org/https:/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, Y. (2024). The Use of Metaphors in Online Contexts: A Rhetorical Analysis of Global Climate Change Discourse. Journal of Higher Education Research, 5(5), 410.https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v5i5.3041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cloutier, C., & Ravasi, D. (2021). Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020979329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dalgan, D. D., Kahar, Y. H., Tulud, D. M., & Amilbahar, R. M. C. (2025). A Pragmatic Analysis of FPRRD’s Quad Committee Hearing on Drug War Using Grice’s Maxims. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(2).448-461. http://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i2.2065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dholakia, N., Ozgun, A., & Atik, D. (2025). The Marketing of Populism and the Political-Economy of War: Learning from the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Journal of Macromarketing, 45(2), 249-263.https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467251330211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dommett, K. (2019). Data-driven political campaigns in practice: understanding and regulating diverse data-driven campaigns. Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, 8(4), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Eustaquio, T. L. (2023). VOTE FOR ME! THELANGUAGE OF PERSUASION USED BY PHILIPPINE PRESIDENTIABLES. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 14(2). 261-282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Garimella, A., Banea, C., & Mihalcea, R. (2023). Reflection of demographic background on word usage. Computational Linguistics, 49(2), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ghasemi, M. R., Moonaghi, H. K., & Heydari, A.(2020). Strategies for sustaining and enhancing nursing students' engagement in academic andclinical settings: a narrative review. Korean journal of medical education, 32(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2020.159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Grossman, E. (2024). Unveiling the Art of PoliticalPersuasion: A Linguistic analysis of politicians' speeches -. scienceknow.net.https://scienceknow.net/unveiling-political-persuasion-linguistic-analysis-politicians-speeches/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Harper, C. (2022). Contemporary politics in the Philippines shows how emotions can inform human rights advocacy. Melbourne Asia Review.https://melbourneasiareview.edu.au/contemporary-politics-in-the-philippines-shows-how-emotions-can-inform-human-rights-advocacy/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Heckmann, C. (2025). Ethos examples in literature, ads, speeches & more – StudioBinder. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/ethos-examples/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hudson, G. P. (2022). Aristotle and the 3 Methods of Persuasion. clarendonhousebooks. https://www.clarendonhousebooks.com/single-post/aristotle-and-the-3-methods-of-persuasion [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ivenz, P., & Polakova, P. (2024). Gen Z Students and Their Perceptions of Technology in the Process of Second Language Acquisition Based on the Language Proficiency Level. Arab World English Journal, 15(3): 3-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no3.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kim, Y. (2023). Absolutely Relative: How Education Shapes Voter Turnout in the United States. Social Indicators Research, 168(1-3), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03146-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mangad, J. V., Gaston, R. H., & Ulla, M. B. (2024). Examining the rhetorical landscape of political campaign slogans in the Philippines: a rhetorical-semantic analysis. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2417510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. McLeod, S. (2024). Introducing Discourse Analysis for Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15391.57762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mendoza, R. U., Domingo, C.L.C., Mendoza, G.A.S., & Yap, J.K. (2024). Local language in the context of political divides. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 34(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00105.men [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Morse, J. M. (2020). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Munkhchimegi, O. (2022). A SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS ON POLITICAL SPEECHES OF ELBEGDORJ TS. International Journal of Advanced Research in Basic Engineering Sciences and Technology (IJARBEST), 8(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Munyangeyo T. (2025) Effective Soundbites for Democracy: The Strategic Use of Political Slogans as Instruments of Steadfast Democratic Consciousness and Mobilisation in Africa. Global Journal of Political Science and Administration, 13(1), 36-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Obenza, B. N., Jay, L., & Baradillo, D. G. (2024). A POLITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE PHILIPPINE POLITICIANS’ SPEECH ACTS ON PEOPLE’S INITIATIVE: A FORENSIC LINGUISTICS STUDY. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v7i2.559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Olaniran, B., Williams, I. (2020). Social Media Effects: Hijacking Democracy and Civility in Civic Engagement. In: Jones, J., Trice, M. (eds) Platforms, Protests, and the Challenge of Networked Democracy. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7_5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Paget, D., Beardsworth, N., & Lynch, G. (2023). Campaign rallies and political meaning-making. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 61(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2023.2232163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Pandey, S. (2024). A Comparative Rhetorical Analysis of Trump and Biden’s Climate Change Speeches: Framing Strategies in Politics. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 55(2), 138-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816231225932 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Paoli, M. (2024). Hindrance to sustainable development: Global inequities, non‐progressive education and inadequate science‐policy dialogue. Microbial Biotechnology, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Raza, S., Imran, S., Shah, S.A.A., 2024. Critical Discourse Analysis of Discursive Strategies Utilized in Donald Trump and Joe Biden’s Inaugural Speeches. Al-Mahdi Research Journal (MRJ). 5(4), 245–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Riazi, M., Rezvani, R., & Ghanbar, H. (2023). Trustworthiness in L2 writing research: A review and analysis of qualitative articles in the Journal of Second Language Writing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Rojas, M., Méndez, A., & Watkins-Fassler, K. (2023). The hierarchy of needs empirical examination of Maslow’s theory and lessons for development. World Development, 165, 106185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sturt, B. (2024). Former Philippine President Duterte Makes Political Comeback Amid Usual Controversy. Thediplomat.com; The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2024/10/former-philippine-president-duterte-makes-political-comeback-amid-usual-controversy/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tatulici, A. (2020). Political Discourse and the Theory of Speech acts. Arsith | EIRP Proceedings. https://proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1653/1635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Tigno, J. (2023). Making Voter Education a Pillar of Democracy in the Philippines Why do voter education? https://cids.up.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Making-Voter-Education-a-Pillar-of-Democracy-in-the-Philippines.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Tise, J. C., Sperling, R. A., Dann, M. S., & Young, T. M. (2023). Teaching Postsecondary Students to Use Analogies as a Cognitive Learning Strategy: An Intervention. CBE life sciences education, 22(1), ar10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-05-0084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Tula, S. (2024). The Power of Rhetoric. Unpacking Political Speeches and their role in conflict escalation. Hivolda. https://www.academia.edu/125434966/The Power_of Rhetoric Unpacking_Political_Speeches_and_their_role_in_conflict_escalation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Unciano, G. R. S. (2025). he Politics of Anti-Corruption: Rhetorical Strategiesand Messaging by Philippine Legislators(with Gender-Comparative Analysis). The Ghietuary Research Consultancy in Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10607.50089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Valgarðsson, V., Jennings, W., Stoker, G., McKay, L., Devine, D., & Clarke, N. (2024). The Good Politician: Competence, Integrity and Authenticity in Seven Democracies. Political Studies, 73(2), 631-656. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217241261180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar