Work-Life Balance Policies and Human Resource Sustainability: Public Statistical Evidence from Malaysia’s MSMEs
Authors
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1015EC00040
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 10/15 | Page No: 438-447
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-12
Accepted: 2026-02-21
Published: 2026-05-02
Abstract
Work-life balance (WLB) policies are increasingly discussed as a lever for human resource sustainability, but evidence is often fragmented for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in emerging markets. This paper synthesizes publicly available official statistics to situate the workforce sustainability challenge in Malaysia’s MSME sector. MSMEs accounted for 37.4%–39.1% of Malaysia’s GDP and 47.8%–48.5% of total employment during 2021–2023, indicating that retention and well-being risks in MSMEs have macro-level consequences (DOSM, 2024a; DOSM, 2023). Complementary official releases show that average weekly hours worked remain high in key sectors, reaching around 44.5–47.6 hours per week in late 2023 and early 2024 (DOSM, 2024b).
Together with industry reporting on the difficulty of retaining talent, these patterns support the policy relevance of practical WLB bundles (flexibility, predictable scheduling, leave clarity, and workload safeguards) as part of sustainable HRM in resource-constrained SMEs.
Keywords
Work-life balance, human resource sustainability
Downloads
References
1. Beauregard, T. A., & Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 9–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bloom, N., Kretschmer, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2011). Are family-friendly workplace practices a valuable firm resource? Strategic Management Journal, 32(4), 343–367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2023). Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) Performance 2022. Latest release: 27 July 2023. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/micro-small--medium-enterprises-msmes-performance-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2024a). Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) Performance 2023. Latest release: 26 July 2024. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/micro-small--medium-enterprises-msmes-performance-2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2024b). Labour Productivity, First Quarter 2024. Latest release: 23 May 2024. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/labour-productivity-q12024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable Human Resource Management: A Conceptual and Exploratory Analysis from a Paradox Perspective. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gould-Williams, J. (2007). HR practices, organizational climate and employee outcomes: Evaluating social exchange relationships in local government. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(9), 1627–1647. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510–531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Yragui, N. L., Bodner, T. E., & Hanson, G. C. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Journal of Management, 35(4), 837–856. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1069–1089. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). Family supportive supervisor behaviors and organizational culture: Effects on work engagement and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 207–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria