Year Five Students' Perceptions of HOTS-Based 21st Century Learning (PAK-21) in Islamic Education: Interest, Understanding, Perceived learning skills, and Active Involvement

This study examined Year Five students' acceptance of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-based 21st Century Learning (Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21; PAK-21) in Islamic Education. Specifically, the study explored four dimensions of student acceptance: interest, understanding, Perceived learning skills, and active involvement. A quantitative cross-sectional descriptive survey design was employed. Data were collected from 102 Year Five students who had experienced HOTS-based PAK-21 learning activities in Islamic Education through purposive sampling. The instrument consisted of a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire, and the data were analysed using descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and skewness. The findings indicated that students reported high levels of acceptance across all four dimensions. The mean scores ranged from 4.34 to 4.48, with interest recording the highest mean (M = 4.48), followed by understanding (M = 4.47), Perceived learning skills (M = 4.44), and active involvement (M = 4.34). The response distributions were generally negatively skewed, indicating that most respondents selected favorable response categories. This pattern also suggests the possibility of a ceiling effect, where responses were concentrated at the upper end of the scale. Overall, the findings suggest that the participating students reported favorable perceptions of HOTS-based PAK-21 learning in Islamic Education. However, as the study relied on self-reported questionnaire data collected from a purposive sample within a single educational context, the findings should be interpreted as evidence of students' reported perceptions rather than as proof of learning effectiveness, HOTS mastery, or the effectiveness of the PAK-21 approach. Future studies are recommended to incorporate achievement measures, classroom observations, or mixed-methods designs to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of students' learning experiences.

21st Century Learning (PAK-21), Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), Student Acceptance

1. Ab. Halim Tamuri, & Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff. (2015). Kaedah pengajaran Pendidikan Islam. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah, S. H., & Nordin, Z. S. (2024). The impact of differentiated pedagogy on the improvement of higher-order thinking skills among Year 5 students in the Science subject at SK. St. Augustine (M), Meradong. International Journal of Modern Education, 6(21), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.621007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. AlSaqqaf, A., Hu, K. E-learning in Sabah, Malaysia: exploring K12 students’ participation, perceptions, and coping strategies during home-based learning. Discov Educ 4, 313 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00754-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fakhruddin, F. M., Ayub, A. F. M., Hassan, N. C., Mutalib, L. A., & Jaafar, W. M. W. (2023). Student learning engagement of Malaysian Tahfiz students: A qualitative study. Akademika, 93(3), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2023-9303-01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hannan Ahmad Nizar & Anuar Ahmad. (2025). Teachers' readiness towards 21st century learning (PAK21) in Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(12), 1814-1819. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to post-secondary education). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Pendidikan Islam Tahun Lima. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ministry of Education. (2020). Annual report 2019: Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ministry of Education. (2021). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025: Annual report 2020. Putrajaya: KPM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mohd Zeki, M. Z., Mazlan, N. H., Talib, N. Z., Mat Jusoh, A. M., & Moshidi, N. (2023). Accountability researchers of case study related to the teaching of Islamic education teachers in integration of higher order thinking skills (HOTS). Journal of Islamic Educational Research, 9, 22–39. https://doi.org/10.22452/jier.vol9no2023.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pajri, S., Sai'dy, S., Azizah, N., Saputra, M. I., & Asyha, A. F. (2025). Think Pair Share Strategy Supports Student Engagement in Islamic Education Lessons. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v26i3.1441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ramli, A. F., Rasul, M. S., & Omar, M. (2024). Issues and challenges in the implementation of professional development programs for design and technology teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(7), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Skerritt, C. (2023). Student voice and classroom practice: How students are consulted in contexts without traditions of student voice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(5), 955–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1979086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sun, Y., Chen, Z., & Li, L. (2025). Teaching creative thinking in the ELT context: Beliefs and practices. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251315235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zulkefly, M. Z., & Yusof, F. M. (2025). Comparison of student achievement through circumference board gamification between schools in Putrajaya. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(3), 50-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zulkefli, M., & Bin Jamil, A. I. (2024). Advancing Islamic education with game-based learning: principles, effects, and implementation obstacles. Journal of Islamic Educational Research, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22452/jier.vol10no1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Prophetic Ethics and Moral Resilience: An Innovative Framework for Navigating Contemporary Tribulations
• The Place of Security in Islam: A Study of Muslim Communities in Southwestern Nigeria
• Pedagogically Informed ICT Integration and Students’ Academic Learning in Islamic Education at Dato Harun National Secondary School