“Impact of Hybrid and Remote Work on Employee Productivity and Retention”
Authors
N/A (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000170
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 1892-1900
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-24
Accepted: 2026-05-30
Published: 2026-06-06
Abstract
The workplace is undergoing a significant transformation, as traditional measures of job performance are being reshaped by advancements in remote work technologies and artificial intelligence. The concept of hybrid work, which combines remote and in-office work arrangements, has gained significant attention in recent years, largely due to technological advancements and the growing demand for flexible work environments. Remote working, defined as performing job responsibilities outside the traditional office setting using digital tools and communication technologies, has become an integral part of this shift. While flexible work arrangements—such as work from home (WFH), hybrid, or fully remote setups—are not entirely new, their relevance and adoption were greatly accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly during the lockdowns that began in March 2020.
This period highlighted the critical role of remote work in maintaining business continuity and reshaping traditional workplace practices. . Both managers and employees are required to adapt to these changes, embracing new ways of working and evaluating performance in a more flexible, technology-driven environment. This paper explains how remote and hybrid working arrangements influence employee productivity, engagement, and retention, examining the benefits, challenges, and emerging trends in flexible work practices.
Keywords
“hybrid work,” “remote work,” “productivity,”
Downloads
References
1. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological science in the public interest, 16(2), 40-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Cisco. (2025). Cisco Global Hybrid Work Study 2025: Navigating hybrid work strategies in evolving workplaces. Cisco Newsroom. https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/dam/r/newsroom/pdfs/Cisco-Hybrid-Work-Study.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Moretti, A., Menna, F., Aulicino, M., Paoletta, M., Liguori, S., & Iolascon, G. (2020). Characterization of Home Working Population during COVID-19 Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Giancaspro, M. L., Manuti, A., Molino, M., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2021). Workload, Techno Overload, and Behavioral Stress During COVID-19 Emergency: The Role of Job Crafting in Remote Workers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Choudhury, P. R., Khanna, T., Makridis, C. A., & Schirmann, K. (2022, March 24). Is hybrid work the best of both worlds? Evidence from a field experiment. Harvard Business School Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3726239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Grobelny, J. (2023). Factors Driving the Workplace Well-Being of Individuals from Co-Located, Hybrid, and Virtual Teams: The Role of Team Type as an Environmental Factor in the Job Demand–Resources Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Wöhner, F. (2023). Work flexibly, travel more healthily? How telework and flextime affect active travel in Switzerland. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 174, 103748. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bartik, A., Cullen, Z., Glaeser, E., Luca, M., & Stanton, C. (2023). The rise of remote work: Evidence on productivity and preferences from firm and worker surveys (Working Paper No. 20-138). Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=58329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Karthikeyan, A., & Kavitha, K. (2024). A comparative study of remote, hybrid, and in-office working modes in IT sector. International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM), 4(3), 586–591. http://www.ijhssm.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Sahu, N., & Singh, R. P. (2024). Impact of remote and hybrid work arrangements on employees’ productivity and well-being. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology (IJIRT), 10(12), 912–[end page if available]. https://www.ijirt.org/164290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria