Effect of Yeast Fermented Feed on Native Sheep of Bangladesh

Experiment was done with yeast (S. cerevisiae) fermented roughage (Rice straw and Sugarcane bagasse) with yeast fermented concentrate (Wheat bran and Rice polish). 12 no. of growing sheep was used for feed trial divided into 3 treatment groups named T0, T1, and T2. Groups were supplied by 4.5, 4.0, and 3.0 kg feed respectively. Nutritional composition of feed were analyzed by the AOAC method (2011) and provided same amount of nutrition for each group. 1125g, 1000g, and 750g feed/animal/day were supplied in T0, T1, and T2 groups respectively. Control T0 was supplied (85% green grass and 15%concentrate mixture). The T1 group was supplied by (60% green grass, 20% fermented roughage, and 20% fermented concentrate mixture) and the T2 group was supplied by (60% fermented roughage and 40% fermented concentrate mixture). The result found that nutrient intake; feed digestibility and body growth was better in fermented feed-supplied groups in T1 and T2 than in the control group T0. DMI was 510.59 (g/d), 405.08 (g/d) respectively in T2 and T1 group whether 356.90 (g/d) in T0 group .CPI was 61.93, 48.61(g/d), and EEI was 18.84, 15.96 (g/d) in T2 and T1 groups respectively whereas CPI was 41.54 and EEI was 15.81 g/d in the T0 group respectively. TAI was 45.34 (g/d), 37.26 (g/d) and NFEI was 278.14 (g/d), 189.66 (g/d) in T2 and T1 groups where TAI was 32.83 and NFEI was 156.64 g/d in T0 group. OMI was 465.25 and 367.81 g/d in T2 and T1 group respectively, whereas, 324.06 g/d in T0 group. Growth performance was best in the T2 group. Total body weight gain (kg) during the trial period was 7.92 and 7.4 kg in T2 and T1 groups respectively and 5.3 kg in the T0 group. Daily weight gain was 66.0 and 62.20 g/d T2 and T1 groups and 44.16 g/d in the T0 group. However, Due to more DM intake in the T2 group, the FCR of feed was best in the T1 group which was 6.81 (kg feed/kg gains) while in T0 and T2 group the FCR was 8.39 and 7.85 (kg feed/kg gains). Result also showed that DMI (g/ kgW0.75), and CPI (g/kgW0.75) was better in T2 group these were 72.82, and 8.80 (g/ kgW0.75) respectively and 57.45, and 6.89 (g/kgW0.75) respectively in T1 group whether, 55.07, and 6.41 (g/kgW0.75) respectively in T0 group. Digestibility was better in fermented feed supplied group T1 and T2 than in control group T0. DM, CP, and CF digestibility was 72.48%, 80.72%, and 77.71% in T1 group respectively and 72.38%, 81.50%, and 72.24% in T2 group respectively where 62.25%, 71.04%, and 71.16% in T0 group respectively. EE and OM digestibility was 82.74%, and 73.95% respectively in the T1 group and 79.50%, and 74.15% respectively in the T2 group while 74.74% and 64.70% in the T0 group respectively. Results also showed that the fermentation of feed was cost-effective. In conclusion, Yeast fermented feed improve the growth rate of sheep by increasing the nutrient intake and digestibility.

Keywords

SSF (Solid state fermentation), Yeast (S. cerevisiae), Nutrient intake, digestibility, growth of sheep.

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Adejuwon, K. P., Osundahunsi, O. F., Akinola, S. A., Oluwamukomi, M. O., & Mwanza, M. (2021). Effect of fermentation on nutritional quality, growth and hematological parameters of rats fed sorghum‐soybean‐orange flesh sweet potato complementary diet. Food Science & Nutrition, 9(2), 639-650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afify, A. E. M. M., El-Beltagi, H. S., Abd El-Salam, S. M., & Omran, A. A. (2011). Bioavailability of iron, zinc, phytate and phytase activity during soaking and germination of white sorghum varieties. Plos one, 6(10), e25512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akinfemi, A., & Ogunwole, O. A. (2012). Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of rice straw treated with Pleurotus ostreatus, Pleurotus pulmonarius and Pleurotus tuber-regium. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 45(1), 14-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Akinola, S. A., & Osundahunsi, O. F. (2017). Lactic acid bacteria and yeast diversities in spontaneously fermented millet sourdoughs. The Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 6(4), 1030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Akinola, S. A., & Osundahunsi, O. F. (2017). Lactic acid bacteria and yeast diversities in spontaneously fermented millet sourdoughs. The Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 6(4), 1030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Awais, M., Alam, S., Wali, N., Mehmood, R., Nasir, U., & Waheed, A. (2021). Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Bacteria-Based Probiotics to Fungi-Based Probiotics. J Sharif Med Dental Coll Lahore, 7(1), 21-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beauchemin, K. A., Yang, W. Z., Morgavi, D. P., Ghorbani, G. R., Kautz, W., & Leedle, J. A. Z. (2003). Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 81(6), 1628-1640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Belewu, M. A., Ayinde, O. E., & Morakinyo, A. O. (2007). Biochemical changes of some waste agricultural residues after solid state fermantation. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 13(2), 161-164.chnology, 172(5), 2747-2757. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Călinoiu, L. F., Cătoi, A. F., & Vodnar, D. C. (2019). Solid-state yeast fermented wheat and oat bran as a route for delivery of antioxidants. Antioxidants, 8(9), 372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Callaway, E. S., & Martin, S. A. (1997). Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. Journal of dairy science, 80(9), 2035-2044. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cao, Y., Takahashi, T., Horiguchi, K. I., Yoshida, N., & Cai, Y. (2010). Methane emissions from sheep fed fermented or non-fermented total mixed ration containing whole-crop rice and rice bran. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 157(1-2), 72-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Ameilbonne, A., Auffret, P., Bernard, M., Mialon, M. M., Dunière, L., & Forano, E. (2019). Supplementation of live yeast based feed additive in early life promotes rumen microbial colonization and fibrolytic potential in lambs. Scientific reports, 9(1), 19216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Costa, S. M. D., Aguiar, A., Luz, S. M., Pessoa, A., & Costa, S. A. D. (2015). Sugarcane straw and its cellulosic fraction as raw materials for obtainment of textile fibers and other bioproducts. Polysaccharides, 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Crossland, W. L., Norris, A. B., Tedeschi, L. O., & Callaway, T. R. (2018). Effects of active dry yeast on ruminal pH characteristics and energy partitioning of finishing steers under thermoneutral or heat-stressed environment. Journal of animal science, 96(7), 2861-2876. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dai, Z., Cui, L., Li, J., Wang, B., Guo, L., Wu, Z., ... & Wu, G. (2020). Fermentation techniques in feed production. In Animal agriculture (pp. 407-429). Academic press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Damisa, D., Sule, E. I., & Moneme, S. (2012). Cellulase production from waste paper using Trichoderma species isolated from rhizospheric soil. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(97), 16342-16346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Danesi, E. D. G., Miguel, Â. S. M., de Oliveira Rangel-Yagui, C., De Carvalho, J. C. M., & Pessoa Jr, A. (2006). Effect of carbon: nitrogen ratio (C: N) and substrate source on glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) production by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of food Engineering, 75(1), 96-103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Day, C. N., & Morawicki, R. O. (2018). Effects of fermentation by yeast and amylolytic lactic acid bacteria on grain sorghum protein content and digestibility. Journal of Food Quality, 2018(1), 3964392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Desnoyers, M., Giger-Reverdin, S., Bertin, G., Duvaux-Ponter, C., & Sauvant, D. (2009). Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(4), 1620-1632. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Dias, A. L. G., Freitas, J. A., Micai, B., Azevedo, R. A., Greco, L. F., & Santos, J. E. P. (2018). Effect of supplemental yeast culture and dietary starch content on rumen fermentation and digestion in dairy cows. Journal of dairy science, 101(1), 201-221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dobrzański, Z., Dolińska, B., Chojnacka, K., Opaliński, S., & Ryszka, F. (2006). The use of yeasts in livestock feeding. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Eastridge, M. L. (2006). Major advances in applied dairy cattle nutrition. Journal of dairy science, 89(4), 1311-1323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Elghandour, M. M., Chagoyán, J. C. V., Salem, A. Z., Kholif, A. E., Castañeda, J. S. M., Camacho, L. M., & Buendía, G. (2014). In vitro fermentative capacity of equine fecal inocula of 9 fibrous forages in the presence of different doses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 34(5), 619-625. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Elghandour, M. M., Kholif, A. E., Hernández, A., Salem, A. Z., Mellado, M., & Odongo, N. E. (2017). Effects of organic acid salts on ruminal biogas production and fermentation kinetics of total mixed rations with different maize silage to concentrate ratios. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 523-530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Erasmus, L. J., Robinson, P. H., Ahmadi, A., Hinders, R., & Garrett, J. E. (2005). Influence of prepartum and postpartum supplementation of a yeast culture and monensin, or both, on ruminal fermentation and performance of multiparous dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 122(3-4), 219-239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Feng, Y., Wang, L., Khan, A., Zhao, R., Wei, S., & Jing, X. (2020). Fermented wheat bran by xylanase-producing Bacillus cereus boosts the intestinal microflora of broiler chickens. Poultry science, 99(1), 263-271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Garcia‐Mazcorro, J. F., Rodriguez‐Herrera, M. V., Marroquin‐Cardona, A. G., & Kawas, J. R. (2019). The health enhancer yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in two types of commercial products for animal nutrition. Letters in applied microbiology, 68(5), 472-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ghazanfar, S., Anjum, M. I., Azim, A., & Ahmed, I. (2015). Effects of dietary supplementation of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on growth performance, blood parameters, nutrient digestibility and fecal flora of dairy heifers. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 25(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Gong, Y. L., Liao, X. D., Liang, J. B., Jahromi, M. F., Wang, H., Cao, Z., & Wu, Y. B. (2013). Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells decreased in vitro methane production in intestinal content of pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26(6), 856. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Gupta, S., Lee, J. J., & Chen, W. N. (2018). Analysis of improved nutritional composition of potential functional food (Okara) after probiotic solid-state fermentation. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 66(21), 5373-5381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Haddad, S. G., & Goussous, S. N. (2005). Effect of yeast culture supplementation on nutrient intake, digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 118(3-4), 343-348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hristov, A. N., Lee, C., Cassidy, T., Heyler, K., Tekippe, J. A., Varga, G. A., ... & Brandt, R. C. (2013). Effect of Origanum vulgare L. leaves on rumen fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(2), 1189-1202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hristov, A. N., Varga, G., Cassidy, T., Long, M., Heyler, K., Karnati, S. A., ... & Yoon, I. (2010). Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on ruminal fermentation and nutrient utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(2), 682-692. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hu, J., Lin, Y., Zhang, Z., Xiang, T., Mei, Y., Zhao, S., ... & Peng, N. (2016). High-titer lactic acid production by Lactobacillus pentosus FL0421 from corn stover using fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 214, 74-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Huyen, D. T., Tabelin, C. B., Thuan, H. M., Dang, D. H., Truong, P. T., Vongphuthone, B., ... & Igarashi, T. (2019). Geological and geochemical characterizations of sediments in six borehole cores from the arsenic-contaminated aquifer of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Data in brief, 25, 104230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Irakli, M., Lazaridou, A., & Biliaderis, C. G. (2020). Comparative evaluation of the nutritional, antinutritional, functional, and bioactivity attributes of rice bran stabilized by different heat treatments. Foods, 10(1), 57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Jan, S., Kumar, K., Yadav, A. N., Ahmed, N., Thakur, P., Chauhan, D., ... & Dhaliwal, H. S. (2022). Effect of diverse fermentation treatments on nutritional composition, bioactive components, and anti-nutritional factors of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.). Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 10(1), 46-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Jouany, J. P., Gobert, J., Medina, B., Bertin, G., & Julliand, V. (2008). Effect of live yeast culture supplementation on apparent digestibility and rate of passage in horses fed a high-fiber or high-starch diet. Journal of Animal Science, 86(2), 339-347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Khalouei, H., Seranatne, V., Fehr, K., Guo, J., Yoon, I., Khafipour, E., & Plaizier, J. C. (2020). Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products and subacute ruminal acidosis on feed intake, fermentation, and nutrient digestibilities in lactating dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 101(1), 143-157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Khampa, S., Chuelong, S., Kosonkittiumporn, S., & Khejornsart, P. (2010). Manipulation of yeast fermented cassava chip supplementation in dairy heifer raised under tropical condition. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9(10), 950-954. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kraler, M., Schedle, K., Domig, K. J., Heine, D., Michlmayr, H., & Kneifel, W. (2014). Effects of fermented and extruded wheat bran on total tract apparent digestibility of nutrients, minerals and energy in growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 197, 121-129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kupski, L., Cipolatti, E., Rocha, M. D., Oliveira, M. D. S., Souza-Soares, L. D. A., & Badiale-Furlong, E. (2012). Solid-state fermentation for the enrichment and extraction of proteins and antioxidant compounds in rice bran by Rhizopus oryzae. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 55, 937-942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Lascano, G. J., Heinrichs, A. J., & Tricarico, J. M. (2012). Substitution of starch by soluble fiber and Saccharomyces cerevisiae dose response on nutrient digestion and blood metabolites for precision-fed dairy heifers. Journal of dairy science, 95(6), 3298-3309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Li, R., Jiang, D., Zheng, M., Tian, P., Zheng, M., & Xu, C. (2020). Microbial community dynamics during alfalfa silage with or without clostridial fermentation. Scientific reports, 10(1), 17782. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Lin, W. C., & Lee, T. T. (2020). Effects of Laetiporus sulphureus-fermented wheat bran on growth performance, intestinal microbiota and digesta characteristics in broiler chickens. Animals, 10(9), 1457. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Ma, L., Wang, H., Qiu, Y., Bai, Z., Yang, Z., Li, E., ... & Xiao, D. (2024). Alternative Uses of Fermented Wheat Bran: A Mini Review. Fermentation, 10(12), 611. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ma, X., Wang, J., Gao, M., Wang, N., Li, C., & Wang, Q. (2021). Effect of pH regulation mode on byproduct ethanol generated from the lactic acid fermentation of Sophora flavescens residues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123536. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Mahmoud, E., Sorour, M. A., Hussein, M. S., & Hassan, M. A. (2022). Impact of solid state fermentation on chemical composition, functional properties, and antioxidant activity of wheat bran. Journal of Sohag Agriscience (JSAS), 7(1), 41-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Malekkhahi, M., Tahmasbi, A. M., Naserian, A. A., Danesh Mesgaran, M., Kleen, J. L., & Parand, A. A. (2015). Effects of essential oils, yeast culture and malate on rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, growth performance and nutrient digestibility of Baluchi lambs fed high‐concentrate diets. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 99(2), 221-229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Manlapig, J. J. D., & Matsui, H. (2025). Production and utilization of fermented rice bran as animal feed. Animal Science Journal, 96(1), e70037. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Mao, M., Wang, P., Shi, K., Lu, Z., Bie, X., Zhao, H., ... & Lv, F. (2020). Effect of solid state fermentation by Enterococcus faecalis M2 on antioxidant and nutritional properties of wheat bran. Journal of Cereal Science, 94, 102997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Mbata, T. I., Ikenebomeh, M. J., & Alaneme, J. C. (2009). Studies on the microbiological, nutrient composition and antinutritional contents of fermented maize flour fortified with bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranean L). African Journal of Food Science, 3(6), 165-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Miller-Webster, T., Hoover, W. H., Holt, M., & Nocek, J. E. (2002). Influence of yeast culture on ruminal microbial metabolism in continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(8), 2009-2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Minnaar, P. P., Du Plessis, H. W., Paulsen, V., Ntushelo, N., Jolly, N. P., & Du Toit, M. (2017). Saccharomyces cerevisiae, non-Saccharomyces yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in sequential fermentations: Effect on phenolics and sensory attributes of South African Syrah wines. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 38(2), 237-244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Moncoulon, R., & Auclair, E. (2001). Utilisation du BIOSAF® Sc 47 pour la production de viande de taurillon. Rapport de Recherche, 17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Mwenya, B., Santoso, B., Sar, C., Gamo, Y., Kobayashi, T., Arai, I., & Takahashi, J. (2004). Effects of including β1–4 galacto-oligosaccharides, lactic acid bacteria or yeast culture on methanogenesis as well as energy and nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 115(3-4), 313-326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Ojokoh, A. O., Alade, R. A., Ozabor, P. T., & Fadahunsi, I. F. (2020). Effect of fermentation on sorghum and cowpea flour blends. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 39-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Ojokoh, A. O., Daramola, M. K., & Oluoti, O. J. (2013). Effect of fermentation on nutrient and anti-nutrient composition of breadfruit (Treculia africana) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) blend flours. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(27), 3566-3570. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Ojokoh, A., & Bello, B. (2014). Effect of fermentation on nutrient and anti-nutrient composition of millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and soyabean (Glycine max) blend flours. Journal of Life Sciences, 8(8). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Onyango, C. A., Ochanda, S. O., Mwasaru, M. A., Ochieng, J. K., Mathooko, F. M., & Kinyuru, J. N. (2013). Effects of malting and fermentation on anti-nutrient reduction and protein digestibility of red sorghum, white sorghum and pearl millet. Journal of Food Research, 2(1), 41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Osman, M. A. (2011). Effect of traditional fermentation process on the nutrient and antinutrient contents of pearl millet during preparation of Lohoh. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 10(1), 1-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Pandey, A., Soccol, C. R., Nigam, P., & Soccol, V. T. (2000). Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: sugarcane bagasse. Bioresource technology, 74(1), 69-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Phesatcha, K., Phesatcha, B., Chunwijitra, K., Wanapat, M., & Cherdthong, A. (2021). Changed rumen fermentation, blood parameters, and microbial population in fattening steers receiving a high concentrate diet with Saccharomyces cerevisiae improve growth performance. Veterinary sciences, 8(12), 294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Pothiraj, C., Arun, A., & Eyini, M. (2015). Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cassava waste for ethanol production. Biofuel Research Journal, 2(1), 196-202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Promkot, C., Nitipothn, P., Piampol, N., Kanthaprom, S., & Doungmawong, S. (2015). Animal Nutrition AN-215 Effect of yeast fermented fresh cassava root fed beef cattle on digestibility. Sustainable Animal Agriculture for Developing Countries, 228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Samadi, S., Wajizah, S., Usman, Y., Riayatsyah, D., & Al Firdausyi, Z. (2016). Improving sugarcane bagasse as animal feed by ammoniation and followed by fermentation with Trichoderma harzianum (in vitro study). Animal Production, 18(1), 14-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Sarnklong, C., Cone, J. W., Pellikaan, W., & Hendriks, W. H. (2010). Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: a review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 23(5), 680-692. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Sawsan, M., Ali, A., Ayhem, D., & Wissam, Z. (2021). Optimization of bakers yeast production on grape juice using response surface methodology. Acta Periodica Technologica, (52), 89-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Sharath, B. S., Mohankumar, B. V., & Somashekar, D. (2014). Bio-detoxification of phorbol esters and other anti-nutrients of Jatropha curcas seed cake by fungal cultures using solid-state fermentation. Applied biochemistry and biote [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. So, S., Cherdthong, A., & Wanapat, M. (2020). Improving sugarcane bagasse quality as ruminant feed with Lactobacillus, cellulase, and molasses. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 62(5), 648. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Sousa, D. O., Oliveira, C. A., Velasquez, A. V., Souza, J. M., Chevaux, E., Mari, L. J., & Silva, L. F. P. (2018). Live yeast supplementation improves rumen fibre degradation in cattle grazing tropical pastures throughout the year. Animal feed science and technology, 236, 149-158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Song, B., Wu, T., You, P., Wang, H., Burke, J. L., Kang, K., ... & Sun, X. (2021). Dietary supplementation of yeast culture into pelleted total mixed rations improves the growth performance of fattening lambs. Frontiers in veterinary science, 8, 657816. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Sripriya, G., Antony, U., & Chandra, T. S. (1997). Changes in carbohydrate, free amino acids, organic acids, phytate and HCl extractability of minerals during germination and fermentation of finger millet (Eleusine coracana). Food chemistry, 58(4), 345-350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Tan, Z. L., Lu, D. X., Hu, M., Niu, W. Y., Han, C. Y., Ren, X. P., ... & Lin, S. L. (2002). Effect of dietary structural to nonstructural carbohydrate ratio on rumen degradability and digestibility of fiber fractions of wheat straw in sheep. Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 15(11), 1591-1598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Touijer, H., Benchemsi, N., Ettayebi, M., Janati Idrissi, A., Chaouni, B., & Bekkari, H. (2019). Thermostable Cellulases from the Yeast Trichosporon sp. Enzyme research, 2019(1), 2790414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Ullah, A., Orij, R., Brul, S., & Smits, G. J. (2012). Quantitative analysis of the modes of growth inhibition by weak organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and environmental microbiology, 78(23), 8377-8387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Ullah, A., Sharif, M., Mirza, M. A., Siaf-ur-Rehman, M., & Hayder, A. U. (2017). Effect of different levels of yeast culture on digestibility, nitrogen balance and ruminal characteristics in buffalo bulls. Buffalo Bulletin, 36(4), 653-660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Van Soest, W. R., Chu, Q. P., & Mulder, J. A. (2006). Combined feedback linearization and constrained model predictive control for entry flight. Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 29(2), 427-434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Veerabhadrappa, M. B., Shivakumar, S. B., & Devappa, S. (2014). Solid-state fermentation of Jatropha seed cake for optimization of lipase, protease and detoxification of anti-nutrients in Jatropha seed cake using Aspergillus versicolor CJS-98. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 117(2), 208-214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Wang, J., Zhao, G., Zhuang, Y., Chai, J., & Zhang, N. (2022). Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture promotes the performance of fattening sheep by enhancing nutrients digestibility and rumen development. Fermentation, 8(12), 719. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Wang, W., Wang, Y., Cui, Z., Yang, Y., An, X., & Qi, J. (2022). Fermented wheat bran polysaccharides intervention alters rumen bacterial community and promotes rumen development and growth performance in lambs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 841406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Wang, H., Su, M., Wang, C., Li, D., Li, Q., Liu, Z., ... & Ma, Y. (2023). Yeast culture repairs rumen epithelial injury by regulating microbial communities and metabolites in sheep. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1305772. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Xu, J., Li, X., Fan, Q., Zhao, S., & Jiao, T. (2025). Effects of yeast culture on lamb growth performance, rumen microbiota, and metabolites. Animals, 15(5), 738. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Yohanista, M., Sofjan, O., & Widodo, E. (2014). Evaluasi nutrisi campuran onggok dan ampas tahu terfermentasi Aspergillus niger, Rizhopus oligosporus dan kombinasi sebagai bahan pakan pengganti tepung jagung. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 24(2), 72-83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Zayed, M. S. (2018). Enhancement the feeding value of rice straw as animal fodder through microbial inoculants and physical treatments. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 7(2), 117-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Zhang, A. R., Wei, M., Yan, L., Zhou, G. L., Li, Y., Wang, H. M., ... & Liang, Y. X. (2022). Effects of feeding solid-state fermented wheat bran on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Poultry science, 101(1), 101402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Zhang, Z. X., Wang, L. R., Xu, Y. S., Jiang, W. T., Shi, T. Q., Sun, X. M., & Huang, H. (2021). Recent advances in the application of multiplex genome editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 105(10), 3873-3882. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Zhao, H. M., Guo, X. N., & Zhu, K. X. (2017). Impact of solid state fermentation on nutritional, physical and flavor properties of wheat bran. Food Chemistry, 217, 28-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Zhang, H., Tan, Y., Wei, J., Du, H., & Xu, Y. (2022). Fungal interactions strengthen the diversity-functioning relationship of solid-state fermentation systems. Msystems, 7(4), e00401-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Effect of Yeast Fermented Feed on Native Sheep of Bangladesh

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles