Renegotiating the Psychological Contract in Hybrid Work: A Conceptual Framework for Employee Well-Being

Hybrid work is now a structural feature of the post-pandemic workplace, but organisational policy has moved faster than the psychological recalibration it demands from employers and employees alike. This paper argues that the real link between HR policy change and employee well-being is not remote work itself, but the perception of a psychological contract breach that arises when implicit obligations around trust, autonomy, surveillance, and flexibility are altered without adequate renegotiation. Building on Rousseau’s (1989, 1995) psychological contract theory, and drawing on Social Exchange Theory, Conservation of Resources Theory, and the Job Demands-Resources model, the paper proposes an original Psychological Contract Renegotiation Framework (PCRF) for hybrid arrangements. The framework identifies four contract zones - trust calibration, surveillance tolerance, flexibility reciprocity, and presence equity - as the domains in which the implicit employer-employee bargain is renegotiated or breached under hybrid conditions. The analysis draws on current evidence, including Amazon’s 2024 return-to-office mandate, Gallup and Owl Labs workplace data, a large-scale Nature study, and recent peer-reviewed research on hybrid work outcomes. The paper concludes that proactive renegotiation mechanisms - deliberate dialogue, psychological safety, and policy transparency - are the primary levers for protecting well-being in the hybrid era.

psychological contract, hybrid work, employee well-being, HRM policy, contract breach, renegotiation framework, trust, surveillance, flexibility

1. AIHR. (2025). What is a psychological contract: Types with examples. https://www.aihr.com/blog/psychological-contract/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Dorsey Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2021). Why working from home will stick. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 28731. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630, 920-925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chakraborty, S., & Pandey, S. (2025). Are remote workers innovative? The interplay between psychological contract and innovative work behaviour with mediating role of work engagement. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251399790 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chu, C. C., & Chou, C. Y. (2024). Hybrid work stressors and psychological withdrawal behavior: A moderated mediation model of emotional exhaustion and proactive personality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 155, 104053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cohen, S. R., & Liu, X. (2024). Psychological contracts: Changing relational levels, a dynamic model for a changing environment. Southeast Business Research Association Journal, 3(1), 17-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dara, D., Febriantina, S., & Suwatno, S. (2025). Enhancing well-being in hybrid work: The crucial role of organizational support for Indonesia’s State Civil Apparatus. Cogent Psychology, 12(1), Article 2454084. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2454084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ding, Y., & Ma, M. S. (2023). Return-to-office mandates. SSRN Working Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4675401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Faizan, M., Yousaf, A., & Khan, S. M. (2025). Psychological contract breach and its consequences on employee turnover intentions, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Insights from human resource management and workplace psychology. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v4i3.164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fayard, A.-L., & Weeks, J. (2025). The workplace psychological contract is broken. Here’s how to fix it. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2025/05/the-workplace-psychological-contract-is-broken-heres-how-to-fix-it [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gazi, M. A. I., Masud, A. A., Kaium, M. A., Amin, M. B., Hossain, M. A., Senathirajah, A. R. b. S., & Abdullah, M. (2025). Unraveling employee life satisfaction: Exploring the impact of psychological contract breach, self-efficacy, mental health, and abusive supervision, with work engagement and job satisfaction as mediators. Cogent Psychology, 12(1), Article 2455783. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2455783 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gong, B., & Sims, R. L. (2023). Psychological contract breach during the pandemic: How an abrupt transition to a work from home schedule impacted the employment relationship. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Great Place to Work. (2024). How return-to-office mandates pose risks to productivity, well-being, and retention. https://www.greatplacetowork.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gutworth, M. B., Howard, M. C., & Simonet, D. V. (2024). Mandated but willing? Preferences and expectations among mandatory work from home employees. Human Resource Management Journal, 34(3), 627-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12498 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. HR Executive. (2025). 7 crises that tested HR in 2025 and shaped 2026 strategy. https://hrexecutive.com/7-crises-that-tested-hr-in-2025-and-shaped-2026-strategy/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kalmanovich-Cohen, H. (2025). Return-to-office mandates and workplace inequality: Implications for industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2025.10019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., Mandl, H. J., & Solley, C. M. (1962). Men, management, and mental health. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mateen, A., Khoso, R. A., Ullah, W., Shakil, M., & Latif, A. (2025). Employee well-being in hybrid work environments: Balancing productivity, preventing digital burnout, and promoting mental health in the era of remote and flexible work. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v4i4.180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mohase, K., Donald, F., & Israel, N. (2025). Inclusive leadership, psychological safety, and employee voice in remote and hybrid work employees. South African Journal of Psychology, 55(3), 432-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/00812463251365484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226-256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ocampo, L., Alinsub, J., & Bacunador, A. M. (2023). Psychological contract breach and job satisfaction: A structural model. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Olson, M. H. (1983). Remote office work: Changing work patterns in space and time. Communications of the ACM, 26(3), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1145/358061.358068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Owl Labs. (2025). State of hybrid work report 2025. https://owllabs.com/state-of-hybrid-work/2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1379(200008)21:5<525::AID-JOB40>3.0.CO;2-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Schein, E. H. (1965). Organizational psychology. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Hildrum, J., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., & Mendez, D. (2023). Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies. Journal of Systems and Software, 195, 111552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Baldassarre, M. T., Calefato, F., Travassos, G. H., Floryan, M., Kalinowski, M., Mendez, D., Pereira, G. B., Storey, M.-A., & Prikladnicki, R. (2025). Who “controls” where work shall be done? State-of-practice in post-pandemic remote work regulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15743. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Trevino Garcia, L. E., & Christensen, J. O. (2025). Hybrid work and mental distress: A cross-sectional study of 24,763 office workers in the Norwegian public sector. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 98(4-5), 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-025-02136-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Van Dijcke, D., Gunsilius, F., & Wright, A. (2024). Return to office and the tenure distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of Jobs Report 2025. WEF. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria