Budgeting and Financial Reporting Practices in Selected Public Elementary Schools in Parañaque: Inputs to Financial Management Capability Enhancement

Financial management is fundamental to ensuring transparency, accountability, and operational efficiency in public educational institutions. Effective budgeting practices facilitate the efficient allocation and utilization of limited financial resources, while sound financial reporting promotes responsible governance and informed decision-making. Despite the implementation of financial management policies in the Philippine basic education system, empirical evidence on budgeting and financial reporting practices in public elementary schools remains limited, particularly at the local level. This study assessed budgeting practices in terms of allocation accuracy, expense monitoring, and compliance with standards, and financial reporting practices in terms of transparency and clarity, flexibility and adaptability, and participation and collaboration among selected public elementary schools in Parañaque City. It also determined differences in respondents' assessments, examined the relationship between budgeting and financial reporting practices, and identified implementation challenges. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, data were collected from 39 respondents, comprising school administrators and administrative personnel, through a validated, researcher-developed questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, an independent-samples t-test, and a Pearson product-moment correlation were employed to analyze the data. The findings revealed that budgeting and financial reporting practices were implemented effectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the assessments of the two respondent groups. However, budgeting practices demonstrated significant positive relationships with financial reporting practices, indicating that effective budgeting contributes to improved transparency, accountability, and reporting efficiency. The study also identified operational challenges associated with documentation, regulatory compliance, and continuous competency development. The findings underscore the importance of sustained professional development and institutional support to strengthen financial governance and accountability in public elementary schools.

Budgeting practices, financial reporting, financial management, accountability

1. Anessi-Pessina, E., Barbera, C., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Public sector budgeting: A European review of accounting and public management journals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(3), 491–519. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-11-2013-1532 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/faam.12049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(3), 527–531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bracci, E., Humphrey, C., Moll, J., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Public sector accounting, accountability and austerity: More than balancing the books? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(6), 878–908. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2009). Performance management systems: A conceptual model. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 283–295. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2017). Twenty-five years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44. doi:10.1111/puar.12685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. de Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111–134. doi:10.1111/gove.12021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. doi:10.1177/031289629101600103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dubnick, M. J. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376–417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dwangu, A. M., & Mahlangu, V. P. (2021). Accountability in the financial management practices of school principals. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(7), 1504–1524. doi:10.1108/IJEM-06-2021-0243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. The article by Dwangu and Mahlangu was published in International Journal of Educational Management, volume 35, issue 7, pages 1504–1524, rather than in one of the previously listed generic Philippine or international journals. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ferry, L., Eckersley, P., & Zakaria, Z. (2015). Accountability and transparency in English local government: Moving from matching parts to acknowledged purposes. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(3), 345–361. doi:10.1111/faam.12060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671. doi:10.1080/09614520701469955 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Garcer, A., & Mestry, R. (2024). A blueprint for implementing internal financial processes in public schools. South African Journal of Education, 44(Supplement 1), S1–S11. doi:10.15700/saje.v44ns1a2585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 50–73. doi:10.1177/0020852311429667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. doi:10.1111/puar.12047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hyndman, N., & Liguori, M. (2016). Public sector reforms: Changing contours on an NPM landscape. Financial Accountability & Management, 32(1), 5–32. doi:10.1111/faam.12078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of multiple accountabilities disorder. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lapsley, I. (2009). New Public Management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit? Abacus, 45(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00275.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Meijer, A. J. (2013). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 429–439. doi:10.1111/puar.12032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00443.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918–938. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mulgan, R. (2000). “Accountability”: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00218 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112–126. doi:10.1353/jod.1998.0051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2010). Is e-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments? International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 350–380. doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.524834 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323. doi:10.1177/0275074006296777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Raudla, R. (2022). Politicians’ use of performance information in the budget process. Public Money & Management, 42, 144–151. doi:10.1080/09540962.2021.1989779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. The Raudla article is a real study on the use of performance information in government budgeting and is directly relevant to the manuscript’s discussion of evidence-based budget decisions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for “intelligent” accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Schillemans, T. (2016). Calibrating public sector accountability: Translating experimental findings to public sector accountability. Public Management Review, 18(9), 1400–1420. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1112423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sebidi, S. D., Aina, A. Y., & Kgwete, E. M. (2023). Auditing public schools’ financial records: A study of financial management from the eyes of relevant stakeholders. Perspectives in Education, 41(4), 237–251. doi:10.38140/pie.v41i4.7105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. The Sebidi, Aina, and Kgwete article provides an especially relevant source for the discussions of school financial documentation, external auditing, financial reports, and stakeholder accountability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Steccolini, I. (2019). Accounting and the post-New Public Management: Reconsidering publicness in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 255–279. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Van de Walle, S., & Roberts, A. (2008). Publishing performance information: An illusion of control? In W. Van Dooren and S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector: How it is used (pp. 211–226). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2019). Making sense of the users of public sector accounting information and their needs. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 478–495. doi:10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2018-0124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. van Schaik, F. D. J. (2023). Reconciliation of budgeting and accounting. Public Money & Management, 43, 338–346. doi:10.1080/09540962.2021.2000693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers
• No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
• Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
• Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
• Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya