From Capacity to Participation: Marital Status, Time Poverty, and Network Exclusion in Youth Civic Engagement- Evidence from the YVF BRIDGE Project, Makonde, Zimbabwe (2020–2023)

Purpose: This study examines why capacity-building interventions fail to produce equitable leadership outcomes for young women in rural Zimbabwe. It evaluates the Youth Voices Forum (YVF) BRIDGE project in Makonde District from 2020 to 2023.
Design/methodology/approach: This study used a theory-driven single-case process evaluation. This method combines descriptive quantitative patterning with qualitative mechanism tracing. The dataset included 169 questionnaires, 24 semi-structured interviews with young women, 10 life-history vignettes, 15 key informant interviews, and project registers.
Findings: This analysis integrates Hofstede’s cultural dimensions (power distance, collectivism, and masculinity) with social norms and household bargaining frameworks. The results show that household permission, caregiving time-poverty, reputational sanctions, and male-dominated networks reduce young married women's participation, despite training. On average, married young women attended 30–40% fewer sessions than their unmarried peers. They also held less than 20% of youth leadership positions. These mechanisms compound and create severe multiplicative disadvantages for married caregivers.
Research limitations/implications: These findings advance the theory of mechanism-level interruption in social accountability programs. They proved that capacity building alone was insufficient. Interventions must directly address mediating cultural and domestic conditions to convert capacity into active participation.
Practical implications: This study proposes culturally attuned adaptations, including male engagement, flexible meeting times, on-site childcare, transport support, peer networks, and nomination targets. These were paired with clear monitoring indicators. Pilot adaptations yielded a 10–15% relative increase in female attendance and improved willingness to take on leadership roles.
Originality/value:This study applied Hofstede’s cultural dimensions to process evaluation. This study provides a novel comparative framework for tracing household and community gatekeeping. These findings offer actionable guidance for gender-transformative youth civic engagement in the rural sub-Saharan context

youth civic engagement; gender; Hofstede; power distance

1. Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/135457097338799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afrobarometer. (2025). Flagship report: Youth civic participation and political engagement in Africa. Afrobarometer. https://www.afrobarometer.org/feature/annual-report-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace (CCJP). (2020.). Project logical framework: Youth Voices Forum BRIDGE project (internal report). https://ccjphre.org.zw/?page_id=35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. JosseyBass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grant, A., Bugge, C., & Wells, M. (2020). Designing process evaluations using a case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials. Trials, 21, 982. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-020-04880-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organisations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hong, Q., Jiao, X., Qiu, X., & Xu, A. (2024). Investigating the impact of time allocation on family well-being in China. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 25(5), 981-1005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Labor Organization (ILO). (2018). Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Institute of Development Studies (IDS). (2023). Strengthening social accountability for meaningful youth engagement in Africa. IDS. https://www.ids.ac.uk/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Iwowo, V., Case, P., & Iwowo, S. (2023). Leadership and culture. The SAGE Handbook of Leadership. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 383-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kaplan, S. A., & Garrett, K. E. (2005). The use of logic models by community-based initiatives. Evaluation and program planning, 28(2), 167-172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Makore, S., Ugwu, C. I., Maboka, K., Raditshego, E., & Pansiri, N. O. (2022). Eurocentric cultural invasions on school leadership practices in Botswana, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe. Journal of African Education, 3(3), 29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mataruka, L. T. (2022). Process evaluation of the Youth Voices Forum BRIDGE project (unpublished bachelor’s dissertation). Lupane State University, Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Moyo, B., & Madibela, M. (2022). African women and girls in a shrinking civic space. CODESRIA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Promundo. (2022). Engaging men and boys for gender equality: Practical guidance and toolkits for community programs (Practice brief). Promundo. https://promundoglobal.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Public Service Accountability Monitor (PSAM). (2021). COVID19 and accountability in Southern Africa. Rhodes University. https://www.ru.ac.za/psam/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Quasdorf, T., Clack, L., Laporte Uribe, F., Holle, D., Berwig, M., Purwins, D., Schultes, M. T., & Roes, M. (2021). Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Research & Advocacy Unit (RAU). (2018). Gender and youth participation in Zimbabwe. RAU. https://researchandadvocacyunit.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Shava, G. N., Tlou, F. N., & Mpofu, M. (2019). Challenges facing women in school leadership positions: Experiences from a district in Zimbabwe. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(14). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tesfaye, A., & Gatellier, K. (2023). Strengthening social accountability for meaningful youth engagement in Africa. UNESCO. (2024). Gender-responsive civic participation: Programmatic guidance and evidence. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wholey, J. S. (1994). Handbook of practical program evaluation. JosseyBass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. World Bank / UN Women. (2020). Policy brief on unpaid care and women’s participation. World Bank / UN Women. https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/topic/gender [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. YETT (Youth Empowerment and Transformation Trust). (2018). Youth civic engagement in Zimbabwe: Barriers and opportunities. YETT. https://yett.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yasui, M., Choi, Y., Chin, M., Miranda Samuels, G., Kim, K., & Victorson, D. (2023). Parental socialisation of mental health in Chinese American families: What parents say and do and how youth make meaning. Family Process, 62(1), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Psychoanalytical Study of the Gift of Magi
• Analyzing Community Initiatives and Government Interventions in Salt Farming Resource Management in Pangkajene and Kepulauan Districts
• Diaconal Ministries and the Ordination of Women
• Socio Economic Changes in Sagar Island before and After Cyclone Aila
• Grief and Its Transformations in Joan Didion’s the Year of Magical Thinking