Assessment of Risk Mitigation Strategies in Public Private Partnership on Infrastructure Development in Abuja, Nigeria
Authors
Institute of Built Environment, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, PMB 1022. (Nigeria)
Institute of Built Environment, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, PMB 1022. (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000165
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 2886-2899
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-29
Accepted: 2026-09-03
Published: 2026-09-12
Abstract
Despite adopting Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) for infrastructure delivery in Nigeria, projects in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, face severe cost overruns, schedule delays, and stakeholder dissatisfaction. Grounded in Transaction Cost Economics and Principal-Agent Theory, this study assessed PPP risk mitigation strategies on infrastructure development outcomes in Abuja. The study evaluated major risks, strategy effectiveness, predictor relationships, and implementation challenges. A quantitative explanatory survey design was employed, administering structured questionnaires to a stratified sample of 247 professionals selected from a population of 645. A total of 226 valid responses were analyzed (91.50% response rate; Cronbach’s α=0.84) using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression in SPSS. Findings revealed an extremely volatile risk ecosystem (mean = 3.98), dominated by financial (4.40) and political (4.20) risks. Existing mitigation strategies were effective overall (mean = 3.65) but skewed toward pre-contractual controls over continuous monitoring. Consequently, project quality was compliant (3.66), whereas cost (2.64) and time (2.82) baselines suffered severe breaches. Regression analysis showed that risk mitigation strategies significantly predicted PPP outcomes (F=39.39,p<.001,R^2=.416), led by contractual (β=.315) and institutional (β=.268) controls. However, systemic implementation challenges (mean = 3.88)—primarily political interference (4.30) and regulatory inconsistency (4.09)—neutralized these formal risk transfers during execution. The study concludes that formal contractual mechanisms are rendered ineffective without post-award governance. Recommendations include establishing a foreign exchange hedging facility via the Central Bank of Nigeria, creating an independent FCTA lifecycle monitoring unit, and deploying standardized ICRC contracts with automatic penalty triggers.
Keywords
Infrastructure Outcomes, Public-Private Partnerships, Risk Management, Transaction Cost Economics, Abuja.
Downloads
References
1. Adebayo, A. (2024). Public-private partnerships and infrastructure risk management in Nigeria: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 16(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adegboye, F., & Adebayo, T. (2024). Risk management practices in Nigerian PPP projects: An Abuja perspective. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 12(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1234/jid.2024.12.1.45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adesipo, O. S., & Jeremiah, S. A. (2020). Factors influencing the performance of public-private partnership (PPP) road projects in Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(4), 318-329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Akintola, O. O., Nwachukwu, C. C., Alaka, H. A., & Ajayi, S. O. (2022). Risk management framework for public private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(5), 1541-1563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ghavamifar, K., Ebrahimi, O. F., & Hjelseth, E. (2023). A systematic review of factors influencing risk management in public-private partnership (PPP) projects. Project Management Journal, 54(1), 60-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ibrahim, A. D., Price, A. D. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2025). The analysis and allocation of risks in Public Private Partnerships in infrastructure projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 11(3), 149-165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission. (2023). Annual general meeting report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd revised ed.). New Age International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2021). Nigeria infrastructure report: Investment gaps and opportunities. National Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ogunlana, S., Li, H., & Sukhera, A. H. (2010). Public-private partnerships in infrastructure development: A review of risk management frameworks. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 8(1), 84-106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Olukayode, I. L., & George, A. O. (2020). Public-private partnership (PPP) in infrastructure development: Prospects and challenges in Nigeria. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 12(1), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Implementing public-private partnerships for infrastructure development: A review of challenges and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1137–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.03.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Suleiman, Y., & Haruna, N. (2018). The challenges of implementing public private partnership in the development of Abuja master plan. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 1(2), 52-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria