Challenges that South Sudanese Refugees Face in their Livelihood Strategies, Eldoret City, Kenya

Authors

Polycarp Owuodho Opiyo

Department of History, Political Science and Public Administration, Moi University, Kenya (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.1210000204

Subject Category: History

Volume/Issue: 12/10 | Page No: 2309-2323

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-20

Accepted: 2025-10-28

Published: 2025-11-15

Abstract

Refugees are increasing worldwide and according to United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), their hosting is the preserve of the destination countries and the international community. Support to refugees is sometimes challenging because refugee agencies and host governments lack adequate resources to take care of their welfare. Most of the refugees are left to fend for themselves. The main objective of this study was to establish the challenges that South Sudanese refugees face in their livelihood strategies in Eldoret City. The study incorporated both the individualist theory and the model developed by Harris and Todaro. The study adopted a descriptive research design and utilized mixed methods approach. The target population comprised of all adult South Sudanese living in Eldoret City, Kenya. The population size was 1396 adults. The sample size of the study as determined by Krejcie and Morgan formulae was 301. The respondents were picked from their households using systematic sampling technique in which every 5th household was selected until the desired sample (n=301) was reached. The study instruments included a questionnaire and interview guide. Three hundred and one questionnaires were disseminated to refugees while seven (7) interviews were conducted for government officers. Data was coded, entered and cleaned with the aid of SPSS software. Quantitative analysis was done using descriptive statistics while qualitative data was thematically analyzed and interpreted. The quantitative findings of the study were presented using tables and charts while the qualitative data was presented using themes, narrative descriptions and use of participant quotes. The study findings indicated that 30.2% of the refugees believed that provision of job opportunities could be a way out to solve the challenges they have on livelihoods. Data from qualitative interviews indicated that sometimes refugees lack money to use, and in such situations the religious members assist them. In addition, other challenges experienced include discrimination by landlords and security enforcement officers. The challenges experienced on refugee livelihoods was exacerbated by inadequate refugee funding. The study concluded that there was a myriad of challenges which refugees face in their day-to-day life and engagement in business is not able to solve most of these challenges.

Keywords

Challengers, Refugees and Livelihood.

Downloads

References

1. Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to Perform a mixed methods Study. Faculty of Engineering of Oporto University, INESC TEC, Porto, Portugal. Volume 5, Issue 1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Babbie, E. (2020). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. CARE (2014), Lives unseen: Urban Syrian refugees and Jordanian host communities three years into the Syria crisis, www.reliefweb.int 9/02/2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Conway, Carrie (2004), Refugee livelihoods: A case study of the Gambia, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. De Vriese, M. (2006). Refugee livelihoods: A review of the evidence. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit. February 2006 Geneva Convention. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dick, Shelly, 2002. Liberians in Ghana: Living without humanitarian assistance. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper no. 57, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Geneva, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Durieux Jean-François, McAdam Jane, (2004). Non-Refoulement through Time: The Case for a Derogation Clause to the Refugee Convention in Mass Influx Emergencies. International Journal Refugee Law 2004 16: 4-24; doi:10.1093/ijrl/16.1.4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fowler, F. J., Jr. (2013). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications). UNHCR (2021). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gay, L.R. Mills,E.G.& Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for Analysis and applications. 9th Ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. USA [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Horst, C. (2001). Vital links in social security: Somali refugees in the Dadaab Camps, Kenya. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper no. 38, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Geneva, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jacobsen, K. (2002). Livelihoods in Conflict: The Pursuit of Livelihoods by Refugees and the Impact on the Human Security of Host Communities. International Migration, 40, 5, 95-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jacobsen, K. (2002). Supporting Displaced Livelihoods: the Economic Impact of Protracted Conflict and Displacement, and Lessons Learned from Four Microenterprise Interventions. November 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jamal, A. (2000). “Minimum standards and essential needs in a protracted refugee situation. A review of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) programme in Kakuma, Kenya”, Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Geneva. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kothari, C.R. (2008). Research Methodology and Techniques, 2nd Edition. New Age International Ltd. Publisher, New Dehli: India .pp 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Krogstad, E. A., & Sandnes, T. (2017). Access to affordable housing and social and economic integration: A study of refugees in Norway. Journal of Refugee Studies, 30(2), 267-286. doi: 10.1093/jrs/few050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kwak, M. J. (2019). Discrimination, residential concentration, and social integration of refugees in South Korea. International Migration Review, 53(1), 109-135. doi: 10.1177/0197918317737235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lo, K. (2005). The impact of forced displacement on urban livelihood strategies: perspectives from Colombian households in Quito, Ecuador. Paper submitted for the International Association for the Study of Forced Migration Conference held in Sao Paulo Brazil 9-13 January 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lokiru, (2009). Effects of social networks on livelihoods in Exile and Return: The case of Southern Sudanese Refugees in Kenya, published at University of Nairobi (UoN). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Macchiavello M. (2003). Forced migrants as an under-utilized asset: refuge skills, livelihoods, and achievements in Kampala, Uganda. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper no. 95, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Geneva, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Milner, J. and Loescher, G. (2011) Responding to protracted refugee situations: Lessons from a decade of discussion, RSC Policy Briefing No.6, Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nahr, D. (2015), Urban Life Worse Than Camps for Refugee Women, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). www.womenforwomenint ernational.org.uk. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Omata, Naohiko (2012), Refugee Livelihoods and the Private Sector: Ugandan Case Study, Refugee Studies Centre Oxford Department of International Development University of Oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pavanello, S., Elhawary, S., and Pantuliano, S. (2010) “Hidden and exposed: Urban refugees in Nairobi, Kenya”, HPG Working Paper, ODI, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Stone, D. & De Vriese, M. (2004). Refugee livelihoods Livelihood strategies and options for Congolese refugees in Gabon: A case study for possible local integration. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, September 2004 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) , EPAU/2004/09, Geneva, 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. United Nations High Commission for Refugees, Urban Refugees. Accessed April 22, 2011.http:??www.United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) .org/pages/4boe4cbab.htm). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2003) Refugee Livelihood Project, Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Geneva United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2005) Handbook for Self-Reliance, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) , Geneva. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles