When Kindness Matters: The Double-Edged Role of Job Embeddedness in High-Incivility Workplaces

Authors

Andiet Yoga Pamungkas

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University, Indonesia Irsan (Indonesia)

Irsan Tricahyadinata

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University, Indonesia Irsan (Indonesia)

Irwan Gani

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University, Indonesia Irsan (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.1210000229

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 12/10 | Page No: 2677-2690

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-20

Accepted: 2025-10-28

Published: 2025-11-15

Abstract

This study investigated the complex interplay between workplace well-being, workplace incivility, job embeddedness, and turnover intention among employees in the logistics sector. Amid rising concerns about interpersonal mistreatment and employee retention, understanding how these interacting variables become critical in high-incivility environments is necessary. The primary objective is to assess the direct effects of wellbeing and incivility on turnover intention and examine whether job embeddedness moderates these relationships.
Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 160 logistics employees in East Kalimantan and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling with SmartPLS 4. The results reveal that workplace incivility has a strong positive effect on turnover intention, whereas workplace well-being has no significant effect. Job embeddedness significantly moderates the relationship between incivility and turnover intention, but not between well-being and turnover intention.
These findings provide new insights into the boundary conditions of embeddedness theory and highlight the importance of social cohesion in mitigating the effects of negative workplace behaviors. Practical implications emphasize the need for respectful work culture and strategic HR interventions to strengthen employee attachment and reduce attrition risks in high-stress settings.

Keywords

workplace incivility, job embeddedness, turnover intention, well-being

Downloads

References

1. Cepeda-Carrion, G., Roldán, J. L., & Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2022). PLS-SEM: Issues and advances. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(6), 1357–1372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-20220237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chin, W.W., Thatcher, J.B., Wright, R.T., & Steel, D. (2022). Controlling for common method variance in PLS-SEM: Review and recommendations. Information Systems Research, 33(1), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cortina, L.M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E.A., Huerta, M., Magley, V.J. (2023). Incivility at work: The impact of rude behavior on employee attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2022). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dessler, G. (2022). Human resource management (17th ed). . Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115– 135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). Using PLS path modeling for assessing moderating effects in variance-based SEM. European Business Review, 35(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR12-2022-0311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2023). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Update and research agenda. Journal of Management, 49(2), 398–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221078947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mercado, R.G., Prieto, M.P., & Ylagan, A.P. (2022). Impact of workplace wellness programs on employee engagement and satisfaction. Employee Relations, 44(4), 701–717. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-09-2021-0422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., & Lee, T. W. (2022). How job embeddedness affects turnover intention: A theoretical expansion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/00219010.87.5.845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mobley, W.H., Griffeth, R.W., Hand, H.H., & Meglino, B.M. (2023). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 149(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mudryk, K. L. (2023). Workplace well-being and turnover intention: A longitudinal analysis of employee retention. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4123452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nguyen, L. D., Tran, BX X. & Pham, H. T. (2023). Leadership behaviors and job embeddedness in Vietnamese logistics companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 61(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Podsakoff, N. P., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2023). Organizational behavior and workplace well-being: Reviewing two decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2023). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pu, J., Zhang, H., & Li, T. (2023). Customer incivility and employee outcomes in service settings: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 98, 103035. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rasheed, MI, Malik, MJ, Pitafi, A. H. (2024). Job embeddedness as a buffer against workplace mistreatment: Evidence from the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Manpower, 45(1), 88– 102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2022-0189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2023). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(3), 524–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2032300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2023). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Thiele, K.O. (2022). Estimation issues with PLS and CB-SEM: Where the bias lies. Journal of Business Research, 139, 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Schilpzand, P., De Pater, I.E., & Erez, A. (2024). Workplace incivility and its impact on job attitudes: A longitudinal approach. Academy of Management Journal, 67(1), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2021.0301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Singh, R., Yousaf, A., & Hussain, Z. (2024). The paradox of job embeddedness: When strong ties increase turnover intention under toxic leadership. Human Relations, 77(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221123742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Singh, R., Yousaf, A., & Hussain, Z. (2024). The paradox of job embeddedness: When strong ties increase turnover intention under toxic leadership. Human Relations, 77(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221123742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Theriou, G. N., Aggelidis, V. P., & Tzempelikos, N. (2024). The contamination of workplace incivility: A small business perspective. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 24(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v24i1.6521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tricahyadinata, I., Hendryadi, Suryani, Zainurossalamia ZA, S., & Riadi, S. S. (2020). Workplace incivility, work engagement, and turnover intentions: Multi-group analysis. Cogent Psychology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1743627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zheng, C., Wang, H., & Fang, H. (2023). Measuring workplace well-being: Scale validation and crosscultural comparison. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles