Peer-Assisted Learning as a Pathway to Academic Success: Unpacking the Mediating Role of Mathematics Attitude and the Moderating Effects of Interest.

Authors

Johnson Osei Poku

Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (Ghana)

Asamoah Benjamin

Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (Ghana)

Agyeman Opambour

Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (Ghana)

Aniakwa Mavis

Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (Ghana)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.1210000292

Subject Category: MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

Volume/Issue: 12/10 | Page No: 3347-3368

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-20

Accepted: 2025-10-28

Published: 2025-11-19

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between peer-assisted learning (PAL) and students’ mathematics achievement, focusing on the mediating role of students’ attitudes and the moderating effect of mathematics interest. The research was conducted in the Sekyere-Kumawu District, Ashanti Region, Ghana, with 350 students from Banko SHS and Dadease Agric SHS selected via stratified and simple random sampling.
Using structural equation modeling (AMOS v23), results showed that PAL significantly predicted mathematics achievement. Students’ attitudes partially mediated the PAL–achievement link (bias-corrected confidence interval did not include zero). Mathematics interest significantly moderated the attitude → achievement path, strengthening the positive effect of attitude on achievement. The study recommends integrating structured PAL programs into the curriculum and promoting positive mathematics attitudes through motivational activities, reinforcement, and supportive classroom environments.

Keywords

Peer Assisted Learning, Students’ Academic achievement, Students’ Attitude, and Mathematics Interest.

Downloads

References

1. Abreh, M. K., Owusu, K. A., & Amedahe, F. K. (2018). Mathematics achievement in Ghana: Trends and challenges for curriculum development. Ghana Journal of Education, 9(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and how of it? Indian Journal of Medical Specialities, 4(2), 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injms.2013.01.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adom, D., Mensah, J. A., & Dake, D. A. (2020). Factors influencing students’ academic performance in mathematics in Ghanaian secondary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(12), 12–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alegre, F. (2020). Peer-assisted learning and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of intervention effects in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 31(4), 100–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anam-Siddique, S. (2011). Conceptual framework development in educational research: Linking theory and practice. International Journal of Research Methodology in Education, 4(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aremu, A. O. (2011). Motivational factors as correlates of academic achievement of students in secondary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(1), 81–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arthur, P. A., Asare, S., & Osei, E. (2014). Enjoyment and motivation in mathematics learning among Ghanaian students. Ghana Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 56–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Arthur, P. A., Asare, S., & Osei, E. (2022). Peer-assisted learning and student engagement in mathematics: Evidence from Ghanaian senior high schools. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 77–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Aubert, B. A., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (2006). A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing. Information & Management, 41(7), 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria for constructivist teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 541–550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2009). Research in education (10th ed.). Pearson Education Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bhattacharjee, J. (2012). Influence of teaching and curriculum on mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Studies, 10(2), 33–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bowman-Perrott, L., Davis, H., Vannest, K., Williams, L., Greenwood, C., & Parker, R. (2009). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 38(2), 256–273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Brown, T. (2019). Peer learning and student motivation in secondary mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cavanaugh, M. (2023). Exploring the moderating role of interest in students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 987–1003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Chen, L. (2018). Students’ attitudes toward mathematics and their impact on achievement: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Chen, Q., Liu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2018). Neural correlates of mathematical attitudes and performance in adolescents. NeuroImage, 183(5), 637–647. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Chouinard, R., Karsenti, T., & Roy, N. (2007). Relations among competence beliefs, utility value, achievement goals, and effort in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 501–517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Cottrell, S. (2014). Dissertations and project reports: A step-by-step guide. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Daud, M. A., Kassim, N., & Ismail, Z. (2020). Students’ attitudes and performance in mathematics: A case study of Malaysian secondary schools. Asian Journal of Education, 9(1), 34–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Davadas, S. (2017). Students’ attitudes toward mathematics and its relationship to achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 123–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Denteh, W. (2017). Mathematics as a gateway to higher education: An analysis of Ghana’s secondary education curriculum. Ghana Educational Review, 14(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude toward mathematics: A bridge between beliefs and emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2), 197–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2019). Mathematics anxiety and performance: A cross-cultural study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Fan, Y. (2016). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in social science research. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4(6), 156–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2012). Students’ emotional experiences and academic interest: The decline of interest in adolescence. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 83–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Galli, B. J. (2019). The value of quantitative research in engineering education. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 17(3), 17–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Goldin, G. A. (2016). Attitude, emotion, and mathematical thinking. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd ed., pp. 36–57). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Hagan, E. (2020). Attitude, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement among Ghanaian high school students. Ghana Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 89–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Hagan, E., Mensah, D., & Ofori, M. (2020). Determinants of mathematics achievement in Ghanaian secondary schools. Journal of African Educational Research, 8(4), 201–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hartup, W. W. (1976). Peer interaction and social organization. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 6, pp. 361–437). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Havens, K., & Williams, S. (2019). Collaborative learning in mathematics: The impact of peer-assisted instruction on achievement and confidence. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Heinze, A. (2005). Students’ interest and its relationship to mathematics performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(2), 155–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Imam, H. (2022). Meta-analysis of peer-assisted learning models: Comparing cross-age and same-age tutoring effectiveness. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 113–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). The use of cooperative procedures in teacher education and professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1319513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kiwanuka, H., Naluwemba, E., & Nsubuga, S. (2020). Attitude and mathematics achievement among secondary school students in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Development, 75(3), 102–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 448–470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Korhonen, J., Tapola, A., & Linnanmaki, K. (2016). Gender differences in motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning among adolescents. Learning and Individual Differences, 47(1), 117–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Kumi-Yeboah, A., & Kim, Y. (2020). Enhancing student engagement in online learning through peer collaboration and social interaction. Online Learning Journal, 24(3), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Leung, K. (2019). Peer-assisted learning in mathematics: Exploring differences across educational levels. International Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 78–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Mathematical competency and achievement: Conceptual and empirical perspectives. Refika Aditama Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Madeleine, M. (2013). Attitude toward mathematics and academic achievement: A review of literature. Educational Studies, 39(2), 145–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education (5th ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Hooper, M. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Mensah, J. K., Okyere, M., & Kuranchie, A. (2013). Student attitude towards mathematics and performance: Does the teacher attitude matter? Journal of Education and Practice, 4(3), 132–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Mereku, D. K., & Mereku, F. A. (2019). Mathematics education and national development: Issues and perspectives in Ghana. Journal of African Education, 2(3), 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Michael, J. (2015). Understanding student engagement in mathematics classrooms. Educational Psychology, 35(7), 812–826. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Morsanyi, K. (2012). Interest, anxiety, and attitudes toward statistics and mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 87–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Moses, I. (2021). Validity and reliability in educational research instruments. Journal of Education and Practice, 12(8), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Mubeen, S., Saeed, S., & Arif, M. H. (2013). Attitude towards mathematics and academic achievement among secondary students in Pakistan. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(2), 87–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Mutodi, P., & Ngirande, H. (2014). The influence of students’ perceptions on mathematics performance: The case of a selected high school in South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n3p431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Nesmith, S. M., & Cooper, S. (2020). Examining the role of student attitude and motivation in mathematics achievement. Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Otoo, D. (2018). Motivation, confidence, and mathematics interest among Ghanaian students. African Journal of Education and Development Studies, 15(1), 122–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Papanastasiou, C. (2000). Effects of attitudes and beliefs on mathematics achievement: A structural equation model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26(1), 27–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Park, C. (2020). Philosophical foundations of quantitative research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(10), 1046–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1651774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Pinter, H. (2022). Collaborative peer learning and its influence on mathematics achievement in high school settings. Journal of Mathematics Instruction, 18(4), 243–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Rahman, M. S. (2017). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Ramdass, K., & Masithulela, F. (2022). Attitude, motivation, and performance in mathematics among high school students: A structural equation modeling approach. Education Sciences, 12(9), 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Reardon, S. F., & Robinson, J. P. (2009). Patterns and trends in mathematics achievement: The role of student attitudes and self-efficacy. Educational Researcher, 38(7), 545–558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Regoniel, P. (2005). Conceptual framework in educational research: An analytical model for linking theory and data. Journal of Social Science Research, 9(1), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Renninger, K. A. (2024). Dimensions of mathematics achievement and engagement: A developmental perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(2), 221–239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Rogan, J., & Schmidt, M. (2017). Interest and motivation in mathematics learning: Exploring secondary school experiences. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 7(2), 22–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Scruggs, T. E., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (1986). Tutoring strategies for special and remedial education: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 52(6), 543–553. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Shekhar, S., Venkat, I., & Gopal, R. (2019). Quantitative research methods: Concepts, techniques and applications. Journal of Management Research, 19(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Surucu, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research: Theoretical perspective. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 9(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.32327/IJMESS.9.1.2020.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Sürücü, L. (2022). The role of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in validating measurement instruments in social sciences. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(5), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1908 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Taherdoost, H. (2018). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 7(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321–345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Topping, K. J. (2004). Peer-assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Brookline Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2001). Research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Atomic Dog Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Ufer, S., Rach, S., & Kosiol, T. (2017). Measuring motivation and interest in mathematics education: Methodological [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles