The Impact of Examination-Oriented Teaching on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Mathematics in Senior High Schools in the Volta Region of Ghana

Authors

Gustav Kwaku Siaw Dompreh

Mathematics Department (Bueman Senior High School, Jasikan, Ghana) (Ghana)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12120152

Subject Category: Mathematics Education

Volume/Issue: 12/12 | Page No: 1793-1802

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-02

Accepted: 2026-01-07

Published: 2026-01-19

Abstract

The study explored how much the teaching method that emphasized examinations affected students’ understanding of mathematics concepts in Senior High Schools. The research was quantitative correlational in nature, and a total of 312 students were stratified randomly selected from a total population of 1,650. Data was gathered through a structured questionnaire designed to measure students’ understanding of the content and their perceptions of examinations as an element of teaching. For the analysis, descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and linear regression methods were applied. The results showed a moderate negative correlation between teaching through exams and students’ knowledge of concepts (r = -0.43, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that teaching through examinations was a significant predictor of conceptual understanding, accounting for 15% of the variance (β = -0.43, p < 0.001). The research suggests that test-centric teaching practices can hinder deep conceptual learning and advises teachers to combine exam preparation with activities that foster reasoning, explaining, and problem-solving skills. The study provides empirical support for the decision-makers and the educators to maximize the assessment-driven teaching without sacrificing the conceptual understanding of the students.

Keywords

Examination-oriented teaching, Conceptual understanding, Mathematics education, Senior High Schools, Predictive analysis

Downloads

References

1. Abbas, M., Shahbaz, B., Latif, S., Ali, Z., Babar, M. a. H., Shahzad, A., Tahir, M., & Sajid, M. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions of Standardized Examinations: Analyzing strengths, weaknesses, instructional impact, and student learning outcomes in the schools of District Chiniot, Punjab, Pakistan. Advance Social Science Archive Journal, 4(1), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.55966/assaj.2025.4.1.053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anane, E. (2015). Influence of accountability pressure on Science, Mathematics and English Language teachers’ classroom practices in senior high schools in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Education Issues and Practice (GJE), 1, 44–63. https://doi.org/10.47963/gje.v1i.467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Au, W. (2007). High-Stakes testing and curricular Control: a qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x07306523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. French, S., Dickerson, A., & Mulder, R. A. (2023). A review of the benefits and drawbacks of high-stakes final examinations in higher education. Higher Education, 88(3), 893–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01148-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Herman, J., Osmundson, E., Dai, Y., Ringstaff, C., & Timms, M. (2015). Investigating the dynamics of formative assessment: relationships between teacher knowledge, assessment practice and learning. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 22(3), 344–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2015.1006521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Machaba, F., & Malatjie, F. (2019). Exploring Mathematics Learners’ Conceptual Understanding of Coordinates and Transformation Geometry through Concept Mapping. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110784 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Madaus, G., Russell, M., & Boston College. (2010). Paradoxes of High-Stakes testing. In Journal of Education (Vol. 190, Issue 1/2, pp. 21–22). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mu, J., Bayrak, A., & Ufer, S. (2022). Conceptualizing and measuring instructional quality in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.994739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Papageorgiou, E., Wong, J., Liu, Q., Khalil, M., & Cabo, A. J. (2025). A Systematic Review on Student engagement in Undergraduate Mathematics: Conceptualization, Measurement, and learning Outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10046-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Piyakun, A., & Phusee-Orn, S. (2025). The roles of teachers’ beliefs and instructional practices in students’ mathematical mindset. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1480277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Kroog, H. (2018). Looking closely at mathematics and science classroom feedback practices. In Cambridge University Press eBooks (pp. 191–218). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930502 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education, Inc. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/preface/0/1/3/4/0134790545.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Vogler, K. E., & Carnes, G. N. (2014). Comparing the impact of a high school exit examination on science teachers’ instructional practices. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2014.v8n2p36-67 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wang, M., Matore, M. E. E. M., & Rosli, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on analytical thinking development in mathematics education: trends across time and countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1523836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1523836 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Weingarden, M. (2025). Exploring pre-service mathematics teachers’ perspectives on balancing student struggle and concept attention. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165, 105143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles