Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya

Mathematical problem-solving skills are a critical competency for secondary school learners, yet many students struggle with applying conceptual knowledge to real-world scenarios. This study investigated the effect of the ASSURE instructional design model on learners' mathematical problem-solving efficacy in secondary schools within Bungoma County, Kenya. Grounded in John Dewey's Cognitive Constructivism Theory, the research employed a descriptive survey design to examine four key dimensions: teachers' analysis of learners' entry behavior, utilization of instructional resources, teacher-learner engagement, and classroom evaluation approaches.
The study population comprised principals, mathematics teachers, and Form Three students from 53 public secondary schools in Bungoma North Sub-County. A sample of 280 teachers and 378 students was selected from categorized schools (extra-county, county, and sub-county tiers). Data was collected using questionnaires, student tests, and principal interviews. Instruments were validated through pilot testing, and data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, presented in tables, charts, and text.
Key findings revealed that teacher responsiveness to learners' prior knowledge significantly enhanced instructional outcomes (β = 0.37, *p* < .05), though diagnostic assessments were underutilized (56.7% of teachers rarely conducted them). Customized instructional materials improved problem-solving skills (β = 0.37, *p* < .001), while excessive reliance on technology had a negative impact (β = −0.31, *p* < .001). Student-led explanations of problem-solving processes were highly effective (β = 0.55, *p* < .001), whereas teacher modeling (β = −0.33, *p* < .001) and unstructured group work (β = −0.19, *p* = .02) were counterproductive. A notable perception gap emerged in assessment practices: 93.2% of teachers rarely used formative assessments, yet 69.9% of students believed their progress was regularly monitored.
Based on these findings, the study recommends targeted teacher training in diagnostic assessments and differentiated instruction to address diverse learning needs. It advocates for strategic technology integration (e.g., GeoGebra) aligned with Bloom's Taxonomy and structured collaborative learning protocols (e.g., defined roles, rubrics) to enhance group work. These recommendations support Kenya's Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC), highlighting the ASSURE model's potential to improve instructional design and problem-solving competency. The study underscores the need for systemic reforms in teacher professional development and evidence-based assessment practices to bridge gaps between teaching strategies and learning outcomes in mathematics education

Problem Solving Efficacy

1. Adi, H. S., Haryono, H., & Sulistyorini, S. (2021). The development of instructional design using ASSURE model in mathematics for elementary school to improve financial literacy. Journal of Curriculum Indonesia, 4(1), 30-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akyeampong, K., Pryor, J., & Ampiah, J. G. (2006). Teacher training in Ghana: Does it count? Multi-site Teacher Education Research Project (MUSTER) Country Report. University of Sussex. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akyeampong, K., Pryor, J., & Westbrook, J. (2011). Teacher training and professional development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Learning from experience. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Khattat, S. H. K., Habeeb, R. R., & Mohammed, A. R. (2019). An ASSURE-Model Instructional Design Based on Active Learning Strategies and its Effect for 1st Intermediate Student's Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching Science Text Book. psihologija, 52(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bailey, J. (2019). Experiencing a mathematical problem-solving teaching approach: Opportunity to identify ambitious teaching practices. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 111–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bavli, B., & Erişen, Y. (2015). Designing PCM instruction by using ASSURE instructional design model. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(3), 27-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chen, I. (2011). Instructional design methodologies. In Instructional design: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 80-94). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Clymer, E. W. (2007). The ASSURE Model of Instructional Design. Recuperado El, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (Eds.). (2012). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st century learning. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hou, H. T., & Keng, S. H. (2021). A dual-scaffolding framework integrating peer-scaffolding and cognitive-scaffolding for an augmented reality-based educational board game: An analysis of learners’ collective flow state and collaborative learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 547-573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hu, H. W., Sasse, G., & Hsiao, W. Y. (2016, March). Teaching a Mathematics Education Course via Distance with ASSURE Model. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2511-2516). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ibrahim, A. A. (2015). Comparative analysis between system approach, Kemp, and ASSURE instructional design models. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(12), 261-270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2015). Investigating teachers perceived self-efficacy and attitudes towards ICT integration in teaching mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 603-620. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kariuki, P. W., & Mbugua, Z. K. (2021). The effect of instructional resources on students’ performance in mathematics in Kenyan secondary schools. International Journal of Education and Research, 9(2), 45-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kenya National Examinations Council. (2019). KCSE examination report. KNEC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the Use of the ASSURE Model by K–12 Teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mbugua, Z. K., Kibet, K., Muthaa, G. M., & Nkonke, G. R. (2012). Factors contributing to students’ poor performance in mathematics at Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education in Kenya: A case of Baringo County, Kenya. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(6), 87-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mutai, B. K. (2015). ICT integration in mathematics teaching and learning in secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 11(2), 44-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Njiru, B. K. (2015). Influence of formative evaluation on learner performance in Mathematics in Secondary Schools in Embu County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ogunleye, B. (2013). Effects of instructional materials on students’ academic achievement in mathematics in selected secondary schools in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(1), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Orodho, J. A. (2017). Techniques of writing research proposals and reports in education and social sciences. Kanezja Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2015). Instructional technology and media for learning (11th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wambugu, P. W., & Changeiywo, J. M. (2008). Effects of mastery learning approach on secondary school students’ physics achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 293-302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study
• Teaching Creative Arts in Public Primary Schools: Assessing Resource Accessibility and Instructional Strategy Challenges in Effutu Municipality