Political Values, Professionalism, and Work Ethics as Determinants of Public Employee Accountability: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

This study examined the key factors that influence public employee accountability, explicitly focusing on the roles of political values, professionalism, and work ethics. Employing a quantitative, descriptive-correlational research design, data were gathered from 400 permanent employees of the Department of Public Works and Highways Region XI through validated survey instruments. Data were analyzed using multiple regression and structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify the best-fit model explaining the drivers of employee accountability. Findings revealed that employees exhibited high levels of political values, very high professionalism, very high work ethics, and high accountability. All three variables—political values, professionalism, and work ethics—showed significant positive relationships with accountability. Professionalism emerged as the strongest predictor, followed by work ethics and political values. However, Model 3 indicated that political values exert the most significant direct influence, while professionalism and work ethics have indirect effects. The result emphasized that civic-mindedness, justice, and moral governance, anchored in political values, guide accountable public service. This highlights the importance of promoting integrity, excellence, transparency, and accountability within government institutions. Public officers and leaders are encouraged to promote global awareness, strengthen communication, enrich task design, and institutionalize value-based leadership to sustain professionalism, ethical conduct, and accountability among public employees.

Political Values, Professionalism, Work Ethics

1. Abanto, R. R. II, & Acero, J.P. (2025). Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations in Davao Region. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), 12(9), https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amalia, M. M. (2023). Enhancing accountability and transparency in the public sector: A Comprehensive review of Public sector accounting practices. The ES Accounting and Finance, 1(03), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.58812/esaf.v1i03.105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Benedicto, H. R., & Caelian, M. V. (2020). Work ethics and job performance of government employees in a component city. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(2), 151–152. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v3i2.226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bernardo, A. (2017). Exploring the political values of Filipinos using an Etic approach. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 7-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., Turner, L. A., & Christensen, L. B. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cooper, C. A., & Reggie, J. (2025). Public sector employees’ political activity across administrative traditions: tensions between democratic participation and bureaucratic impartiality in an era of populism anddemocraticbacksliding. PublicAdministration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/07349149241310404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. De Zoysa, A. H. N. (2022). Inculcating Professional Ethics among Employees in the Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.4038/ijms.v9i1.155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Figliola, A. (2023). Government ethics and accountability: Legal frameworks and public expectations. Public Integrity, 25(2), 113–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Han, Y., & Perry, J. L. (2019). Public Employee Accountability: Development of a Five-Dimensional Scale. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 14043). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Han, Y., & Robertson, P. J. (2020). Public employee accountability: An empirical examination of a nomological network. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(3), 494–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1803092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Haque, M., Zulkifli, Z., Haque, S. Z., Kamal, Z. M., Salam, A., Bhagat, V., ... & Rahman, N. I. A. (2016). Professionalism perspectives among medical students of a novel medical graduate school in Malaysia. Advances in medical education and practice, 407-422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Henseler, J., & Ketchen, D. J. (2012). Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues, and applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kim, J., & Cho, H. (2023). Accountability Gaps and Public Institutional Stress: Implications for Policy Reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mamokhere, J., Musitha, M. E., & Netshidzivhani, V. M. (2021). The implementation of the basic values and principles governing public administration and service delivery in South Africa. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mantzaris, E., Pillay, P., & Jarbandhan, V. (2022). Ethics and professionalism in South African municipalities: COVID-19 procurement as a case in point. African Journal of Public Affairs, 13(1). https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/ejc-ajpa_v13_n1_a7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Montano, M. R., Dasal, A. M., Artificio, R. A. Jr., Opeña, A. R. C., & Mosca, M. G. (2023). Optimizing administrative professionalism: A strategic approach to elevate clientele satisfaction in service-oriented environments. People and Behavior Analysis, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31098/pba.v2i2.2673 researchgate.net+4scribd.com+4journalfeb.unla.ac.id+4journals.researchsynergypress.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nicolas, P. R. (2023). Patriotism, responsibility, and job performance among LGU employees in Laguna. Local Governance Review, 10(2), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Overman, S. (2022). Toward a public administration theory of felt accountability. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Paudel, D., & Gupta, A. (2022). Institutionalizing integrity: Impartiality and accountability in Nepal’s civil service. South Asian Journal of Governance, 4(1), 54–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Republic Act No. 6713. (1989). Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1989/02/20/republic-act-no-6713/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Salkind, N. J., & Shaw, L. A. (2019). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics using R. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Schnell, S., Kim, J., Munno, G., & Nabatchi, T. (2024). How citizens want to “see” the state: Exploring the relationship between transparency and public values. Public Administration Review, 84(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sharma, S., & Rai, A. (2015). A study to develop an instrument to measure work ethics. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(3), 451–460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Simorangkir, S. M., Bukit, J. D., & Hayati, K. (2020). The Influence of Accountability, Work Experience, and Professionalism on the Quality of The Work of Auditors. JASa (Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi), 4(3), 449-459. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Spenkuch, J. L., Teso, E., & Xu, G. (2023). Ideology and performance in public organizations. Econometrica, 91(4), 1171–1203. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA20355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tersona, R. C., & Lagura, G. B. (2025, January). Servant leadership of unit heads, workplace spirituality and ethical climate: A structural equation model on public service motivation. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 9(1), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. https://www.theijbmt.com/archive/0961/1434848158.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 297–332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Structural equation modeling. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 607–634). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. United Nations. (n.d.). Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. United Nations. (n.d.). Goal 16: Peace, justice, and strong institutions. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. United Nations Joint Inspection Unit. (2023). Review of accountability frameworks in the United Nations system (JIU/REP/2023/3). United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. https://www.unjiu.org/sites/www.unjiu.org/files/jiu_rep_2023_3_english.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Van der Voet, J., Van de Walle, S., & Groeneveld, S. (2023). Accountability in the modern public sector: Navigating complexity and stakeholder demands. Public Administration, 101(1), 25–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vandenabeele, W. V., & Schott, C. (2020). Public service motivation in public administrations. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392857 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2016). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Issues and remedies. In K. H. Yuan & W. Chan (Eds.), Advances in methods and practices in psychological science (pp. 173–182). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yulianto, A., Sholihah, B., Baswara, S. Y., & Yustitia, N. L. (2020). The effects of village apparatus competence, leadership, and accessibility of village fund reports on accountability of village fund management, with internal control systems as moderating variables. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(3), 713–719. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zhovnirchyk, Y., & Tymofieiev, S. (2022). Corruption is one of the obstacles to forming the professional culture of public servants. Public Administration and Regional Development, (16), Article 09. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2022.16.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar