Understanding Community Resilience Through Social Capital: A Qualitative Study of the 2024 Flood Disaster in An Inland Area

Authors

Sarina Yusoff

Center for Development, Social and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Malaysia, Bangi (Malaysia)

Dona Raihana Don Ramli

Center for Development, Social and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Malaysia, Bangi (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110035

Subject Category: Sociology

Volume/Issue: 12/11 | Page No: 365-388

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-21

Accepted: 2025-11-28

Published: 2025-12-04

Abstract

Communities in Malaysia’s inland regions remain highly vulnerable to recurring flood disasters, yet empirical understanding of how their internal social systems foster resilience is limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the role of social capital in shaping community resilience during the 2024 flood in Hulu Dungun, Terengganu, one of the most severely affected inland areas. Using a qualitative case study approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 residents selected through purposive sampling to explore their lived experiences, coping strategies and mobilisation of social networks throughout the disaster. Findings reveal that social capital serves as a pivotal mechanism enabling communities to withstand, adapt to and recover from flood impacts. Bonding capital provided immediate emotional support, shared labour and rapid neighbourhood level mobilisation. Bridging capital facilitated access to volunteers, inter village assistance and diversified external resources, while linking capital supported residents in navigating institutional aid, accessing early warning information and engaging with formal recovery programs. The interplay of these three dimensions demonstrates how social relationships form an integrative foundation for adaptive capacity and sustained recovery in vulnerable inland communities. The study underscores the importance of disaster governance, community planning and resilience building frameworks that prioritise the strengthening of social capital as a core component of flood management strategies.

Keywords

Community resilience, bonding–bridging–linking networks, flood disaster, inland communities, social capital

Downloads

References

1. Abenir, M.A.D, Manzanero, L.I.O. & Bollettion, V. 2022. Community-based leadership in disaster resilience: The case of small island community in Hagonoy, Bulacan, Philippines. International of Disaster Risk Reduction 71(4): 102797. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abunyewah, M., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M.O., Okyere, S.A., Thayaparan, G., Byrne, M., Lassa, J., Zander, K.K., Fatemi, M.N. & Maund, K. 2023. Influence of personal and collective social capital on flood preparedness and community resilience: Evidence from Old Fadama, Ghana. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 94 (1): 103790. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bahmani, H. & Zhang, W. 2022. A conceptual framework for integrated management of disasters recovery projects. Natural Hazards 113(2): 859-885. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Behera, J.K. 2021. Role of social capital in disaster risk management: A theoretical review. International Journal of Management 12(5): 221-223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boudreau, D., McDaniel, M., Sprout, E. & Turgeon, A. 2023. Flood. National Geographic Society. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/flood/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bucherie, A., Hultquist, C., Adamo, S., Neely, C., Ayala, F., Bazo, J., Kruczkiewicz, A.A. 2022. Comparison of social vulnerability indices specific to flooding in Ecuador: Principal component analysis (PCA) and expert knowledge. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 73(1): 102897. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Choo, M. & Yoon, D.K. 2022. Examining the effects of the local communities’ social capital on disaster response capacity in Seoul, South Korea. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 75(1): 102973. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Echendu, A. & Georgeou, N. 2021. ‘Not Going to Plan’: Urban Planning, Flooding and Sustainability in Port Harcourt City, Nigeria. Urban Forum 32(3), 311-332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fan, J. & Huang, G. 2023. Are women more vulnerable to flooding than men in an aging japanese society? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(2): 1299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fitzgerald, H.E., Robinson, L.R., Cabrera, N. & Segal, L. 2021. Fathers and families: Risk and resilience. An Introduction. Adversity and Resilience Science 2(1): 63–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hauer, M.E., Hardy, D., Kulp, S.A., Mueller, V., Wrathall, D.J. & Clark, P.U. 2021. Assessing population exposure to coastal flooding due to sea level rise. Natural Communications 12(6900): 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hudson, P., Hagedoorn, L. & Bubeck, P. 2020. Potential linkages between social capital, flood risk perceptions and self-efficacy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 11(3): 251-262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Imperiale, A.J. & Vanclay, F. 2021. Conceptualizing community resilience and the social dimensions of risk to overcome barriers to disaster risk reduction and sustainable development. Sustainable Development 29(5): 891-905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jamshed, A., Birkmann, J., Rana, I.A. & Feldmeyer, D. 2020. The effect of spatial proximity to cities on rural vulnerability against flooding: An indicator based approach. Ecological Indicators 118 (4): 106704. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Khalil, M.B., Jacobs, B. C. & McKenna, K. 2021. Linking social capital and gender relationships in adaptation to a post-cyclone recovery context. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 66(1): 102601. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kriegl, M., Kluger, L.C., Gorris, P. & Kochalski, S. 2022. Coastal livelihood resilience to abrupt environmental change: The role of social capital in a Peruvian bay. Regional Environmental Change 22(103): 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Limante, A. & Теrеškinas, A. 2022. Legal Protection of Vulnerable Group in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland: Trends and Perspectives. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Liu, W., Gerber, E., Jung, S. & Agrawal, A. 2022. The role of human and social capital in earthquake recovery in Nepal. Nature Sustainability 5(2): 167-173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Naithani, S. & Saha, A. K. 2021. Social capital and livelihood strategies in response after 2013 Kedarnath disaster (India). Disaster Prevention and Management 30(2): 179-193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nursey-Bray, M., Palmer, R., Chischilly, A.M., Rist, P. & Yin, L. 2022. Old Ways for New Days: Indigenous Survival and Agency in Climate Changed Times. Switzerland: Springer Internatioanl Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Partelow, S. 2021. Social capital and community disaster resilience: Post-earthquake tourism recovery on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia. Sustainability Science 16(1): 203-220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rentschler, J. & Salhab, M. 2020. People in Harm’s Way: Flood Exposure and Poverty in 189 Countries. World Bank Group: Climate Change Group & Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery. https://documents1.worldbank.org/ curated/en/669141603288540994/pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Roque, A.D., Pijawka, D., Wutich, A. 2020. The role of social capital in resiliency: Disaster recovery in Puerto Rico. Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy 11 (2): 204–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rustinsyah, R., Prasetyo, R.A. & Adib, M. 2021. Social capital for flood disaster management: Case study of flooding in a village of Bengawan Solo Riverbank, Tuban, East Java Province. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 52(101963): 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Setiani, P. 2020. Sains Perubahan Iklim. Indonesia: PT Bumi Aksara. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Su, Y. 2022. Networks of recovery: Remittances, social capital and post-disaster recovery in Tacloban City, Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 67(102641): 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Su, Y. & Le Dé, L. 2020. Whose views matter in post-disaster recovery? A case study of “build back better” in Tacloban City after Typhoon Haiyan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 51(101786): 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sung, C.H. & Liaw, S. C. 2020. A GIS-based approach for assessing social vulnerability to flood and debris flow hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 46(1): 101531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tellman, B., Sullivan, J.A., Kuhn, C., Kettner, A.J., Doyle, C.S., Brakenridge, G.R., Erickson, T.A. & Slayback, D.A. 2021. Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods. Nature 596 (1) 80-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Terblanche, T., De Sousa, L.O. & Van Niekerk, D. 2022. Disaster resilience framework indicators for a city’s disaster resilience planning strategy. Jàmbá Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 14(1): 1264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Terumoto, K., Tsuchiya, Y., Otagiri, R., Nakabayashi, H. & Nakabayashi, I. 2022. Trends and relationships in victims’ recovery perceptions: A case study of the recovery process following the Great East Japan Earthquake. Natural Hazards 110(2): 1061-1081. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tew, Y.L., Tan, M.L., Juneng, L., Chun, K.P., Hafiz, M., Osman, S., Samat, N., Chang, C.K., & Kabir, M.H. 2022. Rapid extreme tropical precipitation and flood inundation mapping framework (RETRACE): Initial testing for the 2021–2022 Malaysia flood. International Journal of Geo-Information 1(7): 378. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tiggeloven, T., De Moel, H., Winsemius, H.C., Eilander, D., Erkens, G., Gebremedhin, E., Loaiza, A.D., Kuzma, S., Luo, T., Iceland, C., Bouwman, A., Van Huijstee, J., Ligtvoet, W. & Ward, P.J. 2020. Global-scale benefit–cost analysis of coastal flood adaptation to different flood risk drivers using structural measures. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 20(4): 1025–1044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ungar, M. & Lustig, S. 2020. Building resilience: A framework for dealing with stress and adversity across the lifespan. Bloomfield, United State: The CIGNA Group. https://cignaresilience.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Yu, Q., Wang, Y. & Li, N. 2022. Extreme flood disasters: Comprehensive impact and assessment. Water 14(8): 1211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zander, K.K., Sibarani, R., Abunyewah, M., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O., Moss, S. A., Lassa, J., Garnett, S. T. 2023. Community Resilience across Australia towards Natural Hazards: an Application of the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement.Disasters, 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles