Academic Dishonesty in North Weast Ethiopia, Amhara Region Particularly at East Gojjam Zone Preparatory Schools.

Academic dishonesty is a widespread problem across the globe, though its causes, forms, and practices vary from country to country. In Ethiopia, academic dishonesty has increasingly become normalized across educational institutions and has grown more sophisticated over time. To help address this issue, the present study explored the nature, causes, types, and emerging practices of academic dishonesty in preparatory schools of East Gojjam Zone.The study employed a qualitative research approach with a case study design. Primary data were collected from twenty semi-structured interview participants, seven key informants, and eight focus group discussants drawn from the interviewees. All participants were selected using purposive non-probability sampling techniques. Data collection tools included semi-structured interviews, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis.The findings revealed that academic dishonesty in East Gojjam Zone preparatory schools is influenced by multiple interrelated factors. Major causes include teachers’ dissatisfaction with their profession, poorly designed curricula, large class sizes, lack of effective punishment, weak government commitment, low professional dignity of teachers, negative societal attitudes toward education, and students’ limited academic vision. The study also identified various types of academic dishonesty, such as cheating, corruption, misrepresentation, submission of duplicated work, and collusion. Furthermore, innovative and sophisticated cheating methods were reported, including the use of tissue paper for copying notes, mobile phones with earphones, hidden written materials using pencils or pen covers, rope-assisted answer sharing, shared calculators, and gesture-based communication.The study concludes that academic dishonesty in preparatory schools is a multifaceted problem with diverse causes, types, and evolving methods. Based on these conclusions, the study recommends minimizing government interference in academic matters, strengthening secular education, enhancing teacher and parent collaboration, improving teachers’ working conditions and professional status, raising students’ academic commitment and self-confidence, and promoting civic and ethical education to foster academic integrity.

causes, type, new ways of cheating, academic dishonesty.

1. Aaron, L., & Roche, C. (2013). Stemming the tide of academic dishonesty in higher education: It takes a village. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42(2), 161–196. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.42.2.f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Academic Dishonesty Integrity Council. (2018). Types of academic dishonesty. https://www.academicintegrity.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bjorklund, P. M. (1999). Academic cheating: Frequency, methods, and causes. Journal of College Student Development, 40(3), 319–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., Montgomery, S. M., & Passow, H. J. (2006). Engineering students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward cheating. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00891 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Coalter, T., et al. (2007). Factors that influence faculty actions: A study on faculty responses to academic dishonesty. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/xxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Diego, L. A. B. (2017). Friends with benefits: Causes and effects of learners’ cheating practices during examination. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.5.2.06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Denisova Schmidt, E. (2018). Corruption, the lack of academic integrity and other ethical issues in higher education: What can be done within the Bologna Process? In A. Curaj, L. Deca, & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies (pp. 61–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 3 319 77407 7_5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Finn, S., McDonald, J., & Turnage, L. (2006). Origins of academic dishonesty: Ethical orientations and personality factors associated with attitudes about cheating with information technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Greene, J., Kiewra, K., & Johnson, A. (1992). Everybody (else) does it: Academic cheating. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Grimes, P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in academics and business: A cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 273–290 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000014300.17888.63 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Harper, M. G. (2006). High tech cheating. Nurse Education Today, 26(8), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.03.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hulsart, R., & McCarthy, V. (2011). Utilizing a culture of trust to promote academic integrity. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(2), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2011.544966 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ibarra, J. (n.d.). Plagiarism & academic integrity: Types of academic dishonesty. Retrieved December 15, 2025, from https://libguides.lipscomb.edu/plagiarism/dishonesty [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jones, L. R. (2011). Academic integrity and academic dishonesty: A handbook about cheating and plagiarism (Revised & expanded ed.). Florida Institute of Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Joughin, G., & Macdonald, R. (2004). A model of assessment in higher education institutions. The Higher Education Academy. http://www.llas.ac.uk/resourcedownloads/2968/Joughin_and_Macdonald_model_assessment.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Krueger, L. (2014). Academic dishonesty among nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140122-02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. (2000). Student cheating and plagiarism in the Internet era: A wake-up call. Libraries Unlimited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Michael, S. (2009). Research design in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Morse, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous and sequential qualitative mixed method designs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Olson, H. (2005). Quantitative “versus” qualitative research: The wrong question. In N. K. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Paksu, D. (2004). The attitudes towards teaching profession of in-service and pre-service primary school teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 427–436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Philippines, A., et al. (2015). Prevalence, motives, and views of academic dishonesty in higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rogers, E. M., & Nall, J. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rujoiu, R. (2014). Academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty. In Management challenges for sustainable development (pp. 512–519). Bucharest, Romania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. SIDA. (2000). Teacher education, teachers’ conditions and motivation. University of Minnesota. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Stennett, R., Allen, C., Stanley, S., & Cascoe, K. (2017). Academic dishonesty among undergraduate nursing students. International Archives of Nursing and Health Care, 3(3), Article 074. https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5823/1510074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Stephen, F., Johnson, P., & Lee, M. (2009). Cheating in school: Understanding academic dishonesty among students. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. University of Delaware. (2018). Student guide to university policies. University of Delaware. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Whitley, J., & Keith, R. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator's guide. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wideman, M. (2008). Academic dishonesty in postsecondary education. Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Witherspoon, K., Smith, R. J., & Davis, H. (2010). Academic dishonesty of undergraduates: Methods of cheating. Journal of College Academic Integrity, 8(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3905/jcai.2010.8.1.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study