Educational Inequity as a Driver of Intergenerational Poverty Among Rural Households in Southwestern Nigeria

Education is widely recognized as a critical pathway out of poverty; however, persistent disparities in access to quality education in Nigeria continue to reinforce socio-economic inequality. This study investigated the influence of socio-economic factors on educational inequality and the persistence of intergenerational poverty among rural households in Southwestern Nigeria. Anchored in Human Capital Theory, Social Reproduction Theory, and the Intergenerational Transmission of Poverty framework, the study adopted a descriptive correlational survey design. A total of 900 respondents comprising students, teachers, and parents were selected from Osun, Oyo, and Ogun States using a multi-stage sampling technique. Data were gathered through a validated instrument—the Socio-Economic Determinants, Educational Inequality, and Poverty Cycle Questionnaire (SEDEIPCQ)—which produced a reliability coefficient of 0.87. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS (Version 29) and the PROCESS Macro. The results showed that parental income, educational attainment, and occupation significantly influenced students’ access to quality education (R² = 0.45, p < 0.05). In addition, residential location was found to partially mediate the relationship between socio-economic status and educational inequality (β = 0.16, p < 0.05). The findings further indicated that children from economically disadvantaged and less-educated households in rural communities encounter systemic constraints that hinder educational participation, skill development, and future employability, thereby sustaining poverty across generations. Respondents strongly supported policy measures such as scholarship schemes, infrastructural development, and the incorporation of vocational and digital competencies into school curricula. The study concludes that educational inequality simultaneously reflects and reinforces poverty, underscoring the need for comprehensive policies that integrate socio-economic empowerment with equitable and skills-based educational provision.

Educational inequality, intergenerational poverty, socio-economic status, skill acquisition, employability, rural households, Southwestern Nigeria.

1. Adedeji, S. O., & Olaniyan, O. (2011). Improving the conditions of teachers and teaching in rural schools across African countries. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bird, K. (2007). The intergenerational transmission of poverty: An overview. Chronic Poverty Research Centre, University of Manchester. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Schooling in capitalist America revisited. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Federal Ministry of Education. (2022). Education sector performance report. Federal Republic of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ogunleye, A. O., & Adeyemi, K. A. (2020). Rural–urban disparities in educational quality in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 15(2), 44–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Olayinka, M. A., & Adesoji, A. T. (2022). Educational deprivation and youth employability in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Oketch, M., & Rolleston, C. (2020). Education and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa: Re- examining the link. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report 2021/22: Non-state actors in education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. UNESCO. (2023). Education for all global monitoring report: Progress and challenges. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Bank. (2022). World development report 2022: The state of education and learning recovery. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers
• No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
• Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
• Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
• Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya