Leadership Practices and Performance of School Heads in Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Areas: Implications for School-Based Management

School leadership plays a critical role in shaping instructional quality, organizational effectiveness, and learner outcomes, particularly in contexts characterized by structural constraints and limited access to resources. In the Philippines, School-Based Management (SBM) positions school heads as key agents of decentralized governance, tasked with translating national policies into context-responsive school-level practices. This study examined the leadership practices and performance of school heads in public schools located in a Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Area (GIDA), focusing on perception differences between teachers and school heads within the SBM framework. Employing a quantitative descriptive-comparative design, data were collected from 103 teachers and 13 school heads in the Asipulo District, Ifugao. Results reveal consistent perceptual gaps, with school heads rating both their leadership practices and performance significantly higher than teachers. While leadership practices were assessed by teachers as intensively practiced and performance as maturing, school heads rated both at the highest qualitative levels. The findings suggest that in GIDA contexts, leadership effectiveness under SBM is often experienced by teachers as procedural rather than transformative. The study highlights the need for participatory, instruction-centered, and context-sensitive leadership approaches to strengthen SBM implementation in geographically disadvantaged settings.

GIDA, leadership practices, school-based management, school head performance

1. Aquino, A. P., De Guzman, J. M., & Manlangit, P. R. (2021). Leadership practices and School-Based Management implementation in rural public schools in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(5), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2020-0137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bush, T., & Ng, A. (2019). Distributed leadership and the impact of school leadership on teaching and learning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Department of Education. (2016). School-Based Management Manual (2nd ed.). Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gonzales, R. S., & Mendoza, A. P. (2022). Building community resilience through educational leadership in rural schools. Journal of Community Development and Education, 10(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.53245/jcde.v10i2.356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2022). Assessing instructional leadership: Measurement properties of the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220988066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hoque, K. E., Rahman, M. F., & Uddin, M. A. (2023). Relationship between Principals’ Leadership Styles and Teachers’ Job Outcomes. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.995277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kiral, E. (2017). The relationship between teachers’ perception of school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and teachers’ organizational commitment. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 6(1), 98–107. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1254691.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Montague, C. F. (2017). Elementary Principals and Teachers: Perception Alignment of Leadership Behaviors (Doctoral dissertation). Gardner-Webb University. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/education_etd/238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Netolicky, D. M. (2020). School leadership during a pandemic: Navigating tensions. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3–4), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Petalla, M. L. A. (2022). Adaptive leadership practices of school heads in geographically isolated public schools in the Philippines. The Normal Lights, 16(1), 92–115. https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/normallights/article/view/1691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rivera, J. C. (2022). SBM implementation through the lens of school leadership in disadvantaged rural areas. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 85(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7178825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria