Development and Evaluation of Segresmart: An AI-Enabled Mobile Application for Improving Household Waste Segregation Behavior
Authors
Philippine Science High School (Philippines)
Philippine Science High School (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010011
Subject Category: Engineering & Technology
Volume/Issue: 13/1 | Page No: 117-135
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-03
Accepted: 2026-01-08
Published: 2026-01-23
Abstract
Improper household waste segregation remains a persistent challenge that undermines recycling efficiency and sustainable solid waste management, particularly in urban communities. This study presents the development and evaluation of SegreSmart, an AI-enabled mobile application designed to improve household waste segregation behavior through real-time waste identification and actionable disposal guidance. Guided by a design-and-development research framework, the system integrates image-based artificial intelligence, a user-centered mobile interface, and behavioral analytics to support informed segregation decisions at the point of disposal. The application was evaluated using a quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test design involving urban household participants over a four-week intervention period. Behavioral outcomes were assessed in terms of segregation accuracy, frequency of correct segregation, and perceived behavioral control, complemented by system usage logs and AI performance metrics. Results indicated significant improvements across all behavioral indicators following the intervention, with users demonstrating higher accuracy and consistency in waste segregation and increased confidence in waste classification decisions. The AI model achieved high classification accuracy under real-world conditions, while the human-in-the-loop design, incorporating confidence indicators and manual overrides, enhanced user trust and learning. High usability and acceptance ratings further confirmed that the application was intuitive and suitable for routine household use. Overall, the findings demonstrate that Segre Smart is a functional, usable, and data-driven mobile intervention capable of supporting positive behavioral change in household waste segregation. The study contributes empirical evidence on the effectiveness of AI-enabled mobile applications as decision-support tools for sustainable household waste management. It provides a foundation for future large-scale deployment and longitudinal evaluation.
Keywords
artificial intelligence, mobile application, household waste segregation, waste classification, waste segregation system, sustainable waste management, human-in-the-loop systems
Downloads
References
1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Barr, S., Gilg, A., & Ford, N. (2001). A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards household waste management. Environment and Planning A, 33(11), 2025–2048. https://doi.org/10.1068/a33225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bernstad, A. (2014). Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience. Waste Management, 34(7), 1317–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cong Wang, Q., Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2021). A smart municipal waste management system based on deep learning and Internet of Things. Waste Management, 135, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.08.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. De Wildt, K. K., & Meijers, M. H. C. (2023). Time spent on separating waste is never wasted: Fostering people’s recycling behavior through the use of a mobile application. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ghinea, C., & Gavrilescu, M. (2016). Solid waste management for circular economy: Challenges and opportunities in Romania. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 15(6), 1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2016.139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kaiser, F. G., Hübner, G., & Bogner, F. X. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2703_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Liu, T., Wu, J., & Huang, J. (2020). Mobile app–based interventions for promoting waste separation: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Longhi, S. (2013). Individual pro-environmental behaviour in the household context. ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2013-21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2356306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Mwanza, B. G., Mbohwa, C., & Telukdarie, A. (2018). The application of design thinking in waste management. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Nguyen, T. T., Zhu, D., & Le, N. P. (2015). Factors influencing waste separation intention of residential households. Habitat International, 48, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Persson, A., & Svingby, G. (2020). Mobile technologies and sustainability education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(5), 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S., & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90019-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Singh, A., & Bansal, S. (2021). Household waste segregation behaviour: A review of psychological and policy drivers. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 173, 105694. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Sterman, J. D., Fiddaman, T., Franck, T., Jones, A., McCauley, S., Rice, P., Sawin, E., & Siegel, L. (2012). Climate interactive: The C-ROADS climate policy model. System Dynamics Review, 28(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Yang, M., Thung, G., Yang, Y., & Rahman, M. (2020). Classification of trash for recyclability status using convolutional neural networks. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 158, 104908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104908 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zhang, D., Huang, G., Yin, X., & Gong, Q. (2015). Residents’ waste separation behaviors at the source. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 94, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Zhu, D., Asnani, P. U., Zurbrügg, C., Anapolsky, S., & Mani, S. (2008). Improving municipal solid waste management in developing countries. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7361-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact Of UI/UX Design on User Trust and Task Completion in Civic Tech Platforms
- Solar Cell Photovoltaic Model Shell Sp 75
- Development of an Intelligent Traffic Management System to Address Visibility Obstruction at Urban Intersections: A Case Study of Ibadan Metropolis
- Optimum Placement of Facts Devices on an Interconnected Power Systems Using Particle Swarm Optimisation Technique
- Assessing Construction Transformation and Implication on Future Production Flow System