Public Perception on Government-Owned Public Bus System in Freetown: A Case Study of WAKA FINE Bus
Authors
Computer Science and Engineering, Milton Margai Technical University (Sierra Leone)
Computer Science and Engineering, Milton Margai Technical University (Sierra Leone)
Computer Science and Engineering, Milton Margai Technical University (Sierra Leone)
Computer Science and Engineering, Milton Margai Technical University (Sierra Leone)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010045
Subject Category: Transpotation Engineering
Volume/Issue: 13/1 | Page No: 484-501
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-06
Accepted: 2026-01-12
Published: 2026-01-27
Abstract
Public transportation is very important for getting around in cities, boosting the economy, and protecting the environment. The government-owned WAKA FINE bus system was set up in Freetown, Sierra Leone, to make public transportation more efficient and lessen the need for informal transportation services. This study looks at what people think about the WAKA FINE bus system, focusing on service quality, cost, ease of use, safety, and overall satisfaction. We used a mixed-method approach, which included surveys (n=500) and interviews (n=20) with people who commute in Freetown. The results show that people think the WAKA FINE bus system is cheaper and safer than other forms of transportation, but problems like inconsistent schedules, overcrowding, and limited route coverage still exist. The study suggests that the government should make changes to policies to make services more reliable, add more routes, and get more people involved in the process. This will help people trust government-run transportation systems more.
Keywords
WAKA FINE bus, Freetown, public transportation, government-owned transportation
Downloads
References
1. Cervero, R. (2018). Beyond mobility: Planning cities for people and places. Island Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., & Cecí n, P. (2011). Modelling user perception of bus transit quality. Transport Policy, 17 (6), 388-397. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2012). Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality. Transportation, 39 (5), 847-862. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Jalloh, M., & Bah, A. (2020). Urban transport challenges in Freetown: A policy perspective. Journal of African Urban Studies, 12 (2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Julius Mustapha Harding. Sierra Loaded report: Transport Minister Fanday Turay Announces Date for Free Test Runs for ‘Waka Fine’ Buses. https://sierraloaded.sl/news/fanday-turay-date-freetest-runs-buses/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2023). Freetown urban mobility diagnostic report. https://www.afdb.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Freetown City Council. (2023). WAKA FINE bus performance audit. https://fcc.gov.sl [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Transport emissions and urban mobility trends. https://www.iea.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jalloh, M., & Bah, A. (2020). Informal transport and urban mobility in Sierra Leone. Journal of Transport Geography, 85, 102706. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lagos Metropolitan Area Transport Authority (LAMATA). (2023). Lagos BRT impact assessment. https://www.lamata-ng.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre (SLURC). (2023). Public transport accessibility in Freetown. http://slurc.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Fetters, M. D., et al. (2023). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 12-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. International Transit Performance Initiative. (2022). Standardized transit evaluation toolkit. ITPI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Johnson, R. B., et al. (2022). American Journal of Evaluation, 43(2), 221-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Sierra Leone Statistics (SSL). (2023). Quarterly household expenditure survey. https://www.statistics.sl [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. World Bank. (2023). Affordable mobility in African cities. https://www.worldbank.org/transport [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Freetown Urban Mobility Partnership. (2023). Fare structure analysis report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Freetown City Council. (2025). Public transport safety audit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Sierra Leone Road Safety Authority (SLRSA). (2025). Vehicle inspection report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. African Transport Safety Initiative. (2025). BRT benchmarking study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Freetown Urban Mobility Observatory. (2025). Commuter choice dynamics report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Sierra Leone Ministry of Transport. (2025). Informal transport impact assessment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. UITP. (2025). African mode shift comparative study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Freetown City Council. (2025). Transport infrastructure master plan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sierra Leone Road Transport Authority. (2025). Bus condition audit report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. World Bank. (2025). Urban transport ROI calculator methodology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Digital Transport for Africa. (2025). Contactless payment adoption metrics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Sierra Leone Ministry of Tech. (2025). Smart mobility implementation report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Stochastic Reliability Analysis of Peak Hour Factor Variations and Their Impact on Intersection Signal Delay
- Sensor Technology in Intelligent Transportation Systems - Lane Departure Warnings
- Decarbonizing Mobility in Rapidly Motorizing Contexts: Structural Constraints and Incremental Pathways for Low-Carbon Transport in Cameroon