Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
Authors
University of Mindanao (Philippines)
University of Mindanao (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800390
Subject Category: Human Resource Management
Volume/Issue: 12/9 | Page No: 4292-4313
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-06
Accepted: 2025-10-12
Published: 2025-10-18
Abstract
This study examined the determinants of service orientation among employees of Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations (GOCCs) in the Davao Region, Philippines, with a particular focus on the interplay between human resource practices, organizational culture, and good governance. Employing a quantitative, descriptive-correlational research design, the study utilized validated survey instruments distributed to 400 plantilla employees from the Pag-IBIG Fund, Social Security System (SSS), and Philippine Sweepstakes Office (PCSO). Data were analyzed using multiple regression and structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify the best-fit model explaining the drivers of service orientation. Findings indicated that while HR practices had a positive association with service orientation, they did not exert a statistically significant direct effect. In contrast, good governance and organizational culture demonstrated strong influences, with governance emerging as the most significant predictor. Model 3, identified through fit indices, highlighted the organizational culture significantly mediating the relationship between governance and service orientation. These findings emphasized the importance of promoting ethical governance, inclusive organizational culture, and strategic HR interventions to strengthen public service delivery. This research advocates responsive governance, participatory workplace environments, and competency-based training in the public sector, emphasizing the need for strong institutions, inclusive practices, and sustainable communities to enhance service delivery, employee commitment, and citizen trust in governance.
Keywords
Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture
Downloads
References
1. Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., Suhariadi, F., & Anwar, A. (2022). Human Capital Creation: a collective psychological, social, organizational, and religious perspective. Journal of Religion and Health, 63(3), 2168–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01665-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Addis, Y. (2019). The Effect of Human Resource Management Practice on Perceived Employee Performance: The Case of Ministry of Trade and Industry, Ethiopia By: Yeshihareg Addis ID GSE/8511/09 Advisor: Solomon Markos (PhD.) A thesis submitted to the school of graduate studies of Addis Ababa University in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MA in Human Resource Management Jun 2019Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/579304450/Yeshihareg-Addis [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alfansi, L., Ferry, T., Atmaja, Fachri, E., Saputra, & Saputra, F. (2022). The Impact of Service Orientation on Organizational Performance in Public Sectors: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. Ferry Tema ATMAJA, Fachri Eka SAPUTRA / Journal of Asian Finance, 9(5), 345-0354. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no5.0345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Amalia, M. M. (2023). Enhancing accountability and transparency in the public sector: A Comprehensive review of Public sector accounting practices. The ES Accounting and Finance, 1(03), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.58812/esaf.v1i03.105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ashikali, T., Groeneveld, S., & Ritz, A. (2021). Managing for public service performance. In Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893420.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Barney, J. B. (2007). Resource-based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Belias, D., Rossidis, I., & Papademetriou, C. (2024). Organizational behavior and human resource management for complex work environments. IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bn Aoin, H. M., 140005096. (2017). Impact of human resource management on organizational performance within firms in Saudi Arabia. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Saudi Electronic University, and the College of Administrative and Financial Sciences, the International Journal of Advanced Research. https://www.journalijar.com/uploads/892_THESIS-0866.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Boselie, P., & Van Der Heijden, B. (2024). Strategic Human Resource Management: A Balanced Approach. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2022). Strategy and human resource management (5th ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805534 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Chelangat, B. (2022). Organizational Culture and Organization Performance: A Critical Review of the Literature. In IOSR Journal of Business and Management (Vol. 24, Issue 2, pp. 43–47). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Chen, N. F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in the RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Christensen, B. L., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2011). Research Methods, Design and Analysis. Boston Pearson. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.). https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1178507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ciepley, D. (2023). Democracy and the Corporation: The Long View. Annual Review of Political Science, 26(1), 489–517. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-113010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Civil Service Commission. (2022). The Civil Service Commission (CSC) urged government offices to review their service processes amid reports of slow service from dissatisfied clients. Civil Service Commission. https://csc.gov.ph/gov-t-offices-told-to-review-service-processes [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Cybellium. (2024). Study Guide to Regulatory Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide to Learn Regulatory Compliance. Cybellium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Demir, F. (2022). Innovation in the public sector: Smarter States, Services and Citizens. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Farazmand, A. (2023). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & Colle, S. de. (2010). Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Frimpong, K., & Wilson, A. (2005). Measuring Service Orientation of Service Delivery Employees. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Gabriel, A. G. (2022). Bureaucratic red tape in the Philippines. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1304–1311). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_3523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Garrick, A., Johnson, W. D., & Arendt, S. W. (2024). Breaking Barriers: Strategies for Fostering Inclusivity in the Workplace. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i2/20799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Genari, D., & Macke, J. (2022). SUSTAINABLE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE IMPACTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 62. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034759020220505 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ghimpau, V. (2020). Incentives, rewards, and recognition - what really motivates a researcher? In MDPI eBooks. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-03928-315-6-11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ghosh, S., & Srivastava, B. K. (2014). Construction of a reliable and valid scale for measuring organizational culture. Global Business Review, 15(3), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150914535145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Guah, M. W. (2021). Handbook of Research on Innate Leadership Characteristics and Examinations of Successful First-Time Leaders. IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Henseler, J. (2020). Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling: Analyzing latent and emergent variables. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Composite-Based-Structural-Equation-Modeling/J%C3%B6rg-Henseler/9781462545605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. IaCobucci, D. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90–98. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.). https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2078858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Idrus, S. H., Sumartono, E., Wartono, W., Suharto, S., & Syahriar, I. (2024). Harnessing Digital Transformation for Improved Public Service Delivery: Lessons from Global Administrative Practices. Deleted Journal, 1(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.59613/k8s6s859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Jannah, L. M., Sipahutar, M. Y., & Hariyati, D. (2020). Public Information Disclosure: Mapping the understanding of multiple actors in corruption-prone Indonesian provinces. Policy & Governance Review, 4(3), 167. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v4i3.321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Jo, J., Chadwick, C., & Han, J. H. (2023). How the human resource (HR) function adds strategic value: A relational perspective of the HR function. Human Resource Management, 63(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., Srikandi, M. B., Ramadiansyah, S. A., & Pramana, I. B. G. a. Y. (2024). Transforming Public Service Delivery: A Comprehensive Review of Digitization Initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Marawu, N. M., Utete, R., & Zhou, S. (2023). Good governance as an economic driver for service delivery: Lessons for the South African Government. International Journal of Management Entrepreneurship Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v6i2.1219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Masenya, M. J., & Mthombeni, A. (2023). Governance, Ethics and public service Delivery: the ramifications of corruption. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability, 3(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.31098/jgrcs.v3i2.1893 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Morales-Huamán, H. I., Medina-Valderrama, C. J., Valencia-Arias, A., Vasquez-Coronado, M. H., Valencia, J., & Delgado-Caramutti, J. (2023). Organizational Culture and Teamwork: A bibliometric perspective on public and private organizations. Sustainability, 15(18), 13966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813966 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Neo, S., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Tummers, L. (2022). Core values for ideal civil servants: Service‐oriented, responsive, and dedicated. Public Administration Review, 83(4), 838–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Norona, M., Louisse, T., & Evangelista, L. (2020). An Ergonomics-ServQual Approach in Enhancing the Service Delivery Performance for a Government Agency in the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Nzuva, S. M., & Purity, M. (2022). The Impact of Organizational culture on Employees’ Productivity: A Comprehensive Systematic review. European Journal of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/14-4-05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Olson, J. (2025). Transformational leadership: unlocking potential and cultivating excellence in a team. Jaroslav Zdanovic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Papademetriou, C., Anastasiadou, S., & Papalexandris, S. (2023). The Effect of Sustainable Human Resource Management Practices on Customer Satisfaction, Service Quality, and Institutional Performance in Hotel Businesses. Sustainability, 15(10), 8251. mdpi. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Poniatowicz, M., Dziemianowicz, R., & Kargol-Wasiluk, A. (2020). Good Governance and Institutional Quality in the Public Sector: Theoretical and Empirical Implications. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, XXIII(Issue 2), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Radu, C. (2023). Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Its Impact on Performance and Agility. In IntechOpen eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Reina, R., & Scarozza, D. (2020). Human resource management in the public administration. In Springer eBooks (pp. 61–101). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43799-2_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Salkind, N. J. (2008). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Sari, A. R. (2023). The impact of good governance on the quality of public management decision-making. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Schedler, K., Guenduez, A., & Frischknecht, R. (2019). How smart can the government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government. Information Polity, 24, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP180095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Ssrn.com. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Shanka, M. S., & Buvik, A. (2019). When do relational exchanges matter? Social bond, trust, and satisfaction. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 26(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712x.2019.1565137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Taylor, J. (2021). Performance in the public sector. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 433–450). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805465.013.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Tian, X., & Christensen, T. (2020). Ambiguous hybridity? Main features of China’s service-oriented government reform. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-09-2019-0241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Tennin, K. L. (2023). Change management during unprecedented times. IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. United Nations. (2024). Citizen-centric Digital Transformation. Un.org. https://publicadministration.un.org/unpsa/innovation-hub/Winners/2024-winners/Citizen-centric-Digital-Transformation?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Vanka, S., Rao, M. B., Singh, S., & Pulaparthi, M. R. (2021). Sustainable human resource management: Transforming Organizations, Societies and Environment. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Vaughan, S., & Arsneault, S. (2021). Managing Nonprofit Organizations in a Policy World, Second Edition. Melvin & Leigh, Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Virani, A., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2023). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Public Sector Performance Regimes: A Proposed Causal Model for Aligning Governance Design with Performance Logics. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Wiswadas, W., Sobri, K. M., Alfatih, A., & Alamsyah, A. (2023). Accountability, Transparency, and Employee Performance in Organizational Asset Management in Buddhist Religious Organizations: Evidence from the Regional Office of the Ministry of Religion of South Sumatra Province. JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area, 11(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.31289/jppuma.v11i1.9251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Xanthopoulou, P., & Plimakis, I. (2021). From New Public Management to Public Sector Management Reforms during the pandemic. The effects of COVID-19 on public management reforms and effectiveness. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 26, 576–596. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2016). Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
- A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
- Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
- Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement
- A Project Based Learning Report on Recruitment, Engagement and Retention