Process Development and Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) of Ethanol Production from Switchgrass Using Superpro Designer Software

In this paper switchgrass biomass has been investigated as an energy crop for ethanol production, and the techno-economic analysis is conducted using SuperPro Designer software. Switchgrass is a perennial herbaceous plant, and in US, there are five variety of switchgrass varied like Alamo and Kanlow across different lowlands, and the upland plants included the varieties of Trailblazer, Cave in Rock, Blackwell. Ethanol can be produced from cellulose and hemicellulose, and lignin can be separated as co-product and lignin is not used for conversion to ethanol. The maximum cellulose content belongs to Blackwell and Alamo cultivars which are 33.65% and 33.48 % respectively.; the highest hemicellulose and lignin contents with cave-in-rock cultivar like 26.32% and 18.36%. In addition, the compositions of polysaccharide sugars in the different switchgrass cultivars the maximum glucan (36.60%) and mannan (0.80%) are in Kanlow cultivar, Xylan (21.17%) in Trailblazer, Galactan (1.16%) in cave-in-rock, arabinan (3.01%) in Blackwell. For 1000MT/day ethanol production from switchgrass, a process flow diagram, block diagram and table about process descriptions are developed using SuperPro designer software, and all the process parameters are assumed and used based on the literature. The selling price of produced ethanol is $ 0.9/kg and $ 3.4/gallon based on economic evaluation by SuperPro Designer. Total amount of ethanol produced 90 million gallons per year and total lignin produced 2,20,440 MT/yr and the lignin selling price is assumed $ 0.5/kg. Based on the economic and profitability analysis the developed design process for ethanol production from switchgrass is profitable one with payback time around 10 years.

Switchgrass, TEA, Ethanol, SuperPro Designer, Cost Analysis.

1. Shen H, Poovaiah CR, Ziebell A, Tschaplinski TJ, Pattathil S, Gjersing E, et al. Enhanced characteristics of genetically modified switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for high biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013;6:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Uddin MR, Ferdous K, Uddin MR, R. Khan M, Islam MA. Synthesis of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil. Chem Eng Sci 2013;1:22–6. https://doi.org/10.12691/ces-1-2-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ferdous K, Uddin MR, Uddin MR, Khan MR, Islam M. Optimization of Three-Step Method For Biodiesel Production From Waste Cook Oil. J Chem Eng 2014;27:6–10. https://doi.org/ 10.3329/ jce.v27i2.17775. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ferdous K, Rakib Uddin M, Rahim Uddin M, R. Khan M, A. Islam M. Optimization of biodiesel production from waste Bakul oil. J Chem Eng 2014;68:618–24. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.renene .2014.03.014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cui X, Cen H, Guan C, Tian D, Liu H, Zhang Y. Photosynthesis capacity diversified by leaf structural and physiological regulation between upland and lowland switchgrass in different growth stages. Funct Plant Biol 2019;47:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP19086. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Luo H, Wu Y, Kole C. Compendium of Bioenergy Plants: SWITCHGRASS. 2014. https://doi.org/ 10.1201/b16681. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Pedroso GM, De Ben C, Hutmacher RB, Orloff S, Putnam D, Six J, et al. Switchgrass is a promising, high-yielding crop for California biofuel. Calif Agric 2011;65:168–73. https://doi.org/10.3733/ ca.E.v065n03p168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Uddin MR, Khan MR, Rahman MW, Yousuf A, Cheng CK. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into methanol over CuFe2O4/TiO2 under visible light irradiation. React Kinet Mech Catal 2015;116:589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-015-0911-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ferdous K, Rakib Uddin M, Rahim Uddin M, R. Khan M, A. Islam M. Preparation and Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Mixed Feedstock Oil. Chem Eng Sci 2013;1:62–6. https://doi.org/ 10.12 691/ces-1-4-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Vogel KP. University of Nebraska. Prof Geogr 1957;9:18–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.195 7.94_18.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sanderson MA, Adler PR, Boateng AA, Casler MD, Sarath G. Switchgrass as a biofuels feedstock in the USA. Can J Plant Sci 2006;86:1315–25. https://doi.org/10.4141/p06-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mitchell R, Vogel KP, Uden DR. The feasibility of switchgrass for biofuel production. Biofuels 2012;3:47–59. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.11.153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. David K, Ragauskas AJ. Switchgrass as an energy crop for biofuel production: A review of its ligno-cellulosic chemical properties. Energy Environ Sci 2010;3:1182–90. https://doi.org/10.1039/b926617h. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Keshwani DR, Cheng JJ. Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added applications: A review. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:1515–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.035. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fike JH, Parrish DJ, Wolf DD, Balasko JA, Green JT, Rasnake M, et al. Long-term yield potential of switchgrass-for-biofuel systems. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006;30:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.biombioe.2005.10.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Balan V, Kumar S, Bals B, Chundawat S, Jin M, Dale B. Biochemical and thermochemical conversion of switchgrass to biofuels. Green Energy Technol 2012;94:153–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2903-5_7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Crowe JD, Feringa N, Pattathil S, Merritt B, Foster C, Dines D, et al. Identification of developmental stage and anatomical fraction contributions to cell wall recalcitrance in switchgrass. Biotechnol Biofuels 2017;10:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0870-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sarath G, Baird LM, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB. Internode structure and cell wall composition in maturing tillers of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum. L). Bioresour Technol 2007;98:2985–92. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hashmi M, Sun Q, Tao J, Wells T, Shah AA, Labbé N, et al. Comparison of autohydrolysis and ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate pretreatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 2017;224:714–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.089. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zabed H, Sahu JN, Boyce AN, Faruq G. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: An overview on feedstocks and technological approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;66:751–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.038. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Maulidin I, Utami ARI, Sugiwati S, Darus L, Mel M, Maryana R. Development and Economic Analysis of Bioethanol Production from Palm (Arenga Pinatta) Biomass with Ionic Liquid Pretreatment Using SuperPro Designer Software. J Phys Conf Ser 2023;2673. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2673/1/012027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hashmi M, Sun Q, Tao J, Wells T, Shah AA, Labbé N, et al. Comparison of autohydrolysis and ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate pretreatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 2017;224:714–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.089. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kumar D, Murthy GS. Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics and energy in cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 2011;4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Bbosa D, Mba-Wright M, Brown RC. More than ethanol: a techno-economic analysis of a corn stover-ethanol biorefinery integrated with a hydrothermal liquefaction process to convert lignin into biochemicals. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining 2018;12:497–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1866. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Manochio C, Andrade BR, Rodriguez RP, Moraes BS. Ethanol from biomass: A comparative overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;80:743–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.063. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pardo-Planas O, Atiyeh HK, Phillips JR, Aichele CP, Mohammad S. Process simulation of ethanol production from biomass gasification and syngas fermentation. Bioresour Technol 2017;245:925–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Natelson RH, Wang WC, Roberts WL, Zering KD. Technoeconomic analysis of jet fuel production from hydrolysis, decarboxylation, and reforming of camelina oil. Biomass and Bioenergy 2015;75:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.02.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Amornraksa S, Subsaipin I, Simasatitkul L, Assabumrungrat S. Systematic design of separation process for bioethanol production from corn stover. BMC Chem Eng 2020;2:1–16. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/ s42480-020-00033-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact Of UI/UX Design on User Trust and Task Completion in Civic Tech Platforms
• Solar Cell Photovoltaic Model Shell Sp 75
• Development of an Intelligent Traffic Management System to Address Visibility Obstruction at Urban Intersections: A Case Study of Ibadan Metropolis
• Optimum Placement of Facts Devices on an Interconnected Power Systems Using Particle Swarm Optimisation Technique
• Assessing Construction Transformation and Implication on Future Production Flow System