The Effect of Corn Stover and Pineapple Peel Ratio on Physical Characteristics, Fleigh Value, and Silage Dry Matter Changes

Authors

Annisa Nazaliya Nurramdhani

Student at the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran (Indonesia)

Ujang Hidayat Tanuwiria

Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang (Indonesia)

Iin Susilawati

Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.130200173

Subject Category: Agriculture

Volume/Issue: 13/2 | Page No: 1884-1891

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-28

Accepted: 2026-03-05

Published: 2026-03-18

Abstract

The availability of forage during the dry season tends to decrease, which requires preservation technology to mantain feed availability and nutrient stability. Silage is a forage preservation technology that utilizes anaerobic fermentation to maintain nutritional quality of feed. This study aims to evaluate the effect of corn stover and pineapple peel ratios on the physical characteristics, Fleigh value, and dry matter changes of silage. This study used a completely randomized design (CRD) consisting of four treatments and five replicates. The treatments applied included T1 = 90% corn stover + 10% Pineapple peel, T2 = 80% corn stover + 20% pineapple peel, T3 = 70% corn stover + 30% pineapple peel, T4 = 60% corn stover + 40% pineapple peel. The chopped corn stover and pineapple peel were then mixed with molasses and fermented in plastic containers for 22 days. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple ranged test at a 5% significance level. The observed variables included the physical characteristics, Fleigh value, and dry matter changes. The results showed that the treatment had a significant effect on the color of silage (15.70-17.35; P < 0.05). Thereby, had no significant effect on aroma (20.20-20.70), texture (13.45-16.40), taste (17.55-19.10), Fleigh value (88,68-94,77), and dry matter change (7.21-25.20%). All parameters indicate that the silage results are in the good category. Combination of 60% corn stover and 40% pineapple peel can improve the color characteristic of silage without reducing fermentation quality.

Keywords

Corn Stover Silage, Pineapple Peel, Physical Characteristics, Fleigh Value

Downloads

References

1. Aglazziyah, H., Ayuningsih, B., & Khairani, L. (2020). The Effect of Femented Bran on the Physical Quality and pH of the Elephant Grass (Pennisetum Purpureum) Silage. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis Dan Ilmu Pakan, 2(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.24198/jnttip.v2i3.3029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azizah, N., Al-Baarri, A. N., & Mulyani, S. (2012). Pengaruh lama fermentasi terhadap kadar alkohol, pH dan produksi gas pada proses fermentasi bioetanol dari whey dengan substitusi kulit nanas. Jurnal Aplikasi Teknologi Pangan, 1(2), 72–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Luas Panen, Produksi, dan Produktivitas Jagung Menurut Provinsi. Badan Pusat Statistik [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. David, L. A., Bagau, B., & Telleng, M. M. (2021). Pengaruh lama pemeraman berbeda terhadap kualitas fisik dan pH silase sorgum varietas Samurai 2 ratun ke satu. Zootec, 41(2), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.35792/zot.41.2.2021.36739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hasiib, E. ’Azizah, Erwanto, Tantalo, S., Liman, Muhtarudin, Wati, N. E., & Septia, D. (2024). Physical Quality of Corn Silage using Pineapple Peel Waste and Onggok as Additive. Wahana Peternakan, 8(2), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.37090/jwputb.v8i2.1683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ismayanti, A. N., Susilawati, I., & Tanuwiria, U. H. (2025). Effect of Pineapple Peel Waste on In vitro Digestibility and Fermentability in Goat Rations. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 13(5), 1124–1133. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2025/13.5.1124.1133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Joneri, A., Herlinae, & Yemima. (2025 The Effect of Rice Bran and Cassava Tape Addition Levels on the Organoleptic Quality of Kumpai Grass (Hymenachne amplexicaulis) Silage. Journal of Tropical Animal Science, 14(1), 11–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kilic, A. (1984). Silo Yemi (Silage Feed). Bilgehan Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kuncoro, D. C., Muhtarudin, M., & Fathul, F. (2015). The Effect of Starter Addition in Feed Silage from Agriculture Waste to Crude Protein,Dry Matter, Organic Matter and Ash Content. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 3(4), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.23960/jipt.v3i4.p%25p [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kung Jr., L., Shaver, R. D., Grant, R. J., & Schmidt, R. J. (2018). Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5), 4020–4033. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kurniawan, D., Erwanto, & Fathul, F. (2015). The Effect of Starter Addition in Silage Making to Physic Quality and pH Silage of Feed from Agriculture Waste. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 3(4), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.23960/jipt.v3i4.p%25p [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, D., Xie, H., Zeng, F., Luo, X., Peng, L., Sun, X., Wang, X., & Yang, C. (2024). An assessment on the fermentation quality and bacterial community of corn straw silage with pineapple residue. Fermentation, 10(5), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10050242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mustika, L. M., & Hartutik. (2021). Kualitas silase tebon jagung (Zea mays L.) dengan penambahan berbagai bahan aditif ditinjau dari kandungan nutrisi. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis, 4(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jnt.2021.004.01.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rasuli, N., Wibowo, D. N., & Taufik, M. (2022). Study of The Quality of Napier Grass Silage (Pennisetum purpureum) with The Addition of Lamtoro (Leucaena leococ). Jurnal Agrisistem, 18(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.52625/j-agr.v18i1.223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sandika, A. S., Muria, S. R., & Yenti, S. R. (2017). Fermentasi Kulit Nanas Menjadi Bioetanol Menggunakan Zymomonas mobilis dengan Variasi Pemekatan Medium dan Waktu Fermentasi. JOM FTEKNIK, 4(1), 1–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Septia, D., Muhtarudin, S., Tantalo, S., & Liman, L. (2025). Pengaruh Penambahan Kulit Nanas dengan Level Berbeda terhadap Kandungan Bahan Kering, Bahan Organik, dan Uji Organoleptik Silase Tebon Jagung. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Peternakan, 9(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrip.2025.9.3.464-477 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Septian, M. H., Rahayu, T. P., Abdillah, L., & Elisa. (2024). The Quality of Pakchong Grass Silage Fed with Fermented Bran ss Basedon It’S pH, Dry Matter, Fleigh Score, and Ether Extract. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis Dan Ilmu Pakan, 6(2), 84–92. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jnttip [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Suryani, Y., Hernaman, I., & Jayanti, Y. M. (2017). Pengaruh pemberian urea dan sulfur pada pembuatan silase limbah padat bioetanol yang diberi starter EM-4. Jurnal Agripet, 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v17i1.7077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Titisari, P. W., Elfis, Khairani, & Janna, N. (2020). Pemanfaatan Limbah Kulit Buah Nanas (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) Menjadi Sirup Dan Nata de Pina Untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Rumah Tangga. Community Education Engagement Journal, 1(2), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.25299/ceej.v1i2.4722 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Untari, S. (2008). Pengantar produksi hijauan pakan ternak (1st ed.). Semarang University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wróbel, B., Nowak, J., Fabiszewska, A., Paszkiewicz-Jasińska, A., & Przystupa, W. (2023). Dry Matter Losses in Silages Resulting from Epiphytic Microbiota Activity a Comprehensive Study. Agronomy, 13(2), 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles