Socio-Economic Characteristics and Extension Service Utilization among Fish Farmers in Oredo Local Government Area, Edo State, Nigeria

This study examined the relationship between the socio-economic characteristics of fish farmers and their utilization of extension services in Oredo Local Government Area, Edo State, Nigeria. The study described the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers, identified their sources of fish farming information, Identify extension services utilized by fish farmers; and determine the relationship between socio-economic characteristics of fish farmers and their utilization of extension services
A multistage sampling technique was used to select 119 fish farmers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while Chi-square analysis was used to test the relationship between socio-economic characteristics and extension service utilization.
The results showed that 28.6% of the respondents were between 41 and 50 years old. Males constituted 52.9% of the farmers, while 53.8% were married. Most respondents (67.8%) were Christians. Only 11.8% had no formal education, while the majority had tertiary education. About 82.5% operated farms between 0 and 0.5 hectares, and 63.2% owned three ponds. The internet (80%), fellow farmers (65.5%), and extension agents (45.5%) were the major sources of information.
The Chi-square results revealed that educational level, farm size, and farming experience significantly influenced the utilization of extension services. The study recommends that extension programs should target farmers with lower education levels and smaller farm sizes to improve service utilization.

Fish farming, Extension services, Information sources

1. Akinboye, O. A. (2024). Comparative analysis of fish farming information needs among fish farmers in Lagos and Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture and Earth Science, 10(5), 126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afolayan, A. A., Oke, D. O., & Afolayan, T. O. (2018). An appraisal of the challenges of fish farming in Nigeria and the role of extension services. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 18(2), 153–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ayeloja, A. A., Adebisi, G. L., & Oyebode, L. A. (2021). Contribution of fish farming to the socio-economic status of fish farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science, 56(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bonye, S. Z., Aasoglenang, T. A., & Owusu-Sekyere, E. (2012). Community radio and agricultural extension: The role of local radio in improving farming practices. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 4(10), 240–246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department for International Development (2001). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Edo State Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (2005). A comprehensive development framework for Edo State, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Edo State Government (2023). Edo State profile and development information. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Food and Agriculture Organization (2023). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hegde, S., Kumar, G., Engle, C., Hanson, T., Roy, L. A., et al. (2022). Technological progress in the US catfish industry. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 53(2), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12877 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Idisi, P. O., Adeagbo, B., Maduekwe, I., Ajibola, A. O., & Haruna, S. O. (2025). Empirical drivers of modern technology adoption among farmers in Nigeria. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(1), 1180–1188. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2025.6.1.1180-1188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mohamed T. El-Saadony, Ayman A. Swelum, Mahmoud M. Abo Ghanima, Mustafa Shukry, Amira A. Omar, Ayman E. Taha, Heba M. Salem, Amira M. El-Tahan, Khaled A. El-Tarabily, & Mohamed E. Abd El-Hack (2022). Shrimp production, the most important diseases that threaten it, and the role of probiotics in confronting these diseases: A review. Research in Veterinary Science, 144, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.02.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mousavi, S., & Zorriehzahra, M. J. (2021). Proper management of fish farms for the most appropriate productivity. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 8(1), 127–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Oladele, O. I. (2001). Farmer-perceived effectiveness of agricultural technologies developed and disseminated by research-extension systems in South Western Nigeria. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(2), 176–183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Olaniyi, A., Adeleke, L., Fagbero, O., & Irabor, A. (2025). Investigation of gender roles and challenges in the tilapia value chain activities in Ogun State, Nigeria. Aquaculture International, 33, 659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-025-02346-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ongachi, W., & Belinder, I. (2025). Agricultural extension as a pathway to livelihood diversification and sustainable development in rural communities: A systematic review. BMC Agriculture, 1, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44399-025-00005-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Osagiede, M. A., Alordiah, C. O., & Okoh, P. A. (2024). Revitalizing agricultural education in Nigeria for food production: Embracing innovative teaching methods. Kashere Journal of Education, 6(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Raji, E., Ijomah, T., & Eyieyien, O. (2024). Improving agricultural practices and productivity through extension services and innovative training programs. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(7), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i7.1267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ruben, M. O., Akinsanola, A. B., Okon, M. E., Shitu, T., & Jagunna, I. I. (2025). Emerging challenges in aquaculture: Current perspectives and human health implications. Veterinary World, 18(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.15-28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tidwell, J. H., & Allan, G. L. (2001). Fish as food: Aquaculture’s contribution—Ecological and economic impacts and contributions of fish farming and capture fisheries. EMBO Reports, 2(11), 958–963. https://doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kve236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. WorldFish (2020). Fish to 2030: Prospects for fisheries and aquaculture (World Bank Report No. 83177-GLB). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yahaya, M. K. (2003). Development communication: Lessons from change and social engineering projects. Corporate Publishers Graphics Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
• Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
• Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
• Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
• The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District