Work Centrality and Psychological Contracts in Remote Academia a Post-Covid Conceptual Analysis

Authors

Niku

Bhagat Phool Singh Mahila Vishwavidyalaya, Sonipat, Haryana (India)

Ipshita Bansal

Bhagat Phool Singh Mahila Vishwavidyalaya, Sonipat, Haryana (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.1210000025

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 12/10 | Page No: 245-252

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-12

Accepted: 2025-10-19

Published: 2025-10-29

Abstract

Objectives:

This conceptual paper examines the evolving dynamics of psychological contracts and work centrality within higher education institutions (HEIs) in the post-COVID context. It aims to: (1) analyse how remote and hybrid work have reshaped psychological contracts in academia; (2) investigate the moderating influence of work centrality on employee engagement and organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB); and (3) propose an integrative conceptual framework linking psychological contract management (PCM), work centrality, and institutional sustainability.

Methods:

Adopting a conceptual and theory-driven approach, this study integrates insights from Social Exchange Theory (SET) and Human Capital Theory (HCT). A comprehensive synthesis of existing literature on psychological contracts, work centrality, and remote academic work underpins the development of a multi-level conceptual model. The framework positions PCM as a key antecedent of engagement and OCB, with work centrality acting as a moderator and sustainability outcomes (social, economic, and environmental) as the ultimate institutional objectives.

Results:

The analysis indicates that effective PCM fosters employee engagement and OCB, particularly among academics with high work centrality. These behaviours enhance institutional trust, innovation, and resilience, aligning with the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework. The model highlights that fulfilled psychological contracts strengthen reciprocity and discretionary behaviours, thereby promoting long-term institutional sustainability.

Conclusions:

Psychological contract management functions as a strategic enabler for sustainable higher education. By ensuring fairness, recognition, and flexibility, HEIs can align employee expectations with institutional goals, enhancing engagement and commitment. Future empirical research should validate the proposed framework across diverse academic and cultural contexts to substantiate its applicability and impact.

Keywords

Psychological Contract; Work Centrality; Employee Engagement; Organizational Citizenship Behaviour; Sustainability

Downloads

References

1. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution (Vol. 22). Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bal, P. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G., & Van Der Velde, M. E. (2013). A longitudinal study of age-related differences in reactions to psychological contract breach. Applied Psychology, 62, 157–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., . . . Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of applied learning & teaching, 3, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Decramer, A., Smolders, C., & Vanderstraeten, A. (2013). Employee performance management culture and system features in higher education: relationship with employee performance management satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 352–371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lee, B. X., Kjaerulf, F., Turner, S., Cohen, L., Donnelly, P. D., Muggah, R., . . . others. (2016). Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. Journal of public health policy, 37, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D., & Lambrechts, W. (2013). Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of cleaner production, 48, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher education, 72, 413–434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of management Review, 22, 226–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Organ, D. W. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. In Organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance (pp. 85–97). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of applied psychology, 79, 224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of organizational behavior, 15, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American economic review, 51, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhao, H. A., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis. Personnel psychology, 60, 647–680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles