Spatio-Temporal Changes in Crop Cultivation and Their Effects on Rural Livelihoods: A Case Study of Small-Scale Farmers in Belacoba Gram Panchayat, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal
Authors
Principal, Vivekananda College, East Udayrajpur, Madhyamgram, Kolkata-129, West Bengal (India)
Research Scholar, Department of Geography, Vivekananda College, East Udayrajpur, Madhyamgram, Kolkata-129, West Bengal (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000129
Subject Category: Agriculture
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 1505-1518
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-24
Accepted: 2026-03-30
Published: 2026-04-08
Abstract
Agriculture is crucial for the economy in many areas of India, particularly for small farmers. This study examines the changes in farming over the past thirty years in Belacoba Gram Panchayat, Jalpaiguri. It focuses on how people have moved from traditional farming to growing tea instead. The study used information from surveys of 345 people. Analysed pictures taken by satellites to see how the land was being used. It found that there were changes in how the land was being used between 1995 and 2025. More and more land is being used to grow tea and less land is being used for farming and for plants to grow.
This change has helped many farmers earn money and have a more secure life. It also raises concerns about whether this is sustainable, if people will have enough food, and if the environment can handle it. The study uses ideas about how land use changes and how people can have lives to understand what is happening. This helps us understand what is going on in areas better.
Keywords
Land Use Change, Tea Cultivation, Sustainable Livelihoods
Downloads
References
1. Nguyen, C.V. and Tran, A.N. (2013) ‘The role of cropland during economic development: Evidence from rural Vietnam’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(4), pp. 561–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Foster, A.D. and Rosenzweig, M.R. (2003) ‘Agricultural productivity growth, rural economic diversity, and economic reforms: India, 1970–2000’, paper presented at the D. Gale Johnson Memorial Conference, 25 October. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. McArthur, J.W. and McCord, G.C. (2017) ‘Fertilizing growth: Agricultural inputs and their effects in economic development’, Journal of Development Economics, 127, pp. 133–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Pender, J. (1999) Rural population growth, agricultural change and natural resource management in developing countries: A review of hypotheses and some evidence from Honduras. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Paria, B., Mishra, P. and Behera, B. (2022) ‘Climate change and transition in cropping patterns: District level evidence from West Bengal, India’, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chand, R., Srivastava, S.K. and Singh, J. (2017a) Changing structure of rural economy of India: Implications for employment and growth. New Delhi: NITI Aayog. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chand, R., Srivastava, S.K. and Singh, J. (2017b) ‘Changes in rural economy of India, 1971 to 2012’, Economic & Political Weekly, pp. 64–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lambin, E.F. & Meyfroidt, P. (2010) Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy, 27(2), pp.108–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Pingali, P.L. (1997) From subsistence to commercial production systems: The transformation of Asian agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(2), pp.628–634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Scoones, I. (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (1995) Landsat 5 TM satellite image (Path 139, Row 042), 25 April. Available at: USGS EarthExplorer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2000) Landsat 5 TM satellite image (Path 139, Row 042), 2 December. Available at: USGS EarthExplorer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2005) Landsat 5 TM satellite image (Path 139, Row 042), 14 November. Available at: USGS EarthExplorer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2010) Landsat 5 TM satellite image (Path 139, Row 042), 14 December. Available at: USGS EarthExplorer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2015) Landsat 8 OLI satellite image (Path 139, Row 042), 11 February. Available at: USGS EarthExplorer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2020) Landsat 8 OLI satellite image (Path 139, Row 042), 7 November. Available at: USGS EarthExplorer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2025) Landsat 9 OLI satellite image (Path 139, Row 042), 3 April. Available at: USGS EarthExplorer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
- Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
- Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
- The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District