A Comparative Study on Traditional Hiring Practices and Technology- Enhanced Recruitment Strategies at Schneider Company
Ms. S. Booma1, Ms. S. Jenithakarthiga2, Mr. Cheran V.3, Mr. Dhanasekar4, Ms. Dharshini S.5
1Assistant Professor, Loyola Institute of Technology, Palanchur, Chennai- 600123
2Assistant Professor, DMI College of Engineering, Palanchur, Chennai- 600123
2,4Student, MBA, Loyola Institute of Technology, Palanchur, Chennai- 600123
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12060097
Received: 22 May 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025; Published: 11 July 2025
The recruitment landscape has evolved from traditional methods to technology-driven strategies. This research paper compares traditional hiring practices, like job postings and in-person interviews, with technology-enhanced approaches, such as applicant tracking systems (ATS), social media recruiting, and AI-powered tools. While traditional methods face limitations like time consumption and potential biases, technology offers streamlined processes and wider candidate engagement. By reviewing literature and case studies, the paper highlights the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches and explores factors influencing the adoption of tech-driven strategies, like organizational culture and budget constraints. This study aims to help HR professionals and recruiters optimize their hiring processes for sustainable growth.
Keywords: Traditional Hiring Practices, Technology-Enhanced Recruitment, Schneider Company, Talent Acquisition, Recruitment Strategies.
The field of human resource management has notably shifted from traditional practices to technology-driven strategies. While manual processes, paper-based applications, and in-person interviews have been reliable, they often face inefficiencies and biases. On the other hand, technology-enhanced recruitment employs tools like applicant tracking systems (ATS), social media recruiting, and AI-powered chatbots to streamline tasks and improve the candidate experience. This research paper aims to compare these methodologies, examining their respective strengths and weaknesses, to offer insights for optimizing talent acquisition strategies in today’s competitive landscape.
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to systematically analyze quality management and control practices within the finance sector to enhance operational efficiency, mitigate risks, and improve customer satisfaction. By evaluating current practices, identifying challenges, and benchmarking against industry standards, it seeks to uncover gaps and opportunities for improvement in financial institutions.
Objectives of the Study
Hypothesis of the Study
Sampling Technique and Sample Size
Sampling Technique and Sample Size
The study utilizes non-probability convenience sampling as its sampling technique. This method involves selecting participants who are easily accessible and willing to participate, making it suitable for practical and time-constrained research scenarios. The sample size for this study is 150 respondents. This size was chosen to ensure a sufficient number of participants to obtain reliable data while remaining manageable within the study’s timeframe and resources. The study employs a combination of primary data collection and secondary data collection methods.
Procedure
The questionnaire was distributed among employees and stakeholders of Schneider Electric using a combination of online and in-person methods. This approach ensured accessibility and convenience for participants, enabling a high response rate within the two-week data collection period. The questionnaire focused on gathering insights into the effectiveness, efficiency, and perceptions of traditional hiring practices versus technology-enhanced recruitment strategies used within the company.
Tools for Data Analysis
The statistical tools were Percentage Analysis, Chi-Square Test, Regression Analysis, ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) used for analyzing data.
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Table1: Showing The Classification Based on Age
Age | No. of Respondents | Percentage of Respondents |
20 – 30 | 32 | 21.3 % |
30 – 40 | 65 | 43.3 % |
40 – 50 | 33 | 22 % |
Above 50 | 20 | 13.3 % |
Source: Primary Data
Through the data, it was interpreted that 21.3 % of the respondents are 20 – 30 ages, 43.3 % of the respondents are 30 – 40 ages, 22 % of the respondents are 40 – 50 and 13.3 % of the respondents are above the age of 50.
Table 2: Showing the Classification Based on Which Recruitment Method is More Effective in Attracting Qualified Candidates
Criteria | No. of Respondents | Percentage of Respondents |
Technology– enhanced methods | 90 | 60 % |
Traditional hiring Practices | 43 | 28. 7 % |
No preference | 17 | 11.3 % |
Source: Primary Data
The above table shows that 60% of respondents believe technology-enhanced methods are more effective in attracting qualified candidates, 28.7% prefer traditional hiring practices, and 11.3% have no preference.
Table 3: Showing the Classification Based on How Traditional Hiring Practices Adapt to Changing Recruitment Trends
Criteria | No. of Respondents | Percentage of Respondents |
Highly adaptable | 68 | 45.3 % |
Moderately adaptable | 67 | 44.7 % |
Not adaptable | 15 | 10 % |
Source: Primary Data
The data shows that 45.3% of respondents find traditional hiring practices highly adaptable, 44.7% findthem moderately adaptable, and 10% find them not adaptable. This indicates a balanced view with most seeing some level of adaptability, though a small portion viewsthem as not adaptable.
Table 5: – Showing Linear Regression Analysis
Variables | Unstandardized | Standard Error | Standardized | T value | P value |
Constant | 1.508 | 0.037 | – | 40.699 | <.001 |
Constant | 1.381 | 0.106 | – | 13.034 | <.001 |
How do you perceive the adaptability of traditional hiring practices to changing recruitment Trends | 0.075 | 0.059 | 0.095 | 1.278 | 0.203 |
Source: Primary Data
The p-value is greater than 0.05, which indicates that there is no statistically significant impact of the adaptability of traditional hiring practices to changing recruitment trends on the dependent variable being measured. The T value of 1.278 also supports this conclusion, as it is not sufficiently high to indicate a strong relationship. The weak standardized coefficient (0.095) further suggests that the adaptability of traditional hiring practices does not meaningfully contribute to the variability in the dependent variable in this context.
Suggestions
The study underscores the growing significance of technology-enhanced recruitment methods while recognizing the enduring value of traditional practices. Technology-driven tools, such as AI and applicant tracking systems, enhance efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and diversity in hiring processes. However, traditional methods remain essential for assessing cultural fit and fostering personal connections. The analysis reveals a clear need for hybrid recruitment strategies that integrate the strengths of both approaches. Organizations like Schneider Electric exemplify this balance, leveraging innovation and human-centric practices to optimize talent acquisition. This combined approach ensures adaptability, inclusivity, and effectiveness in an evolving global workforce landscape.